MetOp-SG (MetOp-Second Generation Program)
The current MetOp series of EUMETSAT has three identical satellites. Launched in 2006, MetOp-A is Europe's first polar-orbiting mission dedicated to operational meteorology, and will be followed by MetOp-B in 2012 and MetOp-C in 2016. - These first three MetOp satellites guarantee the continuous delivery of high-quality data for medium- and long-term weather forecasting and for climate monitoring until at least 2020.
The EPS-SG (EUMETSAT Polar System-Second Generation) Phase System baseline has been agreed by Council in June 2010 and is based on a Two-Satellite In-orbit Configuration. 1)
In 2011, ESA, in partnership with EUMETSAT, embarked upon the initial steps (industrial studies, Phase A) towards developing concepts for the next generation of MetOp -SG satellites. While the three satellites in the first series are identical, the current concept for MetOp-SG, also known as 'Post-EPS', will comprise two different satellites orbiting as a pair. It is envisaged that each satellite will carry a different, but complementary, instrument package. 2) 3)
In November 2012, the EUMETSAT Council successfully concluded the approval process for the EPS-SG (EUMETSAT Polar System Second Generation) Preparatory Program with all 26 Member States having now firmly committed themselves. 4)
On May 20, 2014, the first documents signalling the go-ahead for Europe's fleet of MetOp Second Generation weather satellites were signed by Volker Liebig, ESA Director of Earth Observation Programs, and Michael Menking, Head of Airbus Defence & Space's Earth Observation, Navigation and Science Programs in the presence of the German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the Berlin Air Show. - With the first contractual documents now signed, the ‘A' satellites will be developed and built by Airbus Defence and Space in Toulouse, France, while the ‘B' satellites will be developed and built at the company's facilities in Friedrichshafen, Germany. However, under the leadership of Airbus Defence and Space, a large industrial consortium of many different companies around Europe will be involved. 5) 6)
MetOp-SG encompasses the objective of obtaining consistent, long-term collection of remotely sensed data of uniform quality for operational services for meteorology and climate monitoring state analysis, forecasting and operational service provision, in the context of the EUMETSAT's EPS-SG system.
The MetOp-SG program is being implemented in collaboration with EUMETSAT. ESA develops the prototype MetOp-SG satellites (including associated instruments) and procures, on behalf of EUMETSAT, the recurrent satellites (and associated instruments). EUMETSAT is responsible for the overall mission, funds the recurrent satellites, develops the ground segment, procures the launch and LEOP services and performs the satellites operations. The corresponding EUMETSAT Program is termed EPS-SG (EUMETSAT Polar System – Second Generation).
On October 16, 2014, contracts were signed to build three pairs of MetOp Second Generation satellites, ensuring the continuity of essential information for global weather forecasting and climate monitoring for decades to come. Airbus Defence and Space of France now takes up the role as prime contractor for the A satellites and Airbus Defence and Space of Germany for the B series. Although the different satellites will be developed and built in Toulouse, France and Friedrichshafen, Germany, respectively, a large industrial consortium of many European companies will be involved under the leadership of Airbus Defence and Space. 9)
New instruments observing extended spectral and frequency ranges will allow new environmental measurements to be collected. In addition, the A series will carry the Copernicus Sentinel-5 instrument on behalf of the European Commission. Sentinel-5 includes five ‘spectrometers' from the ultraviolet to the shortwave infrared, to monitor atmospheric composition and support the forecasting of air quality.
• On 15 December 2016, Europe and the US achieved another milestone in the cooperation on meteorological satellite systems when Marc Cohen, EUMETSAT Associate Director for LEO Programs and Harry A. Cikanek III, NOAA Director, Joint Polar Satellite System, signed the plan that will implement the JPS (Joint Polar System). 10)
- The PIP (Polar System Program Implementation Plan) encompasses the space and ground segments associated with EUMETSAT's EPS-SG (Polar System Second Generation) and the Joint Polar Satellite System of NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). It also regulates the use of assets and operations as well as access to third party mission products such as the Copernicus Earth Observation Program of the EU and the NOAA COSMIC (Constellation Observing System for Meteorology Ionosphere and Climate) and follow-on partnerships.
- The JPS extends to a new generation of polar-orbiting satellites the cooperation established since 1998 on the IJPS (Initial Joint Polar System) which builds on EUMETSAT's MetOp and NOAA's POES and Suomi-NPP satellites. — The agreement on the JPS was signed on 2 December 2015, between the EUMETSAT Director-General Alain Ratier and Stephen Volz, NOAA Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services.
- JPS can be considered as a ‘system of systems', with each party responsible for designing, sizing, and operating their own space and ground assets to meet their mission needs. At the same time, the partners have agreed to exploit those assets in a way that optimizes cross-support to the other party. Data and products generated by each party will be distributed to their own user community and will be available for access by the other party. Each party will fulfill its responsibilities on a best effort basis, taking into account schedule and funding constraints.
- Marc Cohen, Associate Director EUMETSAT said, "JPS is designed to provide observations from two complementary polar orbits in the period from 2020 to 2040. The Implementation Plan we have now signed will translate our designs into action."
• MetOp-Second Generation is a follow-on system to the first generation series of MetOp (Meteorological Operational) satellites, which currently provide operational meteorological observations from polar orbit.
• MetOp-SG is a collaborative program between ESA and EUMETSAT, similar to the previous successful cooperations between the two organizations.
• ESA is responsible for the development of the prototype satellites and, on behalf of EUMETSAT, for the procurement of the recurrent satellites.
• EUMETSAT is responsible for overall user requirements, procurement of the launchers and LEOP services, development of the ground segment and also performs the operations.
• ESA funding comes from the ESA MetOp-SG Program, which was approved at the ESA Council at Ministerial Level in November 2012.
• EUMETSAT funding will come from the EUMETSAT Polar System Second Generation (EPS-SG) Program, which is currently in the final stages of approval (Poland has already approved the Program).
Overall MetOp-SG Objectives
• To provide operational observations and measurements from polar orbit for numerical weather prediction and climate monitoring in the 2020 to mid-2040's timeframe.
• In addition, to provide services to atmospheric chemistry, operational oceanography and hydrology.
• With respect to the first generation of MetOp satellites:
- to ensure continuity of essential operational meteorological observations from polar orbit, without a gap
- to improve the accuracy / resolution / dynamic range of the measurements (e.g. MWS, RO, SCA as well as METimage, IASI-NG, Sentinel-5)
- to add new measurements / missions (e.g. 3MI, MWI, ICI as well as Sentinel-5).
• MetOp-SG consists of two series of satellites (termed Satellite A and Satellite B), with three satellites in each series (3+3 configuration).
• A total of ten different instruments will be flown across the two satellites.
• Six instruments are developed as part of the MetOp-SG Program (Contractor Provided Item or CPI instruments):
- MWS (MicroWave Sounder)
- MWI (MicroWave Imager)
- ICI (Ice Cloud Imager)
- SCA (SCAtterometer)
- 3MI (Multi-viewing, Multi-channel, Multi-polarization Imager)
- RO (Radio Occultation sounder)
• Four instruments are Customer Furnished Items or CFIs (Sentinel-5 from ESA / EU Copernicus Program, METimage from DLR, and IASI-NG and Argos-4 from CNES) and are NOT the subject of this briefing.
• The ground segment development is the responsibility of EUMETSAT and is also NOT the subject of this briefing (Ref. 11).
A two-satellite architecture has been selected for MetOp-SG by ESA and EUMETSAT, namely MetOp-SG- A and -B, flying in the same sun-synchronous orbit. Unlike the current MetOp system of identical satellites operating in a relay, the MetOp-SG system envisages a pair of different satellites, each carrying a different but complementary suite of instruments. This will comprise a mix of instruments offering data continuity with improved performance and new instruments to meet the evolving demands of the meteorological community.
Altogether, the new MetOp-SG system concept features six satellites; the launch of the first one is planned for 2020. The overall system lifetime is 21 years, with each satellite designed to exceed an eight and a half year lifetime.
On October 17, 2014, Airbus Defence and Space signed formal contracts with ESA to design and manufacture of six MetOp-SG satellites. 13)
Figure 1: Artist's rendition of the MetOp-SG spacecraft in orbit (image credit: ESA)
Figure 2: Illustration of the MetOp-SG satellites (image credit: ESA, Ref. 11)
Table 2: MetOp-SG key parameters
EPS-SG Direct Broadcast: 14)
• Roughly 20-fold increase of sensing data rates from EPS to EPS-SG, with a corresponding increase in global and direct broadcast data rates
• Direct broadcast data rates will be 80 Mbit/s, making it impossible to remain in L-band as per EPS. The X-band has been chosen instead; The L-band will not be supported on the MetOp-SG satellites
• Satellite A has a much higher peak data rate than Satellite B, but both satellites will have exactly the same direct broadcast data rates (filler data to be inserted on Satellite B)
• In routine operations, Satellite B will be flying about 90° / 25 minutes ahead of Satellite A. MetOp satellites will also be flying in the same orbit, with MetOp-C nominally at 90° after MetOp-SG A1 until its deorbiting.
Table 3: EPS-SG direct broadcast key parameters
• The parameter G/T is the main driver for the Reception Station Performance Requirements. For EPS-SG, the plan is to match the NPP requirement
• The G/T depends on the full chain of equipment including antenna dish quality and size, antenna tracking performance, feed, LNA, cabling, etc
• With good quality equipment, the required G/T can be achieved with a 2.4m antenna dish. To add additional margins for severe weather conditions and to mitigate potential local RF interference, a larger dish size may be chosen.
Figure 3: MetOp-SG industrial consortia (image credit: ESA, Ref. 6)
• November 18, 2016: Airbus Defence and Space has awarded the Communications & Medical Products Division of Communications & Power Industries (CPI) an 8.7 million euro (approximately $9.5 million) to support a new generation of satellites that is expected to provide global advanced meteorological data from 2021 until after 2040. 15)
- Under the contract, CPI will develop several engineering and flight models of 5.355 GHzEIKs ( Extended Interaction Klystrons). CPI's EIKs are vital to the Scatterometer (SCA) radar instrument, creating the high-power microwaves required for the instrument to measure surface winds over the ocean. This information is expected to play an important role in numerical weather prediction, climate monitoring and the tracking of extreme weather events. In addition, the Scatterometer will provide data on soil moisture, snow cover, sea ice and other valuable environmental measures. Work on this program will take place at CPI's facilities in Georgetown, Ontario, Canada. CPI will deliver flight models beginning in 2019.
• On Sept. 20, 2016, DLR awarded a contract to Airbus DS for the design, construction and testing of the radiometer. 16) 17) — Within 1.7 seconds, a 12 km wide and 2,670 km long swath of the Earth's surface is observed using a scan mirror oriented perpendicular to the flight direction (Figure 4). Three sensors, two of which are infrared sensors operating at cryogenic temperatures of below -210°C, deliver the 20 channels of data. With 26 different components, METimage is one of the most complex instruments Airbus Defence and Space is working on.
