SLATS (Super Low Altitude Test Satellite) / Tsubame
SLATS is a technology demonstration minisatellite of JAXA to orbit the Earth at an altitudes in the range of 180-250 km. Its main objectives are to understand the effects of high-density atomic oxygen on the satellite and to verify the possibility of orbit control using an ion engine system. In this mission, an ion engine system is used to compensate for air drag, which cannot be neglected in such a low Earth orbit. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7)
The Tsubame nickname of the mission, meaning swallow, was chosen by JAXA in 2014 in a public renaming campaign.
Specific goals of the mission are:
1) Verification of super low altitude satellite system
2) Measurement of atmospheric density in super low altitude
3) On-orbit monitoring of atomic oxygen to understand the effects of high-density atomic oxygen on the satellite.
SLATS is planned to be launched as a secondary payload on the ALOS-2 mission in 2013/14 on the H-IIA vehicle. Hence, the microsatellite will be deployed into a sun-synchronous orbit of ~630 km altitude, inclination = 97.9º, the LSDN (Local Sun time on Descending Node) is 12:00 hours ± 15 min.
In the IOC (Initial Orbit Control) operation period, SLATS will reach the 250 km altitude and LSDN of 16:00 hours orbit using its own chemical propulsion system (RCS). At this level and below, the ion engine is used to compensate for the atmospheric drag. A long duration operation of the ion engine is needed.
Table 1: Overview of the SLATS performance parameters
In mid-2012, SLATS is in the critical design phase. The project is developing a new ion engine system for the SLATS and the practical satellites to follow based on the ETS-VIII/Kiku-8 ion engine system.
Figure 1: Illustration of the super low altitude satellite concept (image credit: JAXA)
Figure 2: Orbit profile of the SLATS mission (image credit: JAXA)
Figure 3: Artist's rendition of the deployed SLATS minisatellite (image credit: JAXA)
Verification of super low altitude satellite system:
In the super low altitude orbit, ~200 km high, atmospheric density is too high to keep satellite's altitude by high air drag. Figure 4 shows the relation between the altitude and the air density. By the study of the air drag for the super low altitude satellite, it is found that the satellite's aerodynamic shape and the particular attitude direction to the velocity vector is an important factor for drag compensation. In order to observe the Earth continuously at super low altitude orbit, it is necessary to cancel the air drag to maintain the satellite's altitude.
Figure 4: Atmospheric density as a function of altitude (image credit: JAXA)
The SLATS project will conduct on-orbit engineering tests regarding the orbit and altitude control of the spacecraft with the ion engine system as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5: SLATS operational profile (image credit: JAXA)
Measurement of atmospheric density in super low altitude:
There is a need for air density measurements in the altitude range of ~200 km. Currently, applicable data is estimated by using an air density model based on actual measurement in nominal LEO (Low Earth Orbit), higher than about 400 km and on the ground. In the aerodynamic design of SLATS, the project takes account of the worst case in estimated data. Actual measurements of atmospheric density data will be acquired to be correlated with AOCS and GPS receiver data to study the effect caused by atmospheric density.
Monitoring on-orbit atomic oxygen data:
Since the atmosphere in the altitude range of 180-200 km contains a lot of atomic oxygen (AO), it can deteriorate the materials of a satellite and may cause some unexpected issues. Hence, actual AO density data measurements in the super low altitude range is also a very desirable parameter next to that of atmospheric density data. The project requirements call for the degradation monitoring of material samples (surface change) in the super low altitude environment.