• Dec. 8, 2015: EUMETSAT and CNES signed a cooperation agreement for the development of a new generation of IASI-NG (Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometers). Under the new agreement, CNES will develop the full IASI-NG system composed of the instrument and the data processing chain, procure recurrent instruments on behalf of EUMETSAT and provide support to operations. 18)
- EUMETSAT will fund 30% of the development costs for the first instrument and the recurrent instruments in full, integrate the IASI-NG data processing chain in its operational ground systems and exploit the IASI-NG instrument chain throughout the lifetime of the EPS-SG system.
• October 5, 2015: EUMETSAT and ESA signed a cooperation agreement that secures the development of the MetOp Second Generation satellites which form the space segment of the EUMETSAT Polar System of Second Generation. 19)
Table 4: MetOp-SG Status as of May 2015
Figure 5: Overall MetOp-SG schedule (Ref. 11)
Launch: Each MetOp-SG satellite will be launched separately. It is envisaged that the first A satellite will be launched in 2021, followed by the first B satellite in 2022 (Ref. 9).
Orbit: The MetOp-SG satellites will orbit Earth in a sun-synchronous orbit at a mean altitude of ~835 km to provide global coverage, LTDN (Local Time on Descending Node) = 09:30 hours. Identical orbit as for EPS ⇒ shared orbit between MetOp and MetOp-SG satellites.
Since 2006, the European contribution to operational meteorological observations from polar orbit has been provided by the first generation of Meteorological Operational (MetOp) satellites. The MetOp-SG (MetOp Second Generation) series of satellites will provide continuity and enhancement of these observations in the timeframe of 2020 to 2040.
• METimage (Meteorological Imager), to provide information on clouds, cloud cover, land surface properties, sea, ice and land surface temperatures, etc. The METimage instrument is provided by DLR via EUMETSAT.
• IASI-NG (Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer–New Generation), to provide atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles, as well as monitor ozone and various trace gases. IASI-NG is provided by CNES via EUMETSAT.
• MWS (MicroWave Sounder), to provide atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles. MWS is provided by ESA
• SCA (Scatterometer), to provide ocean surface wind vectors and land surface soil moisture. SCA is provided by ESA.
• RO (Radio Occultation sounder), to provide atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles, as well as information about the ionosphere. RO is provided by ESA.
• UVNS/S5 (Ultra-Violet /Visible/Near Infrared/Short Wave Infrared spectrometer -Sentinel-5) instrument, to monitor various trace gases, air quality and support climate monitoring. Sentinel-5 is provided by ESA.
• MWI (MicroWave Imager), to provide precipitation monitoring as well as sea ice extent information. MWI is provided by ESA.
• ICI (Ice and Cloud Imager), to measure cloud ice water path, properties and altitude. ICI is provided by ESA.
• 3MI (Multi-viewing, Multi-channel, Multi-polarization Imager), to provide information on atmospheric aerosols
• DCS (Data Collection System) Argos-4, for the collection and transmission of observations and data from surface, buoy, ship, balloon or airborne data collection platforms. DCS is provided by CNES via EUMETSAT.
ESA is responsible for design/development of the following 6 instruments within the MetOp-SG program: MWS, SCA, RO, MWI, ICI and 3MI. The Sentinel-5 instrument (UVNS/S5) is developed by ESA under the Copernicus Program, formerly GSC (GMES Space Component) program. The other instruments are provided through EUMETSAT under cooperation agreements with its partners DLR, CNES and NOAA and will be provided as Customer Furnished Items to the MetOp-SG contractor.
ICI (Ice Cloud Imager)
The ICI instrument is a total power millimeter and sub-millimeter wave conically scanning radiometer, providing brightness temperature measurements in 11 channels, two of them dual-pol, ranging from 183 GHz up to 664 GHz. ICI is designed to monitor the exchange mechanisms in Earth's upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, and focusing in particular on the remote sensing of high altitude ice clouds using several heterodyne receiver channels centered at 183 GHz, 243 GHz, 325 GHz, 448 GHz and 664 GHz, with two window channels (243 GHz and 664 GHz) measured at both V and H polarization. In recent years, several ESA funded activities have been aimed at further advancing the maturity of sub-millimeter wave Schottky technology in Europe in order to fulfil the ICI stringent requirements (Ref. 33). 23) 24) 25) 26)
Airbus DS-CASA Espacio, Spain (former EADS CASA Espacio) was selected by ESA (European Space Agency) as the prime contractor of the ICI instrument. Airbus DS SAS (France), RPG and CRISA are part of the industrial core team as well. Even if the technique to measure ice clouds was already proposed in 1995, this sub-millimeterwave imager will be the first radiometer of its kind ever developed for Earth observation from space.
Figure 6: The submillimeter spectrum of a clear-sky and a cloudy mid-latitude winter atmosphere, with bars indicating the positions of the prototype instrument channels. A homogeneous cloud was assumed from 8 to 10 km with an IWC of 0.04 g m-3, consisting of spherical ice particles with 100 µm radius. The widths of the pass bands are drawn smaller than in reality so that the individual channels can be distinguished (image credit: S. A. Buehler, et al.) 27)
The ICI radiometer rotates at a constant speed of 45 rpm, providing Earth scene measurements to over an azimuth range of ±65º, with an incidence angle of around 53º and a projected footprint of 15 km for all channels. All footprints are sampled at Nyquist, providing a good image quality capability. The channels at 243 GHz and 664 GHz are measured at V and H polarizations, while all other channels are measured in V polarization. Hot and Cold calibrations are performed periodically at each rotation.
The ICI instrument onboard the MetOp-SG-B series will include several receiver channels that cover part of the millimeter and part of the sub-millimeter wave range, at center frequencies of 183 GHz, 243 GHz, 325 GHz, 448 GHz and 664 GHz. A lot of results have already been obtained up to 325 GHz, as discrete devices can be used in this frequency range without major limitation or performance degradation compared to integrated MMIC devices. At 448 GHz, it is expected that both discrete and integrated mixer devices will give a similar performance. The decision factor might come from repeatability issues during mounting and eventually stress tests. A schematic of a 448 GHz receiver frontend is shown in Figure 7 on the left hand side. It includes a medium power 224 GHz doubler, a 448 GHz sub-harmonic mixer and an IF Low Noise Amplifier (LNA).
Figure 7: Left hand side: schematic of a 448 GHz receiver front-end including a 224 GHz medium power doubler and a 448 GHz sub-harmonic mixer with IF LNA. Right hand side: schematic of a 664 GHz receiver front-end including a 166 GHz high power doubler, a 332 GHz medium power doubler, and a 664 GHz sub-harmonic mixer with IF LNA (image credit: ESA)
Table 5: Specification of the ICI channels
While the rotating part has to be external to the platform, the fixed part can be accommodated either internally or externally to the platform. The advantage of having the fixed part placed inside the platform is the reduction of instrument envelope that makes it easier to manage the ICI payload accommodation.
The moving part is rotated about the axis of the instrument by a coaxially mounted motor and it includes the reflector and feed horns that are mounted on a "drum" which contains the receivers, a digital processing unit and a power supply unit.
Contrary to traditional conical scanners, ICI will be mounted on the nadir side of the spacecraft. The 183 GHz channel selection overlaps with the one of MWI, allowing a cross-calibration between the two instruments.
Table 6: Some parameters of the ICI instrument 28)
Figure 8: Scanning geometry and measurement/calibration sectors (image credit: Airbus DS-CASA Espacio)
Figure 9: Rotating (top) and fixed (bottom) parts, and antenna geometry (image credit: Airbus DS-CASA Espacio)
MWI (MicroWave Imager):
MWI is a conically scanning total power microwave radiometer (antenna size of ~ 75 cm), an imager which rotates continuously about an axis parallel to the local spacecraft vertical with an active portion of the scan of > ±65º centered on the fore (or afterward) direction of the spacecraft. The antenna system will view an Earth scene with a nearly constant incidence angle ,or OZA (Observation Zenith Angle), of ~53º±2º. 29) 30)
The instrument is providing a total number of 26 channels (including dual polarization channels). The MWI frequency coverage is from 18 GHz up to 183 GHz. Table 7 shows the MWI channels, utilization purpose and NEΔT. All MWI channels up to 89 GHz are measured with both V- and H polarizations. Channels above 89 GHz are measured at V polarization only (Ref. 33).
The main goal of the MWI is to serve operational meteorology, oceanography, sea-ice/snow/land surface observation and climate applications. The MWI will provide continuity of other key microwave imager channels (e.g., SSM/I, TRMM TMI, SSMIS, AMSRE, AMSR-2, GMI) in support of long-term climate records.
The main objective of the MWI is to measure precipitation. In addition, MWI provides measurements of cloud products, water vapor and temperature profiles and surface imagery. MWI supports NWP (Numerical Weather Prediction) at regional and global scales. MWI has a moderate antenna size providing on-ground footprints ranging from 50 km down to 10 km, depending on frequency. The smallest antenna footprint defines the minimum rotation cycle, and footprint overlap is present also for highest frequencies due to the high rotation rate (45 rpm). This guarantees a good image quality and even Nyquist spatial sampling at the lowest frequency channels.
The relatively small antenna of MWI does not require deployment mechanism and enables a complete sun shield around the instrument to protect from sun-intrusions.
Additional features of MWI include RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) mitigation at the lowest frequency channel and internal calibration targets to complement traditional external targets. RFI mitigation is done by dividing the measured signal spatially, spectrally and temporally and detecting non-Gaussian (man-made) signals and removing them from the data. Internal calibration targets will be implemented at the lowest frequency channels, providing improvement of orbital stability of the instrument.
Instrument: The MWI instrument consists of a fixed part and a rotating part. The moving part is rotated about the axis of the instrument by a coaxially mounted motor and it includes the reflector and feed horns that are mounted on a "drum" which contains the receivers, a digital processing unit and a power supply unit.
The scan mechanism assembly provides the rotation of the instrument and acts as mechanical and electrical interface between the fixed and rotating part. All data, commands, timing and telemetry signals, and power, pass through the rotating part to the fixed part via the PSTD (Power and Signal Transfer Device). A DSCE (Dedicated Scan Control Electronics) device is included for the control of the scan mechanism.
The fixed part of the instrument comprises the assembly of scan mechanism (which locates the scan motor, an angular position encoder, mechanical unbalance sensors, various electronics including the control of scan and balance functions), and allocates the units interfacing with the platform (power supply connected to the platform power bus and a control/processing unit which links respectively with the platform command & telemetry bus and the platform science data bus).
A fixed rod through the scan assembly, emerging above the rotating drum upper plane, is providing off axis mechanical support in a fixed position for the two calibration targets that consist of a small reflector and a hot blackbody load, which once per rotation illuminates the feed horns obscuring them from the view of the main reflector.
Figure 10: MWI main elements (image credit: Airbus DS, CGS)
Legend: A) Tube Structure, B) Rotating Deck, C) Baseplate Cover, D) Baseplate, 1) Main Reflector, 2) Frontend Subassembly, 3) Calibration Assembly, 4) Receiver Backends, Electronics and CDPU, 5) Scan Mechanism, 6) Launch Lock Devices.
To achieve very good radiometric accuracy and stability, the MWI is designed with a sun-shield (tube structure) to minimize sun-intrusion on the instrument units. MWI is calibrated using an internal hot target and a cold sky, which is viewed through a dedicated antenna reflector. The calibration targets, a CCR (Cold sky Calibration Reflector) and the on-board HL (Hot Load),are accommodated in such a way that the CCR is constantly pointing to the deep space on the opposite side of the sun direction. The CCR and the HL calibration devices are viewed once every rotation cycle. A specific baffle is included around the OBCT (On-Board Calibration Target) to eliminate sun intrusion into the target. In addition, 4-point calibration is used for the lowest frequency channels by means of noise diodes.
Figure 11: Block diagram of the MWI architecture (image credit: Airbus DS, CGS)
MWI includes a mixture of direct detection and heterodyne receiver architectures. Low noise amplifiers are foreseen to be used as first element of the receiver. For highest frequency channels (166 GHz and 183 GHz), Schottky-based mixers and multipliers are foreseen. For lower frequencies, several technologies are still possible from discrete components to fully integrated MMIC receiver. For all heterodyne receivers, frontends and backends are separated to optimize the accommodation and thermal dissipation.
MWI provides a robust design as required for an operational instrument. The MWI includes stringent input filtering before the receiver at the lowest channels up to 31 GHz to provide protection against RFI (Radio Frequency Interference). An RFI processor at 18.7 GHz is also included to detect and mitigate interference on-board.
The MWI instrument has high failure detection and recovery autonomy. The ICU will automatically switch ON/OFF subsystems in case of SEEs (Single Event Effects). In case of hardware failures, MWI will have a capability to shut down each channel individually and keep the other channels still operational. The MWI instrument is designed to guarantee very good reliability and availability for the whole lifetime of 7.5 years. For key electronics on both the rotating and fixed part, full redundancy is included.
Figure 12: Mechanical layout of MWI radiometer (image credit: Airbus DS, CGS)
The structural design and the adopted materials of the rotating assembly shall be such to optimize the stiffness to mass ratio and minimize the in orbit mechanical and thermal distortions.
Technology challenges: To guarantee the performance and reliability of the mission, many technological challenges exist. One of the most critical elements of the MWI instrument is the scan mechanism assembly. The criticality of this element is mainly due to the very high number of revolutions to be performed within the instrument lifetime, which are in the order of 180 million cycles. Other critical functions of this subsystem are the power transfer (in the order of 200 W), the pointing accuracy and the repeatability of the release after launch. Breadboard developments of this critical subsystem are currently ongoing.
On the other hand, the required performances obviously need improvements in semiconductor technologies, which have recently been finished successfully. In addition to performance, the reliability of components is a key factor for the MWI instrument and for the in-orbit nominal lifetime of 7.5 years for the MetOp-SG mission, combined with a maximum of 19 years of in -storage period; these requirements were not seen before. For critical semiconductor technologies (receiver front-ends), reliability testing is already on-going to make sure that the components will be able to withstand the environment. Temperature + DC & RF step stress tests, storage + DC & RF life tests, humidity and environmental tests are being performed to all non-hermetic components.
In the timeframe 2021-2042, the MWI instrument is required to support NWP activities at regional and global scales, by providing high quality operational cloud and precipitation observations, snow and sea-ice coverage as well as gross profiles of water vapor and temperature.
Figure 13: Scan geometry of the MWI instrument (image credit: EUMETSAT, Ref. 20)
• In Nov. 2014, Airbus DS GmbH awarded a contract to CGS (Carlo Gavazzi Space) S.p.A, Milan, Italy for the realization of the MWI instrument of the MetOp Second Generation satellites. CGS is a unit of OHB AG. The MWI is a sophisticated instrument that will be installed on board the MetOp-SG-B satellite series and provide Europe's National Meteorological Services and, by extension, the international users and Science Community, with unprecedented and high-value data for meteorological and climate monitoring. By signing this contract, which has a total volume of € 134 million, CGS will assume responsibility for the design and the development of the MWI instrument, from Phase B2 to the final in-orbit verification of three flight models, to be supplied to Airbus DS GmbH, the prime contractor of the MetOp-SG-B satellite series. 31)
MWS (Microwave Sounding Mission):
MWS is a total power radiometer with the goal to measure the brightness temperature, at various altitudes, and delivering calibrated and geo-located atmospheric temperature and water-vapor sounding data, in all weather and illumination conditions, this instrument will be a key element in the provision of operational meteorological data over the next two decades. By offering significant improvements in measurement performance over the MetOp First Generation instruments and indeed all microwave sounders currently operating on meteorological satellites, MWS offers a significant upgrade to input data for the operational NWP (Numerical Weather Prediction) service. 32)
The MWS is an cross-track scanning microwave radiometer, measuring the total power, atmospheric brightness temperature in 24 channels over the frequency range from 23.8 GHz up to 229 GHz. In recognition of the significance of the temperature sounding data, the channels (50 GHz – 58 GHz) are fully redundant. The instrument provides measurements of temperature and humidity (water vapor) profiles and total liquid water columns. These are key parameters for Numerical Weather Microwave soundings, which greatly enhance the ability of the various NMS (National Meteorological Services) to initialize global and regional NWP models with realistic information on temperature and moisture. The frequent availability of detailed temperature and moisture soundings would also contribute to fulfil other key requirements common to NWC (Now Casting) and very short range weather forecasting at regional scales. 33)
The MWS measurement principle is essentially similar to that of predecessor instruments (e.g. MHS, AMSU), the main difference being the inclusion of the complete range of radiometric frequency channels within a single instrument with a single main antenna. One particular difference is that the two lowest frequency channels (MWS-1 and MWS-2) will be over-sampled with respect to the footprint in the scanning direction, in order to allow the possibility of filtering out RFI (Radio Frequency Interference). The principle mode of operation, as before, uses a scanning antenna. This rotates every 2½ seconds, sampling the atmosphere below (to 49° each side). Each rotation also views a warm OBCT (On-Board Calibration Target) and the cold sky. The antenna rotates at non-uniform speed as shown in Figure 14 in order to maximize the scene and calibration targets integration times.
The single antenna concept allows the MWS instrument to remain compact but requires a complex QON (Quasi-Optical Network) capable of splitting the different channels in the instrument. A fixed, parabolic sub-reflector is used to fold the signal into the QON.
All MWS measurements are performed with a single polarization (QV or QH). The instrument will have a 40 km footprint at the lowest frequencies leading to an antenna size of ~35 cm. The footprint at highest frequency channels will be 17 km. The sampling distance on the ground is defined by the highest frequency channels.
The instrument design is a single unit, single antenna concept. The large frequency range required infers a stringent requirement to the MWS quasi-optical network, which must be able to handle this frequency range. The first electrical demonstrator of the QON has been built and measured losses are typically below 0.3 dB for all channels. Table 8 shows the predicted NEΔT values for each channel in nominal conditions at BOL (Beginning of Life). The predicted radiometric accuracy (RSS) is below 1 K for all channels, the inter-channel accuracy is better than 0.5 K and the inter-pixel accuracy <0.3 K (at 280 K reference scene). An orbital stability of better than 0.2 K is targeted. The beam efficiency is between 95% and 99%, depending on channel.
Table 9: Comparison of instrument footprints
The QON separates the incoming radiation from the antenna system into 6 separate frequency bands. The signal is split out through the use of dichroics or splitters and transfers the separated frequencies to the RF feed horns coupled to the receiver front ends, specific for the different channels. This is illustrated in Figure 15.
MWS includes a mixture of direct detection and heterodyne receivers, which comprise the front end receiver elements. Those channels not employing direct detection down-convert and amplify the signals, sending them to the backend electronics for further down-conversion and filtering. Finally the analog data is passed to the ICU (Instrument Control Unit) for digitization and downlink.
Key design features of MWS. The instrument has been divided into the following functional blocks:
- RSA (Reflector and Shroud Assembly): The reflector is a scanning flat mirror which collects the microwave energy from the Earth scene and calibration targets and directs it into the QON (Quasi-Optics Network). The shroud limits stray radiation entering the QON.
- SM (Scan Mechanism) and SCE (Scan Control Electronics): The SM rotates the reflector across the scenes and targets at a uniform velocity. The reflector rapidly accelerates and decelerates between the scenes and targets in order to maximize the time spent looking at them. The SCE provides the power and electronics control necessary to achieve the required scan profile.
The SM and the SCE form a single functional block which drives the reflector in the required scan profile under closed loop control, with only a simple start and stop command required from the ICU and its software. This has the advantage that the scan control function can be designed, developed and tested independently of the ICU and its software. On MHS, scan control could not be tested until the Scan Mechanism, ICU and its software were integrated.
- QON (Quasi Optics Network): This consists of a parabolic sub-reflector, a set of dichroic and polarizing mirrors and lenses to direct the radiation from the reflector into 5 separate feed horns.
- Rx FE (Receiver Frontends): This consists of 7 separate receivers for the different frequency groups of MWS. Three channels are direct detection receivers which directly filter the required channel frequencies and provide the detection and video amplification. The remaining four receivers are superheterodyne receivers which perform the down-conversion to generate an IF signal for the receiver backends. One of these receivers covers the 54 GHz channels and is cold redundant.
- Rx BE (Receiver Backends): These provide a total of 21 channel filters, detectors and video amplifiers for the superheterodyne channels.
- SPE (Signal Processing Electronics): This performs the digitization of the 24 receiver video signals. Each channel has programmable gain and offset adjustment to optimize the signal to the ADC dynamic range.
- Packetization: This collects the digitized data from the SPE and formats it into the required packet format for transmission to the spacecraft over a SpaceWire Bus.
- Instrument Control and Monitoring: This accepts telecommands from the spacecraft via the SpaceWire Bus and performs the necessary commanded functions. It collects housekeeping data from the instrument subsystems and transmits them to the spacecraft via the SpaceWire Bus. It also performs monitoring of the instrument health and implements the necessary recovery actions in the event of an anomaly (FDIR).
- Power Conversion and Distribution: This generates the required power rails for the instrument from the spacecraft primary power buses. It also switches and distributes the power to the different functions.
- Mechanical Structure and Harness: This includes the baseplate and support brackets for the instrument equipment. The harness provides the power and signal connections between the various equipment.
- Thermal Control: This provides thermal control in the normal operating modes and in safe mode using heaters and surfaces covered in SSM (Second Surface Mirrors) or MLI (Multilayer Insulation).
Figure 16: Configuration of the MWS instrument (image credit: Airbus Defence and Space)
The MWS radiometer is designed and developed by Airbus Defence and Space Ltd, Portsmouth, UK, leading a core team of industrial partners: TAS-UK, Airbus DS GmbH and Airbus DS SAS.