The SLATS microsatellite is intended to be a precursor mission to follow-on operational super low altitude satellites. 8)
Figure 6: Functional block diagram of SLATS (image credit: JAXA)
NSTT (Next-generation Star Tracker): JAXA in collaboration with NEC Toshiba Space Systems is developing NSTT to provide high-accuracy attitude determination results: the random error is < 4 arcsec (3σ), while the bias error is < 6 and 4 arcsec (3σ), respectively, for wide and narrow temperature ranges. NSTT is able to track and acquire stars under high attitude-rate of 2º/s with 99.9% probability. A demonstration/qualification flight of NSTT is scheduled for SLATS. 9)
Table 2: NSTT performance specification
Figure 7: Block diagram of NSTT (image credit: JAXA)
IES (Ion Engine System) : The IES consists of a PMU (Propellant Management Unit), an ion thruster and a PPCU (Power Processing Control Unit), including an Ion thruster controller. The PMU supplies xenon gas to the ion thruster. The PPCU supplies electrical power to the ion thruster according to on-board control sequence. The ion thruster generates ion beam and thrust. 10)
The PMU is almost the same unit as used in the ETS-VIII (Kiku-8) propellant management system. Xenon is used as propellant and is stored in three tanks at a pressure of approximately 7MPa. The xenon mass flow rate into the thruster is controlled properly through a high-pressure latching valve, a regulator, a low-pressure latching valve and mass flow control devices. The mass flow control device is a fixed orifice and the mass flow rate is determined only based on the upstream pressure. The mass flow rate is adjusted at 10.5 cm3/s (including 2 cm3/s for the neutralizer).
The PPCU, developed at MELCO and JAXA, is a new 20 mN class ion engine system used for air drag compensation on the spacecraft. The PPCU consists of seven power supplies (PS-1~PS-7) for an ion thruster, an auxiliary power converter, a primary bus interface, and a signal interface circuit. The Kiku-8 ion thruster has the lifetime of 16,000 hours at 20mN; hence, the lifetime satisfies the SLATS requirement. 11) 12) 13) 14)
The ion engine (Figure 8) produces thrust through the reaction force obtained when ions accelerated by an electrical force are expelled. It consists of an "ion generator" (generates ions from a propellant such as xenon), an "ion acceleration system" (accelerates those ions), a "neutralizer" (emits electrons for neutralizing the ions expelled into space), seven "power sources" (operate the above three sections), and a "controller" (controls the power sources).
Figure 8: Schematic view of the ion engine concept and the electrical interface between ITR and PPCU (image credit: JAXA, MELCO)
The electrical interface with the satellite system has been changed from the Kiku-8 system. The primary input voltage of the Kiku-8 PPU is 100 V. On the other hand, the SLATS PPCU is designed to work under an input voltage between 24 V and 32 V. The control algorithm is different from that of the Kiku-8 IES. The SLATS keeps its altitude by thrust on/off control. The on/off command must be given to the PPCU autonomously as the contact time from a ground station is very short. The thrust is automatically generated or stopped using orbit data gained by an on-board GPS receiver.
Figure 9: Functional block diagram of the IES (image credit: JAXA, MELCO)
The signal interface circuit is connected to the satellite data bus and contains the operation modes. The ORBIT mode is used in the altitude keeping operation of SLATS. The control logic of the operation modes are installed in FPGAs. PS-1 and PS-2 use the same high-voltage transformer to synchronize their output voltage. Their power efficiency of 90 % is required.
Figure 10: Block diagram of the PPCU (image credit: JAXA, MELCO)
Table 3: PPCU operational modes
Table 4: PPCU output characteristics
Figure 11: Illustration of the PPCU ion thruster (image credit: JAXA, MELCO)
Table 5: Main performance parameters of the SLATS IES
Launch: The demonstration/qualification flight of SLATS / Tsubame was launched as a secondary payload on 23 December 2017 (10:26:22 JST, 01:26:22 UTC) from TNSC (Tanegashima Space Center), Japan. The primary payload on this flight was the GCOM-C1 spacecraft of JAXA. The launch provider was Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (upgraded H-IIA launch vehicle). 15) 16) 17)
The H-IIA launch vehicle No. 37 incorporates JAXA's newly developed technology to insert GCOM-C1/Shikisai and SLATS/Tsubame into different orbital altitudes, respectively. It will expand opportunities of multiple satellite launch and take full advantage of the capability of H-IIA.