SCA (Scatterometer Mission):
The Scatterometer (SCA) is one of the high priority payload instruments to provide vector surface wind observations over ocean, which constitute an important input to the NWP (Numerical Weather Prediction) as well as valuable information for tracking of extreme weather events. The secondary products derived from the scatterometer data are: 34)
- Land surface soil moisture
- Leaf area index
- Snow water equivalent
- Snow cover
- Sea-ice type
- Sea-ice extent.
Instrument requirements: The SCA instrument is a real-aperture, pulsed imaging radar with six fixed fan beam-antennas. In this configuration, the principal elevation planes of the SCA antenna beams are oriented at 45º (Fore-left), 90º (Mid-left), 135º (Aft-left), 225º (Aft-right), 270º (Mid-right) and 315º (Fore-right) with respect to the flight direction, similar to MetOp's ASCAT (Figure 18).
Each of the SCA beams shall acquire a continuous image of the normalized (per-unit-surface) radar backscatter coefficient of the ocean surface, called σο over a swath. Both sides of the subsatellite track are imaged each with three azimuth views, with an unavoidable observation gap below the satellite. A large number of independent looks are summed in range and azimuth (multi-looking), for each azimuth view, in order to achieve the specified radiometric resolution of the σο estimate on each measurement pixel.
The three σο measurements (σο triplet) are uniquely related to the 10 m vector wind through the GMF (Geophysical Model Function. The wind inversion is based on a search for minimum distances between the measured σο triplet and all the backscatter model solutions lying on the GMF surface, taking into account instrumental and geophysical noise sources . Due to measurement noise, multiple solutions are usually found (wind ambiguities), which have to be filtered out using the background wind information provided by a NWP model (ambiguity removal).
Figure 17: Illustration of the SCA instrument (image credit: ESA)
As compared to ASCAT, SCA shall have a smaller nadir gap by reducing the minimum incidence angle from 25º (ASCAT) to 20º. The main technical requirements of SCA are reported in Table 10 and compared to the ones of ASCAT. The major improvements to be brought by SCA with respect to ASCAT are the spatial resolution of 25 km x 25 km, the radiometric stability of ≤ 0.1 dB and the addition of VH polarization measurements on the mid beams.
Instrument design: The SCA instrument has 6 antennas, 3 on both sides of the satellite ground-track. All antennas emit in vertical polarization. The 4 side antennas receive only vertically polarized signals, whereas the 2 mid antennas receive both V and H-polarized signals. For the mid antennas, two different concepts are under investigation: simultaneous / non- simultaneous reception of V and H-pol signals. The antennas consist of slotted waveguide arrays, connected through waveguides to the beam-switching matrix. For the Fore-/Aft-antenna assemblies, rotating RF-joints are required for enabling deployment.
The SCA antennas are considered a key component of the instrument, as they have direct impact on performance figures like e.g. radiometric stability. Their stability is therefore considered of utmost importance. The design of the SCA antennas is based on a aluminum support structure and RF elements are also made of aluminum.
A high level SCA block diagram is depicted in Figure 19. The baseband radar pulse is stored in the digital memory read-out and followed by the DAC (Digital-to-Analog Converter). The analog pulse is then up-converted to the carrier frequency by a quadrature mixer. The HPA (High Power Amplifier) is driven by a high voltage EPC (Electronics Power Conditioner). The HPA feeds the six antennas sequentially through the beam-switching matrix. The receive signal is amplified by the LNA (Low Noise Amplifier) and down-converted to the in-phase (I) and quadrature phase (Q) baseband signals. The digitized I and Q baseband signals are downlinked and further processed on ground.
An internal calibration loop measures the transmit pulses at the output of the HPA and that of the beam-switching matrix. The calibration pulses are also injected at the input of the beam-switching matrix and measured at the input of the LNA. Those measurements enable gain characterization of the transmit- and receive-chains, as well as losses of the components in the radar front-end. The necessity of measuring the pulses at the input ports of the antennas is a subject of further analysis in relation to meeting the radiometric stability requirement.
The instrument also measures the thermal noise in the absence of radar echo for determining the background noise level. After the noise estimation on ground, noise subtraction is performed for determining the unbiased ocean surface radar cross-section.
Two possible implementation configurations have been studied for the SCA instrument. These configurations are characterized by the presence of 6 slotted wave guide array antennas. Table 11 summarizes the instrument budgets. The ranges correspond to the budgets of the two concepts.
The use of a short, chirp-modulated transmit pulse was assumed for the design optimization. The optimization of the pulse length, taking into account the feasibility of the high power amplifier, has been subject of trade-offs in Phase A.
Instrument performance: The GMF (Geophysical Model Function) is an empirically derived function that relates backscatter measurements to surface wind vectors and viewing geometries in the form of σο= GMF (incidence angle, azimuth angle, wind vector). For C-band VV simulations, the project uses the CMOD5 model for ocean backscatter, which is valid for incidence angles ranging from 18 to 58º. For VH simulations, the project uses an empirical model function derived from the last RADARSAT-2 mission and from the NOAA SFMR (Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer) flight campaigns in VH polarization over hurricanes. These campaigns confirmed a linear tendency of σοVH with the wind-speed (as depicted in Figure 20) and a low sensitivity to both incidence and azimuth angles.
External calibration approach: The SCA timing is based on the use of transmission pulses which are much shorter than those of ASCAT (600 µs against 8.5 ms and 10.8 ms respectively). For sake of clarity, the SCA TX/RX timing is shown in Figure 21. The essential difference is that the transmit pulse length is now shorter than the noise measurement window. Therefore reception of a transponder response can, in principle, be accommodated within the noise measurement window. This window is ideally suited for calibration reception, as it is not contaminated by clutter. If a time delaying transponder is set-up to inject its signal into the noise measurement slot, then a transparent calibration method can be implemented.
For the transparent calibration, it is only necessary that the ground processing is aware of the presence of the transponder echoes within the noise window. Since SCA does not use an on-board processing, it is not necessary that the on-board software is aware of the presence of calibration signals. In the ground processor, the noise data packets containing transponder echoes will be separated from the nominal noise data stream and processed separately. The calibration processing is mostly identical to the ASCAT calibration processing, with the exception that signal demodulation and timing has to be adapted to SCA. Transponder echoes are present in the noise window for about 10 s per over flight. This is a small time interval when compared with 150 s noise integration time employed in the nominal ground processing. Therefore, there is no specific need to compensate for the lost noise measurements.
With the external calibration being transparent to the space segment, it is possible to continuously acquire calibration data and decide when new sets of calibration data need to be injected into the level 1b processor. Explicit calibration campaigns would no longer be needed. In principle, more than one transponder echo (up to three) could be received at the same time, when the transponders are aligned along the direction of an antenna footprint. As it can be seen from Figure 21, the duration of the noise window can easily be extended without impact on the overall timing concept if a larger margin for timing tolerances is desired.
Instrument description: The SCA is a real aperture C-band (5.355 GHz) radar system which is a follow up of the ASCAT system developed in the late 90's. It is subdivided into the SAS (SCA Antenna Subsystem) and the SES (SCA Electronic Subsystem). The SCA Instrument is being developed by Airbus DS in Germany and in Spain. 35)
SAS (SCA Antenna Subsystem) is composed of 6 slotted waveguide antennas accommodated on three roof-top shaped antenna assemblies. The antennas comprise 2 dual polarized (H&V) and 4 single polarized (V) antennas, which generate narrow beams with low sidelobes in the azimuth (along track) direction and fan beams in the elevation (across track) direction. Each of the SAS arrays is connected to a switching front-end unit (SFE) which selects the operating antenna according the radar operating principle.
SAS is organized in a lambda configuration distributed on 3 antenna assemblies, called MAA (Mid Antenna Assembly) which holds the Mid left and right dual polarized antennas and Side Antenna Assemblies (SAA+Y and SAA-Y) which hold the Fore and Aft right and left array antennas.
The dimensions of the deployable antenna structure are of about 2m x 3.9m in stowed and 7 m x 6 m in deployed with a total mass of approximately 430 kg.
Figure 22: Illustration of the deployed SAS (image credit: Airbus DS, former EADS CASA Espacio)
The main SAS elements are the following:
• MAA (Mid Antenna Assembly), which hosts dual polarized antenna panels and the two deployable Side Antenna Assemblies SAA+Y and SAA-Y that host V-polarized antenna panels.
• HDRMs (Hold Down and Release Mechanisms). The HDRMs are released by NEAs (Non Explosive Actuators).
• DLM (Deployment and Latch Mechanism) that are in charge of the deployment of the two SAA arms after release of the HDRMs.
• The Mechanical Support Structure comprising a U-shaped Baseplate Panel Structure and the Hold Down Release Mechanism Structure.
• The thermal hardware made of SLI (Single Layer Insulation) and MLI (Multi Layer Insulation) covering the exposed areas of the SAS with the objective of providing an adequate thermal environment to the SAS units.
The antenna assemblies, including their deployment and hold down mechanisms, are accommodated on the nadir panel of the MetOp-SG satellite B.
Figure 23: Illustration of the stowed SAS (image credit: Airbus DS)
MetOp-SG - Part 2
The mechanical structures of the SAS subassemblies (SAAs and MAA) are composed of aluminum brackets parts attached to supporting sandwich structures (each subassembly includes a sandwich panel). They are connected to a common U shaped support panel made of CFRP (Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer). Given the size of the SAS antenna and the tight mechanical requirements in terms of mechanical loads, stiffness, mass and frequency response, the design task of these units involves intensive simulation work in order to guarantee that the subassemblies (panels, mechanism) are submitted to mechanical loads compatible with their capabilities.
Figure 24: Illustration of the SAS antenna structure (image credit: Airbus DS)
Thermal performance: The thermal load cases analyzed for SAS are intended to define both the design limits which the equipment has to withstand in orbit, as well as to assess the thermal ranges of each of the units during operation, information which is used to compute the elements deformations due to thermoelastic effects and from this, to derive the impact on the RF behavior.
The following list is a summary of the dimensioning cases:
- Hot/Cold nominal
- Cold Safe – Deployed
- Hot/Cold Stowed (DLM Heaters ON/OFF)
- Launch cases.
Mechanical performance: Given the size and mass of the SAS structure, the dynamic behavior of the SAS is strongly dominated by the design of the interfaces with the satellite. For the Mid Assembly the first fundamental mode is a translation in the longitudinal direction, and for the Side Assemblies the modal response is driven by the stiffness of the structure, the mechanisms (DDM and HD RM) and its distribution along the mounting panel of the spacecraft. Overall, the SAS first fundamental mode in stowed configuration is a torsion along the longitudinal direction of the SAAs at 64 Hz.
In deployed configuration, the main SAS mode is driven by the stiffness of the DLM and the offset of the Side Assemblies masses. The minimum frequency in this case is 2.32 Hz.
Quasi Static Load analysis over 18 cases has been conducted and safety margins have been calculated for each element of the antenna in all static load cases. Sine vibration analysis has been also performed and primary notching levels have been considered to avoid exceeding quasi-static load levels at the SAS interface with the spacecraft. Primary notching takes into account the direct reaction forces in the same direction that the input level. Acoustic coupled analysis has been also performed to derive the mechanical loads to the SAS elements.
With respect to the impact of the structure on the SAS antenna performances, the main input to RF comes from the TED (Thermoelastic Distortion) analysis. TED is performed in deployed SAS configuration and covers the 4min sampled EOL and BOL thermal cases defined by the thermal analysis. In total 150 TED cases have been run.
SAS performance: The SAS performances are driven by the Gain stability requirements for the antenna system. SAS thermal control design and mechanical design are intended to guarantee that thermoelastic effects on the antenna assemblies populated with the radiating panels maintain the antenna gain variation within the 0.1dB requisite.
The RF stability analysis of SAS covers both the TED effects on the radiation patterns, which translates into pointing error and pattern deformation effects, and also on the impact of temperature variations on the RF elements that form the antenna [BFN (Beamforming Network) and radiating panels].
In order to determine these two combined effects, the RF subsystem inputs are the outcomes of the TED and the thermal analysis, presented before. The radiation pattern impact is computed by mapping the TED distortion maps on the array factor of the slotted antenna panels, and from them the pattern effects in terms of antenna gain and sidelobe effects are derived. This process is performed for the 150 EOL/BOL TED cases, for each of the 8 arrays included in SAS.
SAS development status:
Airbus Defence and Space (Spain) is in charge of the design of the SAS, as well as on the MAIT (Manufacturing Assembly Integration and Test) activities at antenna subsystem level, while the elements that compose the SAS have been submitted to an ITT process through the Best Practices protocol of ESA, which has been recently completed and is now being assigned to the last contractors.
The project development plan includes the design, manufacturing and test of three flight SAS models (PFM, FM2 and FM3) and one STM (Structural and Thermal Model). The STM is the qualification model of the complete thermomechanical subsystem and includes flight representative elements of all the components of the SAS.
In advance to the full SAS model built, each of the SAS subsystems (HDRM, DLM, radiating panels, BFN), has defined their lower tier qualification models and verification strategies in order to guarantee the development of flight model units fully qualified for the environmental boundary conditions defined.
The STM will be the first complete subsystem to be manufactured, integrated and tested for CDR (Critical Design Review). The large dimensions of the SAS involve large test facilities in Europe to perform the test campaign. The selected company in charge of the environmental test campaign is Intespace (Toulouse, France). The flight SAS model will also include the RF test campaign of the antennas.
RO (Radio Occultation sounding mission):
The main objective of the RO mission is to provide measurements of refractivity profiles in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere with a good vertical resolution and high accuracy. Refractivity profiles are then used for retrieving atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles as well information on surface pressure. High quality and global observations of atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles are of great importance for real time assimilation on NWP (Numerical Weather Prediction) and climate monitoring. 36)
A secondary objective of the RO mission is the retrieval of depth of the planetary boundary layer and the height (and structure) of the tropopause. Additionally, ionospheric TEC (Total Electron Content) and electron density profiles can be retrieved.
The RO instrument is equivalently called the GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) RO instrument, since it exploits the L-band radio-navigation GNSS signals to extract the required information on the Earth atmosphere.
The RO instrument is a passive instrument measuring the time variation of the excess path length of GNSS signals as they are occulted by the atmosphere. As depicted in Figure 25, the excess path length is the path length difference between the straight line path (between the GNSS satellite and the RO sensor, light blue line in Figure 25) and the actual refracted path (red line in Figure 25) travelled by the signal when passing through the atmosphere (the path is refracted/bended due to vertical refractivity gradients of the atmosphere). The excess path length depends on the refractive index of the atmosphere which is a function of pressure, temperature and humidity. On board the RO sensor, the excess path length is simply obtained by measuring the received GNSS signal carrier phase (equivalent to a signal Doppler shift).
Legend to Figure 25: Shown are the bending angle (α) , the GNSS and LEO side impact parameters (pG and pL), the GNSS and LEO coordinate vectors (RG , RL ), the ray path (solid red line), the SLTA (Straight Line Tangent Altitude), Altitude or Ray Path Tangent Height (in orange), and the satellite side asymptotes of the ray path (dashed).
The RO Level 1b product, starting point for the derivation of instrument requirements, is defined as the geolocated, time-tagged neutral bending angle as a function of impact parameter, available for each occultation.
Main RO instrument requirements are listed in the following:
- Number of occultations per SAT: > 1300/day
- Bending angle accuracy: < 0.5 µrad @ 35 km (1σ)
- Minimum SLTA (Straight Line Tangent Altitude): < -300 km
- Carrier and Code Open-Loop in Dual Frequency
- Open-Loop and Closed-Loop parallel processing
- Altitude range: 0-80 km for atmosphere, 80 km- 500 km for ionosphere
- Tracking of GNSS constellations: GPS, Galileo, and optionally GLONASS, BeiDou.
Table 12: GNSS CDMA open-access signals for RO mission
Instrument description: The RO instrument is mainly composed of 3 antennas (zenith, velocity and anti-velocity antennas), of a central electronics unit, and, if needed, depending on satellite configuration, by external LNA/filtering units for system noise figure minimization. The velocity and anti-velocity antennas are, respectively, looking in the velocity and anti-velocity satellite directions for tracking of rising and setting occultations. The central electronic unit is the core of the instrument. It performs signal filtering, down-conversion, signal processing, storage and instrument control tasks. The electronic unit is able to track new high-rate GPS, Galileo, GLONASS and Beidou signals as well as pilot signals. The signals are tracked by means of classical closed-loops, but also, in parallel, by carrier and code open-loops in order to deal with multipath conditions occurring in the lower troposphere. Tracking parameters such as sampling rate, integration time, loops bandwidth, are configurable anytime during the mission in order to guarantee maximum signal processing flexibility. The instrument operates both at L1 and L5 GNSS center frequencies in order to support the on-ground processing for correction of frequency-dependent ionospheric effects.
Predicted performance: The upcoming deployment of new GNSS constellations (i.e. Galileo, Beidou-Compass) and the improvement of associated signal characteristics make the MetOp-SG Radio Occultation sounding mission very attractive, considering the success of the current mission on board MetOp.
As an example, the coverage will improve up to three times thanks to the exploitation of Galileo and GLONASS (or Beidou/Compass) systems. With a single satellite it will be possible to achieve more than 1300 occultations per day. - In addition, the characteristics of novel signals such as the pilot signals, will guarantee higher quality observations on the lower troposphere regions. Novel design of open-loop acquisition schemes will also improve the quality and robustness of observations on the low troposphere. Other improvements come from the use of dual frequency channels with wide separation (i.e. L1 and L5), leading to better correction of the ionosphere.
Figure 26 shows the expected evolution of GNSS systems deployment, according to latest available public information.
All these features will be such that the radio occultation instrument will almost double the bending angle accuracy performance with respect first generation and will provide up to three times better Earth spatial-temporal sampling.
Table 13: Radio occultation instrument performance summary and comparison with GRAS
Figure 27: Illustration of the RO instrument elements (image credit: ESA)
3MI (Multi-viewing, Multi-channel, Multi-polarization Imaging mission):
The primary 3MI mission objective is to provide aerosol characterization for climate monitoring, NWP (Numerical Weather Prediction), atmospheric chemistry and air quality. High quality aerosol imagery ,delivered by the 3MI mission, will facilitate the measurement of all essential aerosol parameters for climate records, such as aerosol optical depths, particle types and sizes, refractive index, sphericity and height index. When used as constrains to the models, these products will be used to provide improved AQI (Air Quality Index) and Aerosol Load Masses for different particles sizes (Ref. 21). 37) 38)
The measurement of surface albedo as well as improved cloud characterization are 3MI mission's secondary objectives. The first will be facilitated via the observation of the surface BRDF (Bidirectional Reflectance and Distribution Function), made possible by the unique multi-angular measurement concept adopted. Similarly, while METimage will provide information on most cloud properties, the multi-viewing and multi-polarization measurements delivered by the 3MI mission will allow for accurate characterization of the extension, optical depth, particle size as well as asphericity factor and crystal orientation of cirrus clouds.
While currently, aerosol and cirrus parameters are mostly used in GCMs ( General Circulation Models) for climate simulation and prediction, utilization of these parameters is becoming increasingly important in operational NWP as the representation of radiative processes in the atmosphere is a recognized area of deficiency. Hence, the 3MI mission is expected to be of great benefit to both real-time and non-realtime user communities.
Background: Aerosol properties can only be unambiguously determined by instruments that can provide the so called 3M type of measurements, i.e. by instruments offering multi-viewing, multi-channel and multi-polarization capabilities. The only instrument designed specifically to do exactly that is the POLDER instrument. Developed by CNES, POLDER-1 and POLDER-2, respectively, launched in 1996 and 2002 on board the Japanese satellites ADEOS (Advanced Earth Observation Satellite) and ADEOS-2, were short-lived. POLDER-3 followed in 2004 on board the PARASOL satellite (A-train) and still delivers its measurements today (2012), having the highest aerosol retrieval capability of all other passive instruments currently in space. The APS (Aerosol Polarimetric Sensor), which was designed to provide even higher polarimetric accuracy and a larger number of viewing angles, unfortunately failed during launch of the Glory satellite in March 2011.
3MI is an evolution of the POLDER-3 / PARASOL instrument. It will therefore provide similar type of measurements (multi-angle, multi-wavelength and multi-polarization) nevertheless with an improved spatial resolution (4 km at nadir) and coverage, and over an extended spectral range (400 -2100 nm).
The 3MI measurement concept: In order to facilitate the ‘multi-viewing' type of measurements, 3MI adopts a similar to the POLDER instrument concept, upon which overlapping 2D images on the surface of Earth are recorded consecutively at regular points along the orbit [called along-track (ALT) acquisition points], thus providing the means to sense the TOA (Top of Atmosphere) radiance at different OZAs (Observation Zenith Angles) for each target.
Figure 28: The 3MI measurement concept – the example shows two images recorded in two along-track acquisition points (image credit: ESA)
The various spectral channels as well as the polarization state of the incoming to the instrument signal is then recorded by means of a rotating filter wheel, which accommodates all necessary filters and polarizers. All channels are acquired (in any given ALT acquisition) in less than 7 s during a single filter wheel rotation, while the distance between two consecutive ALT acquisitions is in the order of 22 seconds.
The 3MI instrument is providing a number of spectral channels spanning over an extended (compared to that of POLDER) spectral range, from 410 nm to 2130 nm. To achieve this, 3MI features two optical modules (VNIR and SWIR), each made of a dedicated telescope and focal plane assembly, both sharing a single filter wheel hosting all necessary spectral filters and polarizers. In the current instrument baseline, the two modules feature different ALT FOVs which has an impact both on the number of OZAs acquired per target and also on the OZA sampling range achieved for the two different groups of channels.