Launch operation sequence: Figure 12 shows the launch sequence. First, GCOM-C was released into 798 km altitude and 98.6º inclination, LST10:30 of SSO (LST =Local Sun Time of descending node). Second, the upper stage of the SLATS adapter was released. Third, the altitude and inclination were controlled by injections of H-IIA Launch Vehicle second stage engine. Finally, SLATS was released into 643 x 450 km altitude and 98.3º inclination, LST10:30 of the elliptical orbit. SLATS had to be released at such a high altitude elliptical orbit due to the GCOM-C orbit and the orbit control performance of H-IIA Launch Vehicle. It took less than 6,700 seconds to release SLATS from the launch vehicle. 18)
Initial operation: After SLATS was separated from the launch vehicle, SLATS performed the rate damping, the three-axis determination, the sun acquisition and the deployment of solar panels. After that, SLATS checked its own housekeeping devices and began the operation of all mission sensors. After checking all devices, SLATS transferred to a circular orbit and descended to an altitude of 393 km using its chemical RCS (Reaction Control System). This control term is called "initial orbit control". In this phase, the nominal attitude mode is SPM (Sun Pointing Mode). When conducting optical observation and the thrust of RCS, SLATS used NM-Z attitude mode.
Figure 12: Launch operation flow of GCOM-C and SLATS (image credit: JAXA)
Orbit of SLATS: Initial sun-synchronous elliptical orbit, altitude 643 x 450 km, inclination of 98.3º.
Orbit transfer phase: In this phase, SLATS reaches 270 km altitude and -60º β angle at the same time using atmospheric drag, the RCS and geopotential perturbations. The -60º β angle is required for the solar power generation of the ion engine in the next orbit keeping phase (the solar power generation is proportional to sin|β|). The change of the β angle consists mostly of the long-term change of right ascension of the ascending node by geopotential (dΩ/dt).
The period of this phase can be shortened by increase of the inclination (increase of dΩ/dt). However, the inclination of H-IIA Launch Vehicle was changed from 98.6º for GCOM-C to 98.3º in the launch phase. Because the β angle of orbit keeping phase has to be smaller than -60º to restrict electricity consumption of the ion engine. Figure14 shows the β angle begins to increase after about -80º when the orbit plane and the sun direction cross at right angle. Because the β angle is also changed by the north-south moving of the sun, this timing doesn't correspond to the -90º β angle strictly. If the inclination is bigger than 98.3º,the β angle is bigger than -60º before finishing of 180 km altitude keeping, therefore, SLATS begins to descend from 393 km altitude and 98.3º inclination orbit gradually.
Figure 13: Attitude and orbit control plan of SLATS (image credit: JAXA)
Figure 14: Nominal orbit of the SLATS satellite (image credit: JAXA)
The altitude history of this phase is called NDO (Nominal Descending Orbit). NDO is defined before launch and is updated based on the practical separation orbit after the launch. SLATS flies along this altitude history using the atmospheric drag of SPM attitude mode mainly. The design of NDO uses NRLMSISE-00 atmospheric model, 19) Marshall solar activity future estimation model as the solar and geomagnetic activity future prediction model and SLATS atmospheric drag model.
In the case that SLATS doesn't reach to β angle -60º at 268 km altitude, it's impossible to use the ion engine and the altitude keeping mission is put on hold. Therefore, SLATS tracks NDO using the aero attitude control mode and the RCS. This operation is called "NDO tracking".
SLATS has the aero attitude control mode which is divided into "Aero-braking mode" and "Aero-through mode". Figure 15 shows the sequence of attitude change of the both aero attitude control mode in the one cycle. Aero-braking mode is to maximize the atmospheric drag. In this mode, SLATS uses the NM-PX or the NM-MX attitude mode and maintains its attitude that the solar array panel faces to the satellite flight direction in the shadow. On the contrary, the Aero-through mode is to minimize the atmospheric drag. In this mode, SLATS uses the NM-Z attitude mode and maintains its attitude that the edge plane of its solar array panel faces to the satellite flight direction in the shadow. Although the constant use of NM-PX/NM-MZ or NM-Z in the one cycle maximizes the effect of drag control, these attitude modes can't generate enough solar power. Therefore, SLATS uses these attitude modes only in the shadow. The duration of these attitude modes is about 40% of the orbital period.
Figure 15: Aero attitude control modes (image credit: JAXA)
SLATS tracks NDO mainly using the aero attitude control mode and it uses the RCS secondarily at the end of every month. SLATS has only 34.3 kg of the RCS fuel, but SLATS uses the RCS in many scenes (Figure 13). Consequently, saving the fuel of RCS is very important for the mission success of SLATS.
In this phase, because SLATS descends from 393 km to 270 km altitude, there is a possibility of passing through ISS orbital altitude. To avoid the collision, the unified flight dynamics system (uFDS) of SLATS analyses the interference between SLATS and ISS every day. If the interference is expected, SLATS will avoid the ISS orbit actively.
Altitude keeping phase: This phase operates the altitude keeping which is the main mission of SLATS. In this phase, SLATS keeps 268 and 220 km altitude for more than 31days, respectively, and 250, 240, 230, 220 and 180 km altitude for more than 7 days, respectively. SLATS uses the IES (Ion Engine System) above 220 km altitude. Because the atmospheric drag at 180 km altitude is expected to be very high, SLATS uses the IES and the RCS at the same time. The attitude of this phase is basically NM-Y for solar power generation. Available time of the IES has been decided at each keeping altitude according to the β angle because the electrical consumption of IES accounts for about half of total consumption of SLATS. Table 6 shows the use ratio of IES at each keeping altitude, and SLATS only uses the IES for the time which multiply this value by the cycle period in the one cycle. The target accuracy of altitude control is ±1km (1σ) at each altitude. The thrust time of RCS is about 80 sec in the one cycle and is decided by the altitude keeping analysis in order to satisfy the accuracy of altitude control (Table 6). Figure 16 shows the result of keeping altitude analysis.
Table 6: The result of altitude keeping analysis
SLATS judges whether to use the IES (Ion Engine System) and/or the RCS (Reaction Control System) in the cycle at descending node automatically. If the cycle period measured by on-board GPS is lower than the objective value uploaded every keeping altitude, SLATS uses the IES and/or the RCS in the cycle. The keeping altitude is changed by uploading the next objective cycle period. Furthermore, this value is defined for the IES and the RCS independently. The value of RCS is smaller than the IES. Therefore, if the thrust of IES can't exceed an atmospheric drag, the RCS is used automatically. This setting is the core of the hybrid altitude control. The both engines are injected in the regions which have the north or south pole in the center for keeping the circle orbit. The period from launch to finish of 180 km altitude keeping is estimated to be about 633 days.
Figure 16: The history of altitude keeping analysis (image credit: JAXA)
Figure 17: Launch configuration of SLATS (image credit: JAXA)
Figure 18: Configuration of SLATS at launch and on orbit (image credit: JAXA)
• October 2018: Results of SLATS operation (Ref. 18)
- Launch operation: SLATS was released according to the plan. The launch operation needed 6,480 seconds. Because errors of the separation orbit were very small, SLATS didn't compensate the separation errors of H-IIA (Figure 13).
- Initial operation: SLATS used the RCS 40 times from 6 January to 18 March 2018 and transferred from a 643 x 450 km altitude elliptical orbit to 393 km altitude circular orbit. Furthermore, because SLATS descended below the altitude of the ISS, SLATS didn't need the altitude control to avoid the ISS (Figure 13).
Figure 19 shows the history of the altitude and the β angle from launch to the end of initial operation (March 2018). Figure 19 indicates that SLATS stopped using the RCS from 9 February to 7 March, 2018. In this period, SLATS waited for the perigee point takes 15min away from the D point (Figure 15, at the D point, the angle between the vector from center of the earth to SLATS, and the vector from center of the Earth to the sun, is a right angle at the south pole side), because it can change SPM to NM-Z during the attitude mode only at the D point. If the perigee is close to the D point, SLATS can't take NM-Z attitude and can't use the RCS reversely at the perigee point. Therefore, SLATS divided the control for elliptical to circular into two phases. Figure 20 shows the eccentricity vector in the initial operation. As shown in this figure, SLATS could transfer to a frozen orbit at the end of initial operation.
Figure 19: The result of altitude and the β angle in the initial operation of SLATS (image credit: JAXA)
Figure 20: The result of the eccentricity vector in the initial operation of SLATS (image credit: JAXA)
- Nominal operation: SLATS is in the 'orbit transfer phase' at the end of August 2018 and is descending using the atmospheric drag and the RCS. At the end of August 2018, SLATS was at an altitude of 368 km. By the end of August, SLATS had used four times the RCS reversely for NDO tracking. Because the atmospheric drag which was estimated before launch is greater than the actual one.