The VNIR module features a FOV of ±50.2º x ±50.2º (ACT x ALT, respectively), while the 3MI SWIR module features a FOV of ±50.2 º x ±30º (ACT x ALT, respectively). Due to this difference and given the timings mentioned earlier, this leads to approximately 14 and 6 OZAs views for each target within the swath of the instrument for the VNIR and SWIR groups, respectively. The angular sampling range will also vary accordingly between the two modules. It is possible, however, to increase the number of angular samples in the SWIR module by implementing the so-called angular ‘oversampling', whereby additional images are obtained, only for the SWIR channels, using one of the extra rotations of the filter wheel in-between the two nominal ALT acquisitions (during which the instrument would otherwise remain idle). These extra samples, however, cannot be co-registered with the VNIR ones.
One direct consequence of the adopted measurement concept is that, during any given pass of the satellite, a set of views is collected, which are nevertheless different for different targets on Earth. It is also obvious that, for any given target, the angular sampling step is also different as well as irregular. Figure demonstrates this, reporting the OZAs recorded for various targets on the sub-satellite track (from the VNIR module), between two sub-satellite points corresponding to two consecutive ALT acquisition points. The horizontal axis reports the normalized distance of a given target between those two points. It can also been seen from this figure that the angular sampling interval among the different angular samples collected for each target is not constant either (varies from about 5 deg to approximately 12 deg) and also different for different targets. Still, this irregular sampling is thought to facilitate improved accuracy of the aerosol specific retrieval algorithms.
Figure 29: OZA (Observation Zenith Angle) sampling for targets on the subsatellite track of 3MI (assumed ALT FOV = 50.2º), image credit: ESA
Figure 30 shows the footprint of the VNIR module of 3MI when the satellite crosses the equator in the day part of the orbit, indicating the range of OZAs accessible by the instrument for the different targets on Earth in a single image acquisition.
3MI key performances:
• 3MI swath: 3MI delivers a minimum swath of 2200 km, which is considerably larger of that of POLDER-3 on PARASOL. This is the result of its increased ACT (Across Track) FOV (± 50.2° for 3MI compares with ±42.6° for POLDER-3), as well as the higher orbiting altitude of MetOp-SG (approx. 820 km of MetOp-SG compares with approx. 705 km of the A-train /PARASOL orbit). Figure 31 shows the footprints of the two instruments for cross-comparison.
• Illumination geometry and scattering angle: The illumination geometry is of great interest too for the retrieval of the final 3MI products. Of particular importance is the so called Scattering Angle (SCA), defined as the π supplement of the angle formed by the direction of sun illumination and the satellite viewing direction (OZA) in the target reference frame. Figure 32 shows the accessible scattering angles by the nadir view of the instrument, (i.e. the one obtained using the central detector line), both for POLDER-3 and 3MI, indicating the differences which are the result of the two different orbits.
• Spatial sampling: The SSD (Spatial Sampling Distance) of 3MI in the along track and across track directions is a maximum of 4 km at nadir and varies slightly with the variation of altitude along the orbit. This compares with approximately 6 km of the POLDER-3 instrument. For off-nadir points, this figure increases slightly due to the curvature of the Earth and the mapping law of the instrument. For 3MI, the mapping law is an "f.tan(THETA)" law, which leads to a relative mild increase of the SSD across the swath. Figure 33, demonstrates the SSD variation for all samples within an 3MI image acquired above the equator. The color scale gives the average (mean ACT- and ALT-) SSD.
• 3MI spectral channels: The 3MI spectral bands are shown in Table 14. For comparison this table contains also the POLDER-3 spectral bands as well as the bands of 3MI at the beginning and the end of the Phase A studies. This last table is the current 3MI baseline. Red color is used to indicate the main differences. The extension of the spectral coverage of 3MI towards both sides of the spectrum is evident from this table.
• Polarization sensitivity: Assuming the measurement of a stable, spatially uniform and linearly polarized scene, the polarization sensitivity of the instrument is defined as PS = (Smax-Smin)/(Smax+Smin), where Smax and Smin are the maximum and minimum sample values, respectively obtained when the polarization is gradually rotated over 180º. Table15 shows the predicted values for this key instrument performance parameter for samples acquired with an OZA ≤ 60° and for samples acquired with an OZA> 60°. Figure 34 gives a typical example of the behavior of polarization sensitivity across the FOV of the instrument, for both a polarized and a non-polarized channel.
• Instrument radiometric resolution and calibration: As with POLDER, 3MI does not feature an on-board calibration system. Its absolute radiometric calibration cannot be subsequently guaranteed at instrument level, but will be subject to the accuracy of the vicarious calibration campaigns to be performed during the lifetime of the instrument. As a result, the output product of 3MI at instrument level (conventionally noted as Level 1b1), will be subject to absolute radiometric scaling and correction during the actual operations. Regarding radiometric resolution, a SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio) of 200 is specified for a range of TOA (Top-of-Atmosphere) radiances between Lref and Lmax, where the ratio of Lmax/Lref is approximately 11 for all specified spectral bands.
3MI instrument design:
The 3MI instrument concept which was adopted following the feasibility phase (Phase A) is a very similar one to the one proposed at the end of the previous Phase 0 studies, and, as already mentioned, draws largely on the design heritage of the POLDER instrument. Figure 35 depicts this concept.
Currently, two modules are foreseen for 3MI. The two modules are similar in form and function and are meant to cover, respectively, the two different specified spectral domains of the instrument (VNIR & SWIR). The channel (910 nm) of 3MI is to be included in both modules. Each module features a wide FOV dioptric telescope (minimum ± 57° diagonal). The optical design is telecentric and deploys several optical elements, some of which include aspheric surfaces. High performance / low polarization anti-reflection (AR) coatings are deployed on all surfaces to meet the stringent straylight and polarization sensitivity requirements of the instrument.
The measurement of the different spectral channels and polarizations is performed sequentially in time and facilitated by a rotating filter wheel performing one full revolution in less than 7 s each time and which is placed between the optical heads and the focal plane assemblies. The wheel features two concentric rings each accommodating the filter slots for the VNIR and SWIR modules respectively. One filter wheel serves both modules.
Two-dimensional large format detectors are used on all modules. Charged Coupled Devices (CCDs) and photovoltaic HgCdTe detectors hybridized on top of a CMOS ROIC (Read-Out Integrated Circuit) are proposed for the VNIR and SWIR modules respectively. In order to reduce the dark current, the SWIR FPA is cooled down to 180 K-190 K via means of passive cooling (radiator), and its temperature stabilized using controlled heater circuits.
Figure 36: 3MI instrument Optomechanical Unit (-X side), image credit: ESA
METimage (Meteorological Imager)
METimage, formerly known as VII (Visible and Infrared Imager), is an advanced multispectral medium-resolution imaging radiometer for meteorological applications to be integrated onto the MetOp-SG satellite series, formerly known as EPS-SG (EUMETSAT Polar System –Second Generation), which is planned to be operational in 2021.
Germany intents to provide the first flight unit of METimage as in-kind contribution to the MetOp-SG program of EUMETSAT. DLR (German Aerospace Center) awarded a study contract to Jena-Optronik in December 2008. Initial concept studies for METimage infrared detectors were already conducted in the timeframe 2007-2009 by AIM Infrarotmodule GmbH, Heilbronn. In November 2012, DLR awarded to Jena-Optronik a Phase-B2 design contract for METimage, funded by two German federal government ministries, BMWi (Bundeswirtschaftsministerium - Ministry of Economics and Technology) and BMVBS (Bundesverkehrsministerium - Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs). 39) 40) 41)
METimage is regarded a successor of the AVHRR-3 (Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer) of NOAA flown on the current EPS/MetOp satellite series, and is the European counterpart of the VIIRS instrument on the USA new-generation weather satellite series (NPP and JPSS). 42) 43) 44)
The primary objectives for METimage of the MetOp-SG mission are to provide high quality imagery data for global and regional NWP (Numerical Weather Prediction), NWC (Now-Casting), and climate monitoring. To meet these objectives, METimage has to provide high resolution cloud products, aerosol products, sea- and ice surface temperature and others. Other mission objectives are to support the Post-EPS sounders by providing geolocation and cloud characterization, and to provide data continuity of other key imagers in support of long-term climate records. From these objectives the requirements for the METimage mission have been derived, among them:
- Global coverage within 12 hours
- Large number of spectral bands and wide spectral range
- Demanding figures for dynamic range and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
- Polarization insensitivity of 5% for the reflective solar bands (443 nm to 3 µm) and 11% for the thermal emission bands (3 - 13.35 µm)
- Spatial resolution of 500 m and 250 m for selected channels
- Coregistration of all spectral bands: spatial > 87%, temporal < 1 second.
The main drivers for the METimage instrument design result directly from the mission requirements. To meet 12-hour global coverage from an orbit of 830 km altitude, a large swath of 2670 km, corresponding to a cross-track scan angle of ± 55° about nadir, must be observed by the instrument. To cover the large FOV (Field of View), METimage is based on a mechanical scanner telescope (i.e., whiskbroom type), using reflective optics to cover the wide spectral range required to implement the 20 channels on two focal planes. 45)
Figure 37: Schematic view of the METimage instrument (image credit: DLR)
The products to be derived from the METimage mission are:
- Cloud observations including microphysical analysis
- Water-vapor imagery
- Aerosol observations
- Polar AMVs (Atmospheric Motion Vectors)
- Earth surface albedo
- Cryosphere (snow observations, sea and land ice imagery)
- Fire observations
- Surface temperature (land and sea).
Table 16: METimage baseline channels (Ref. 43)
Optics: The rotating telescope scanner design consists of a three-mirror anastigmat, rotating at constant speed about an axis parallel to the line-of-sight, followed by a HAM (Half-Angle-Mirror), a plane mirror rotating at half of the telescope speed. Such a system provides a de-rotated image in the focal plane. Calibration sources are mounted at scan angles outside the ±55° Earth view (Figures 38 and 39). Compared to a two-mirror telescope, the three-mirror anastigmat design provides a high image quality over a larger FOV, allowing implementation of more detectors on the focal plane. With the in-field separation of spectral bands (see below), a large instantaneous FOV is essential for the number of spectral bands that can be implemented. In addition, the large FOV allows increasing the number of detectors per spectral band, leading to a larger footprint on ground. This allows a reduced rotation speed of the telescope and thus increases the integration time per pixel, resulting in improved radiometric performance.
Legend to Figure 38: On-axis view of the rotating telescope. Downward facing is the large ±55° Earth view (nadir at center); the calibration sources are mounted at scan angles outside the Earth view. The telescope is rotating at constant speed, the calibration sources are sampled during each rotation.
Legend to Figure 39: Along axis view of the rotating telescope. At the left side of the telescope is the half-angle-mirror, rotating at half the telescope speed, producing a de-rotated image in the focal plane.
Following the main optics is a compact, passively cooled secondary optics, providing both an aperture and a field stop, to minimize the impact of stray light and radiative input to the thermal channels. A beam splitter directs the visible and infrared parts of the incoming radiation to one of the two respective FPAs (Focal Plane Assemblies). The IR focal plane is actively cooled to cryogenic temperatures. Each focal plane accommodates detectors and filters for 10 or 11 spectral bands.