Figure 21 shows the comparison of atmospheric density between the SLATS data calculated by the change of orbital period measured by the on-board GPS and the SLATS atmospheric drag model, and the atmospheric models which are NRLMSISE-00 (Ref. 19), JB2008, 20) DTM2013. 21) Figure 21 also shows: 1) The atmospheric density of NRLMSISE-00 has more than +20% bias compared with the other, 2) the value of JB2008 and DTM2013 correspond well on an average basis with the SLATS data. Because this trend has been going on throughout four months,the SLATS project decided to revise the NDO to cut off the future fuel of RCS.
Figure 21: The comparison of atmospheric density in April 2018 between the SLATS data and the models (image credit: JAXA)
Figure 22 shows the altitude history of the new NDO. The descend rate of the new NDO is smaller than the old NDO by reducing the atmospheric drag estimation. In the new NDO, SLATS will use the RCS reversely at the end of September and October. After that, it is estimated that the orbit of SLATS adapts the new NDO without the RCS compensation.
- In summary, SLATS finished the launch operation and initial operation successfully and is descending toward the super low altitude. SLATS is in good condition and has the sufficient fuel of RCS. SLATS will be able to reach 270 km altitude at the end of March 2019. JAXA will continue to operate SLATS carefully for accomplishing its mission (Ref. 18).
Figure 22: The old and new nominal descending orbits (image credit: JAXA)
• June 1, 2018: JAXA transitioned the phase of the Agency's SLATS mission from the initial operations to the orbit transfer. After the launch on December 23, 2017, SLATS completed its initial operations phase in March 2018.
- In the ongoing orbit transfer phase, the spacecraft is slowly descending its orbital altitude by the effect of atmospheric drag. At around the altitude of 380 km, SLATS is now continuing its nominal operations. Following are the three mission instruments that SLATS' observation operation is based on:
1) SHIROP (Small and High Resolution Optical Sensor)
2) OPS (Optical Sensor)
3) AMO (Atomic Oxygen Monitor System)
- SLATS continues lowering its altitude and is expected to reach its super low altitude at 268 km around April 2019. Thereafter, the onboard ion engine is used to provide the thrust to keep precisely the altitude.
• December 24, 2017: JAXA received telemetry data from GCOM-C1 /SHIKISAI and SLATS/TSUBAME, confirming that their satellite attitude control system had transitioned to the steady state. The current status of both satellites is stable. 23)
- Subsequently, the following procedure occurred – power generation that supports the satellites' operation by the deployed solar array wings, ground communications and sound attitude control that maintains those operations. Combined by the completion of the series of other operations, such as powering up of the bus and mission equipment, the satellites have entered the state where they can be sustained in orbit. This concludes their critical operations phase.
- SHIKISAI and TSUBAME will move on to the next operations phase, where the functions of the satellites' onboard apparatus will be examined approximately in the next three-month period.
- JAXA conveys deep appreciation for the support by all for the satellites' launch and tracking.
Figure 23: Eventual operational orbital altitudes of GCOM-C1 and SLATS (image credit: JAXA)
• December 23, 2017: Approximately at 12:54 p.m. (Japan Standard Time, JST), the JAXA Santiago Ground Station, Chile received the signals from TSUBAME/SLATS, launched from the JAXA Tanegashima Space Center earlier at 10:26:22 a.m. (JST), December 23, 2017. The signal reception confirms that the satellite's solar array deployment and attitude control based on the onboard sun sensors have occurred as scheduled. 24)
Sensor complement (AMO, MDM, OPS)
The super-low altitude of SLATS requires to observe the material response in the surrounding environment of simultaneous hyperthermal collisions both of AO (Atomic Oxygen) and of N2.
Note: a description of the sensor complement will be provided when available.
AMO (Atomic Oxygen Monitor System)
The AO (Atomic Oxygen) effects are measured by AMO (Atomic Oxygen Monitor System). AMO consists of eight TQCMs (Thermoelectric Quartz Crystal Microbalances ) with polyimide film and its controller. The TQCMs are located inside/outside of the SLATS structure, they measure the mass decrease of polyimide film which reacts with AO to become gas. The amount of AO is calculated on the basis of the mass decrease data.
MDM (Material Degradation Monitor)
MDM consists of the material samples and the optical camera. The samples consist of the conventional outside satellite materials and the next generation AO-resistance materials and so on. They are located on the under surface of the SLATS structure facing the moving direction. The optical camera takes imagery of the samples for studying the mechanism of degradation due to AO.
Figure 24: Photo of the MDM EM (Engineering Model), image credit: JAXA
OPS (Optical Sensor) for Earth observation
The small OPS system will observe Earth's surface to verify the merit in spatial resolution. The spatial resolution of optical cameras is proportional to the altitude. The project will examine the change of spatial resolution following orbit transfer.
Figure 25: Photo of the OPS FM (image credit: JAXA)
1) Hiroshi Nagano, Kenichi Kajiwara, Yukio Hayakawa, Toshiyuki Ozaki:, Hiroyuki Osuga, "Development of the ion engine system for SLATS," Proceedings of the 61st IAC (International Astronautical Congress), Prague, Czech Republic, Sept. 27-Oct. 1, 2010, IAC-10.C4.4.1
2) Hiroshi Nagano, Kenichi Kajiwara, Hiroyuki Osuga, Toshiyuki Ozaki, Takafumi Nakagawa, Kazuo Shuto, "Development Status of a New Power Processing Unit of Ion Engine System for the Super Low Altitude Test Satellite," 31st International Electric Propulsion Conference, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, Sept. 20–24, 2009, paper: IEPC-2009-058, URL: http://erps.spacegrant.org/uploads/images/images/
3) Shunsuke Imamura, Masayoshi Utashima, "Initial Orbit Control of SLATS using Atmospheric Drag," Proceedings of the 28th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Okinawa, Japan, June 5-12, 2011, paper: 2011-d-48
4) Akio Tsujihata, "Strategy and R&D for Space Applications Mission," Microelectronics Workshop,Tsukuba International Congress Center, Japan, Nov. 10, 2010, URL: https://eeepitnl.tksc.jaxa.jp/mews/en/23rd/data/10-03.pdf
5) Kazuya Konoue, S. Yamakawa, S. Imamura, H. Kohata, "Development of Super Low Altitude Test Satellite (SLATS)," Proceedings of the 63rd IAC (International Astronautical Congress), Naples, Italy, Oct. 1-5, 2012, paper: IAC-12-B1.2.18
6) Haruo Kawasaki, Hiroki Kohata, Kazuya Konoue, Yohei Satoh, Shunsuke Imamura, "Development of the Super Low Altitude Test Satellite and Thermal Control," Proceedings of the 29th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Nagoya-Aichi, Japan, June 2-8, 2013, paper: 2013-r-27
8) Kazuya Konoue, Nobuaki Igarashi, Shunsuke Imamura, Shiro Yamakawa, Hiroki Kohata, "Development of Super Low Altitude Test Satellite (SLATS)," Proceedings of the 28th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Okinawa, Japan, June 5-12, 2011, paper: 2011-n-06
9) Shuichi Matsumoto, Takanori Iwata, Hiroshi Kawai, Isamu Higashino, Kazuhide Noguchi, Koshi Sato, "Precision Autonomous Star Tracker for Agile Spacecraft," Proceedings of the GNC 2011, 8th International ESA Conference on Guidance, Navigation & Control Systems, Carlsbad (Karlovy Vary), Czech Republic, June 5-10, 2011
10) Hiroshi Nagano, Yukio Hayakawa, Hiroyuki Osuga, Toshiyuki Ozaki, Kazuo Shuto,"A New Orbit Control Algorithm for the 20 mN Class Ion Engine System," Proceedings of the 33rd International Electric Propulsion Conference (IEPC), Washington D.C., USA, Oct. 6-10, 2013, paper: IEPC-2013-064, URL: http://www.iepc2013.org/get?id=064
11) Hiroshi Nagano, Yukio Hayakawa, Kenichi Kajiwara, Hiroyuki Osuga, Isao Terukina, Kentaro Suzuki, Kazuo Shuto, "A New Power Processing Control Unit for a 20 mN Class Ion Engine System," Proceedings of the 63rd IAC (International Astronautical Congress), Naples, Italy, Oct. 1-5, 2012, paper: IAC-12.C4.4.26