A common problem for most scanning systems is different incident angles on optical surfaces, which result in scan-angle dependent polarization properties. In practice, the polarization dependence will also result in a wavelength dependent change of mirror reflectivity. This effect directly adds to the radiometric error budget for all channels, especially when the calibration sources are at different scan angles than the earth view. For the thermal emissive bands there is an additional error contribution resulting from the angle dependent thermal emission of the HAM. It is therefore important for the optics not only to keep the polarization within the values specified in the polarization requirement, but also to keep the difference between different scan angles as small as possible to maintain radiometric accuracy and homogeneity.
FPA design: The spectral separation of individual spectral bands is done by in-field separation, where detectors for different spectral bands are located side-by-side in the focal plane. Due to the cross-track scanning, the image moves sequentially over all spectral bands on a focal plane (Figure 40). For each spectral band there is a row of detectors in along-track direction, so as for a whiskbroom scanner, the instrument records a number of image lines simultaneously during each scan.
Filters are mounted directly in front of the detectors and provide the required spectral shape and resolution. The number of spectral bands that can be accommodated on a focal plane is limited by the usable FOV and the mechanical size of a detector row and filter assembly. The usable FOV is not only limited by the image quality of the optics, but also by the co-registration budget: co-registration errors increase with the distance of detectors within a focal plane (image quality, rotation rate errors, alignment errors, thermal effects, satellite ground speed, and others). With the current design, about 10 or 11 channels can be implemented on each focal plane. The exact number depends on the radiometric requirements and performance of the selected channel combination: some spectral bands will need TDI (Time-Delayed Integration) to achieve the required SNR, thus using up more space on the focal plane.
Detectors: Detectors are another crucial element in the imaging radiometer. The quality of the detection chain, consisting of detector plus read-out electronics, is decisive for the radiometric accuracy. To achieve the radiometric requirements, METimage will use detectors made from different semiconductor materials. As the spectral sensitivity is dependent on the material, it has to be matched to the target wavelength range. This is especially true in the infrared region. The long wavelength IR channels are the design driver of focal plane temperature and cooling needs. State of the art ROIC (Read-Out Integrated Circuits) with integration stages and amplifiers will be mounted directly on the focal plane arrays.
Calibration: The calibration for the thermal emissive bands is based on a two-point calibration, measuring "zero" by using a cold space view and a high temperature by looking at a high precision blackbody. The blackbody is operated close to instrument temperature, reducing errors due to non-perfect blackness and ageing effects of the black coating. Both calibration targets are scanned during every revolution of the telescope and calibrate all detectors on the cold focal plane. The blackbody can be heated to verify the linearity of the thermal emissive bands detection chains on a regular basis. Blackbody and the primary cold space view are located at opposite positions of the telescope (Figure 38) and are seen under the same scan angle in order to minimize scan-angle dependent effects. A second cold space view can be implemented at a different scan angle to monitor the scan-angle effects and temperature variations of the HAM.
The reflective solar bands are calibrated using the blackbody as optical zero and a solar diffuser as bright source. While the blackbody provides a suitable zero measurement during every revolution of the telescope, the solar diffuser is illuminated only for short time during each orbit (about once every 100 minutes) by the sun, so that a full calibration of the solar channels is only done once per orbit. A common problem with solar diffusers is their ageing under exposure to UV radiation. Even though the planned diffuser for METimage is exposed only for short times and shows relative little ageing under UV exposure, the overall degradation during eight years mission lifetime accumulates to much more than the required 1% lifetime stability. A diffuser monitor device that is well protected from UV radiation is used to calibrate the main diffuser on a regular basis so that the degradation of the main diffuser can be monitored and corrected.
Mechanical instrument design: The instrument consists of an optical head and detached electronics box. Figure 41 shows the optical head. The mechanical configuration is strongly influenced by the different FOV requirements for operational measurements, of the calibration sources and radiators for thermal conditioning. The need for high thermal stability is reflected in a structure that is well shielded. It is as far as possible closed to external radiation intake, which also benefits the stray-light suppression.
Legend to Figure 41: The front of the picture shows the large operational view (110° earth-view). The right side points toward deep space and shows the radiators and the deep space view for calibration. The baffle for the solar diffuser is visible on the left side of the instrument.
While the necessity for a well adapted optical design is easy to perceive, the intricacies of the mechanical design may not be so obvious. However, the accuracy and stability of the mechanical structure supporting the rotating telescope and the half angle mirror is crucial for core performances related to line-of-sight stability. The requirements for relative stability of subassemblies can be as low as a few arcsec. Figure 42 shows the schematic block diagram of METimage.
Figure 42: Block diagram of METimage, containing the basic building blocks, i.e. the scanner, which produces the optical image, the secondary optics, and the focal planes (image credit: DLR, Jena-Optronik)
Table 17: Overview of some METimage system parameters (Ref. 44)
IASI-NG (Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer – Next Generation)
• To assure the continuity of IASI for NWP, atmospheric chemistry and climate applications.
• To improve the characterization of the lower part of the troposphere, the UT/LS region and, more generally, of the full atmospheric column.
• To improve the precision of the retrievals and to allow the detection of new species.
The IASI-NG instrument requirements call for:
- 16921 spectral channels between 645 and 2760 cm-1 (15.5 - 3.63 µm)
- with a spectral resolution of 0.25 cm-1 after apodization (0.50 cm-1 for IASI)
- a reduction of the radiometric noise by at least a factor of 2 as compared to IASI on MetOp (factor of 2 on the spectral resolution, sampling and the radiometric noise).
• Phase-A studies at CNES since January 2010, end in April 2012.
• Two industrial studies have been conducted in parallel (Airbus DS-France and Thales Alenia Space-France).
Figure 43: The IASI-NG mission and its predecessor instruments (image credit: CNES) 49)
The Table 1 gives the main instrument requirements. These new needs exhibit a spectral resolution and a signal-to-noise ratio improved by a factor two compared with IASI. First idea to fulfill the requirements is, compared to IASI, to increase the interferometer OPD (Optical Path Difference) range (to obtain the desired spectral resolution and spectral sampling) and to increase the pupil size and/or the time observing the signal to cope with the radiometric noise.
Table 18: IASI-NG main requirements
Increasing pupil size is rapidly difficult due to mass and volume needs for the instrument. Increasing the time of observation is possible by increasing the instantaneous FOV (Field of View) of the instrument because we also want to have the same on ground spatial sampling as IASI. - However, it is well known that increasing the OPD range and increasing the FOV in a classical Michelson interferometer lead to increase the so-called self-apodization function of the instrument which will lead unavoidably in reducing the spectral resolution. Classical Michelson interferometer requires a compromise between FOV, spectral resolution and signal to noise ratio.
The only way to succeed in fulfilling the requirement is to compensate the self-apodization function due to the FOV. The IASI-NG instrument is based on a classical Michelson interferometer with a Mertz compensator, where a variable plate thickness is introduced in a pupil plane allowing to compensate for each OPD value the optical path difference between the on axis and the off axis rays which is a condition to master the field self-apodization function. This technique allows having a widened field interferometer. One of the originality of the instrument is in the implementation of the OPD and compensation mechanisms with a unique actuator (single motorization).
Instrument description: The overall layout on the instrument is illustrated in Figure 44. The instrument is composed of various subsystems, the following presents a summary of the instrument functions and operations. The beam coming from the observed point on Earth enters the instrument via a reflection on a pointing mirror. A two-axis scan mechanism provides the desired target direction and compensates for satellite velocity during the interferogram acquisition. The required swath (around 2000 km) is covered during a regular cycle which is repeated along the orbit.
In addition to the nominal Earth target acquisition, the scan mechanism allows five dedicated pointing directions to the three instrument calibrations systems:
- One internal blackbody and two deep space views for radiometric calibration
- A Fabry-Perot filter for spectral calibration. The spectral calibration is periodically performed by looking at the cold space through this filter which provides a reference spectrum comb which is used to check the calibration law of the instrument
- An interferometer wavefront calibration, named WFS (Wave Front monitoring System). It uses a source beam, provided by a laser source, sent from the edge of the field mask located in the entrance telescope towards the pointing mirror.
This latter is used in auto-collimation mode to send back the WFS beam into the instrument. The processing of the data acquired with the science detectors of one spectral band allows measuring the interferometer wavefront. These wavefront data are taken into account for ground processing. This operation is foreseen to be performed during commissioning phase and a few times during the mission to check the long-term stability of the interferometer.
A typical observation sequence consists in pointing the scan mirror successively towards the 14 Earth views to cover the required swath (Figure 45). It is then switched towards two successive radiometric calibration positions, one aiming at a reference Blackbody and one aiming at the cold space. This cycle is then repeated automatically and the instrument performs continuous data acquisition throughout the mission lifetime.
The 90 mm diameter beam then enters the ATA (Afocal Telescope Assembly) which reimages the entrance pupil inside the interferometer, providing a beam diameter reduction ratio of 2.25; the pupil size is reduced to 40 mm at the interferometer level. The resulting field increase is acceptable thanks to the Mertz compensation which allows wide field angles without compromising spectral resolution.
The optical path difference resulting of the interferometer mechanism motion is monitored by the Laser Metrology. A frequency stabilized laser source sends several beams into the interferometer: these beams undergo interferences in the interferometer in the same way as the science beams and specific detectors receive the resulting metrology interference signals. The Laser Reception Electronics acquires and processes these data. A computed OPD is used to synchronize the science detectors acquisitions so that interferogram data are acquired at constant OPD intervals. The laser signals are also used to derive the tilt of the differential wavefront which is used for on ground correction of the instrument spectral response function.
The outgoing beam of the interferometer is then focussed by the Imaging Telescope Assembly onto a field stop located at the cryostat input port: this stop consists in a pattern of four by four holes that define the sounder pixels size and relative positions. The cryostat includes the focal plane cold optics and the detectors. The focal plane optics transmits the signal to arrays of 4 x 4 detectors in a pupil imaging mode. These optics also include three spectral beam splitters in order to separate the beam into the four IASI-NG spectral bands. Table 19 provides the band separation. Compared to IASI a fourth band is needed to fulfil the radiometric noise requirement between 2200 cm-1 and 2760 cm-1.
The cryostat allows cooling down of the detectors at the operating temperature of 75 K thanks to a pair of redundant active cryocoolers. The signals from the detectors are then read and formatted thanks to an analog FEE (Front End Electronics) before been digitized in the MVU (Main Video Unit) and sent to the ICPU (Instrument Control and Processing Unit).