12) Hiroshi Nagano, Kenichi Kajiwara, Yukio Hayakawa, Toshiyuki Ozaki, Yukikazu Kasai, "Optimization of the Operating Parameters for a 20 mN Class Ion Thruster," 32nd International Electric Propulsion Conference, Wiesbaden, Germany, September 11 – 15, 2011, paper: IEPC-2011-032, URL: http://erps.spacegrant.org/uploads/images/images/iepc
13) Katsuhiro Miyazaki, Hiroshi Nagano, Kenichi Kajiwara, Yasushi Okawa, "Research and development of an ion engine for a super-low-altitude satellite," 2011, JAXA, URL: http://www.ard.jaxa.jp/old/eng/publication/sorasora/
14) Hiroshi Nagano, Kenichi Kajiwara, Hiroyuki Osuga, Toshiyuki Ozaki, Kazuo Shuto, "Design of a new discharge power supply for ion engine," 14th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE/PEMC), Ohrid, Macedonia, Sept. 6-10, 2010
15) "Successful Launch, H-IIA Launch Vehicle No. 37 - Encapsulating SHIKISAI and TSUBAME," JAXA Press Release, 23 Dec. 2017, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2017/12/20171223_h2af37.html
16) "Launch of Global Changing Observation Mission - Climate "SHIKISAI" (GCOM-C) and Super Low Altitude Test Satellite "TSUBAME" (SLATS) aboard H-IIA Vehicle No. 37," JAXA Press Release, 27 October, 2017, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2017/10/20171027_h2af37.html
17) Keizo Nakagawa, "R&D of JAXA Satellite Application Mission," MEWS26 (26th Microelectronics Workshop), Tsukuba, Japan, Oct. 24-25, 2013, URL: https://eeepitnl.tksc.jaxa.jp/mews/jp/26th/data/1_1.pdf
18) Shunsuke Imamura, Masayoshi Utashima, Takashi Ozawa, Kyohei Akiyama, Masanori Sasaki, "Current status of the on-going orbit transfer of Super Low Altitude Test Satellite (SLATS)," Proceedings of the 69th IAC (International Astronautical Congress) Bremen, Germany, 1-5 October 2018, paper: IAC-18-C1.8.1, URL: https://iafastro.directory/iac/proceedings/
19) J. M. Picone, A. E. Hedin, D. P. Drob, A. C. Aikin, "NRLMSISE‐00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues," Geophysical Research, Vol. 107(2002), No. A12, 1468, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009430
20) Bruce R. Bowman, W. Kent Tobiska, Frank A. Marcos, Cheryl Y. Huang, Chin S. Lin, William J. Burke, "A New Empirical Thermospheric Density Model JB2008 Using New Solar and Geomagnetic Indices," AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 18-21 August 2008, Honolulu, Hawaii, paper: AIAA 2008-6438, URL: http://sol.spacenvironment.net/jb2008/pubs
21) Sean Bruinsma, "The DTM-2013 thermosphere model," Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, Vol. 5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2015001, URL: https://www.swsc-journal.org/articles/swsc/pdf/2015/01/swsc140037.pdf
22) "Operational Update, Super Low Altitude Test Satellite (SLATS)," JAXA Press Release, 1 June 2018, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2018/06/20180601_slats.html
23) "Completion of Critical Operations Phase, SHIKISAI and TSUBAME," JAXA Press Release, 24 Dec. 2017, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2017/12/20171224_shikisai_tsubame.html
24) "Super Low Altitude Test Satellite "TSUBAME" (SLATS), Current Status," JAXA Press Release, 23 Dec. 2017, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2017/12/20171223_tsubame.html
The information compiled and edited in this article was provided by Herbert J. Kramer from his documentation of: "Observation of the Earth and Its Environment: Survey of Missions and Sensors" (Springer Verlag) as well as many other sources after the publication of the 4th edition in 2002. - Comments and corrections to this article are always welcome for further updates (email@example.com).