On board data processing is part of the IPCU. Most of the processing is performed on ground for better flexibility and optimal accuracy. The on-board processing is mostly a "compression" processing to cope with the allocated data rate between the instrument and the platform (6 Mbit/s, the raw instrument data rate being ~120 Mbit/s). So, the on-board processing includes correction of the non-linearities and determination of the ZPD (Zero Path Difference) position on the interferograms prior to the FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) giving real and imaginary terms of the radiance spectrum. After a lossless compression, the spectra are downlinked together with the metrology tilt data. The sequence of on-ground processing performs the self-apodization correction using the metrology tilt data, spectral calibration using the Fabry-Perot views and radiometric calibration using the blackbody and cold space interferograms. The ICPU contains also the control electronics of the instrument. It provides the power distribution function, the TM/TC interfaces and the interface with the satellite SpaceWire bus. It also performs the instrument FDIR (Failure Detection, Isolation and Recovery) management, the thermal control and the sequencing of the activities.
The IASI-NG instrument needs also to geolocate the sounding points. This is done thanks to the use of the geo-localization of METimage instrument images (multiband imager present on METOP-SG ) and co-registration with IASI-NG sounding pixels. The coregistration is ensured by a dedicated integrated infrared imager (IMA) inside the IASI-NG instrument. This imager uses an uncooled microbolometer in the 10.5-12.5 µm band.
Interferometer description: The interferometer is a Michelson interferometer modified to introduce a compensation of field self-apodization. The principle of the compensation technique is to introduce in one arm of the interferometer a thick plate to limit the evolution of the OPD (Optical Path Difference) range in the field (which is the aspect to be suppressed). 50)
It is easy to show that there is a relation between the OPD, the mirror displacement D, the plate thickness (e) and the optical index (n) of the plate.
On axis this relation is: OPD = 2 [D + e(n-1)] → Equation (1)
The paraxial condition of the compensation is fulfilled when D, e, n vary simultaneously like: D = e (n-1)/n → Equation (2)
For a classical Michelson at OPD=0, the interferometer has no field effect and it is so equivalent for the Mertz to D=0, and so to e=0. The technical challenge is to be able to continuously adapt the plate thickness (e) with the displacement mirror variation (D), that is to say somewhere to synchronize two mechanisms: one for the displacement mirror and another one to adapt the plate thickness to the considered displacement. In the proposed concept the compensation is performed simultaneously with the displacement mirror scan thanks to a dedicated interferometer mechanism principle called the DSM (Dual Swing Mechanism).
This interferometer principle is based on an alternate translation of two pairs of optical prisms in opposite directions (dual swing motion). Each arm contains an IP (Internal Prism) and an EP (External Prism). IP and EP are mounted head to toe and by the way, the set IP+EP could be considered as a parallel face blade. A reflective coating will be deposited on the outside face of the EP, so the outside face of EP could be considered as a plane mirror for the interferometer.
The OPD is obtained by moving EP (the mirror on the outside face) in one side in an arm and in the other side in the other arm (this also reduces the need of stroke for the mechanism). The movement is in the plane of the hypotenuse of EP. To cope with the compensation condition, the IP movement must be such that the images of each outside mirrors are always at the same position at the exit of the interferometer.
OPD is obtained by moving EP (the mirror on the outside face) in one side in an arm and in the other side in the other arm (this also reduces the need of stroke for the mechanism). The movement is in the plane of the hypotenuse of EP. To cope with the compensation condition (Eq. 2) the IP movement must be such that the images of each outside mirrors are always at the same position at the exit of the interferometer.
Figure 46: Michelson Interferometer principle (a) classical (b) with Mertz compensator (image credit: CNES, Airbus DS SAS)
Hence, to do that, in the arm where the EP goes backward (distance increase between EP mirror and beam splitter), the plate thickness has to increase and in the arm where the EP goes forward (distance decrease between EP mirror and beam splitter) the plate thickness has to decrease (Figure 47).
To implement the mechanical displacement, two IPs are mounted on the same supporting frame head to toe (first swing) and the two EPs are mounted on another frame (second swing) head to toe (and of course each IP is mounted head to toe wrt its EP). The adequate movement of translation between the prisms is provided by deformable parallelogram principle. Composed of four articulated levers, the parallelogram provides by its deformation a differential translation between two of its levers, the frames supporting the optical parts as represented on Fig. 6. The resulting frame motions translate the prisms transversely to the optical beam, generating the variation of both mirror and plate thickness. The ratio of thickness variations being obtained by the ratio of the actuation radius of the two frames, and so the accuracy of the compensation, that is to say the synchronization of the mirror displacement and the plate thickness variation, is obtained purely by mechanical considerations. The circular motion of the lateral panels also generates a pure translation (transverse motion) of the prisms which has no effect on the optical performance because the variation is identical on both interferometer arms.
Hence, the design employs a plane mirrors interferometer, where the DSM has to ensure a dual swing motion of the prisms with minimum parasitic tilts together with a sufficient high kinematic stability along the stroke.
Acquisition chain: In parallel with the development of the optical chain, the development of the detection chain has also to be conducted to master the overall instrument development plan. The IASI-NG detection chain may seem comparable to IASI's one, but it is quite different in its operating point and implementation.
General organization: The detection chain is composed of DP (Detector Packages), analog FEE (Front End Electronics) and the MVU (Main Video Unit). The science domain has been divided into 4 bands and there will be 4 x 4 detectors in each band. In order to minimize the mission unavailability in case of a failure, the detection chain architecture is organized to lost non- adjacent pixels and no more than 25% of the useful pixels in case of failure of an equipment in the chain. That is to say, that the chain is divided into 4 groups of 2 x 2 pixels in each band, each group being independent of the others and composed of non-adjacent pixels as illustrated in Figure 48.
B1 chain: The B1 band will be made with an array of 4 x 4 PC MCT (Photoconductive Mercury Cadmium Telluride) detectors. To improve the responsivity each monolith detector will be "multi-striped" (Figure 49) to increase impedance and thereby reduce the need for very low noise floor of the downstream electronics. Use of this kind of detectors is made possible thanks to the pupil imaging. Use of PC detectors for band B1 also allows getting the right detectivity with reasonable cooling. Several mock-up have already been fabricated and tested and show preliminary performances in line with the needs.
Instrument budgets: The IASI-NG instrument will be composed of two modules:
• An Optical Head (called I-OH) that mainly includes optomechanical parts of IASI-NG instrument, for the sounder and the imager
• An Electronics Module (called I-EM) that includes most of the electronics, except for the FEE, kept close to cryostat, the Imager Video Electronics located in the vicinity of the imager optics and the LASE (Laser Source Electronics), which is located inside the I-OH to avoid having optical fibers between the two modules.
The volume of the two modules is given in Figure 50. The mass allocation for the overall instrument is 360 kg and the power budget is about 500 W.
Table 20: Instrument main characteristics
1) Peter Schlüssel, “Post-EPS user and mission requirements for future sounders,” EUMETSAT, Oct. 25, 2010, URL:
3) “EUMETSAT - Monitoring weather and climate from space,” ESCON (European Space Components Conference) 2011, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, March 15-17, 2011, URL: https://escies.org/download/webDocumentFile?id=49181
4) “EUMETSAT Council approves EPS-SG Preparatory Programme and extends Indian Ocean service,” EUMETSAT Press Release, Nov. 16, 2012, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/Home/Main/News/Press_Releases/825429?l=en
5) “Taking Weather forecasting into the future,” ESA, May 20, 2014, URL:
6) Rob Oremus, ”MetOp-SG – Polish Industry Day,” Warsaw, Poland, May 7, 2015, URL:
7) “MetOp Second Generation instruments,” ESA, March 9, 2011, http://www.esa.int/esaLP/SEM95PXTVKG_LPmetop_0.html
Peter Schlüssel, “EUMETSAT Polar System – Second
Generation,” ITSC-18 (International TOVS Study Conferences),
Toulouse, France, March 21-27, 2012, URL: http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/itwg/itsc
9) “Europe secures new generation of weather satellites,” ESA, October 16, 2014, URL:
10) ”EUMETSAT and NOAA sign Polar System Program Implementation Plan,” EUMETSAT, Dec. 21, 2016, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/website/home/News/DAT_3319255.html
11) Rob Oremus, “MetOp-SG: consortia, planned tender actions and possibilities for Polish entities,” Earth Observation Industry Day, Warsaw, Poland, 07 May 2015, URL: http://www.nauka.gov.pl/g2/oryginal/2015_05/a6ebbace78f15a6275e32df6897bdd67.pdf
12) M. Betto, H. Barré, G. Mason, D. Pawlak, P. Damilano, M. Pendaries, U. Schull, R. Fayard, ”MetOp Second Generation - System Overview,” EUMETSAT 2016 Meteorological Satellite Conference, Darmstadt, Germany, Sept. 26-30, 2016, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/website/home/News/ConferencesandEvents/DAT_2833302.html
“Airbus Defence and Space signs MetOp-SG meteorological
satellites prime contract with ESA,” Airbus DS, Oct. 17, 2014,
14) ”Monitoring Weather and Climate from Space,” EPS-SG Overview for CSPP / IMAPP User’s Group Meeting, April 15, 2015, URL: http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/meetings/cspp/2015/Agenda%20PDF/Wednesday/Schluessel_EPS-SG_CSPP_IMAPP.pdf
15) Veronica Magan,”CPI to Support New Generation Of Meteorological Satellites,” Satellite Today, Nov. 18, 2016, URL:
16) ”METimage – Next-generation weather forecasts,” DLR, Sept. 20, 2016, URL: http://DLR's/DLR/en/descriptively/tabid-10081/151_read-19352/year-all/#/gallery/24393
17) ”METimage: New Weather Data Every 1.7 seconds,” Airbus DS, Press Release, Sept. 20, 2016, URL:
18) ”EUMETSAT and CNES sign agreement for IASI-NG instrument,” EUMETSAT, Dec. 8, 205, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/website/home/News/DAT_2869085.html
19) ”EUMETSAT and ESA sign cooperation agreement on MetOp-SG satellite,” EUMETSAT, Oct. 5, 2015, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/website/home/News/DAT_2804093.html
20) Chung-Chi Lin, Ville Kangas, Salvatore D’Addio, Ilias Manolis, “MetOp-SG studies: Instruments,” 3rd Post-EPS User Consultation Workshop , 29-30 September 2011, Darmstadt, Germany, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/groups/pps/documents/document/pdf_peps_ucw3_06.pdf
Ilias Manolis, Jean-Loup Bézy, Maurizio Betto, Hubert
Barré, Graeme Mason, “Metop Second Generation 3MI
mission,” Proceedings of the 2012 EUMETSAT Meteorological
Satellite Conference, Sopot, Poland, Sept. 3-7, 2012, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/Home/Main/AboutEUMETSAT
Marc Loiselet, Ville Kangas, Ilias Manolis, Franco Fois, Salvatore
d’Addio, “MetOp Second Generation Payload,” ESA
23) Bertrand Thomas, Hugh Gibson, Achim Walber, Michael Brandt, Martin Philipp, Jan Ceru, Oleg Cojocari, Byron Alderman, Harald Czekala, Thomas Rose, “Submillimeter Wave Transmitter/Receiver Devices and Test Equipment For the ICI Instrument Onboard MetOp-SG,” Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Advanced RF Sensors and Remote Sensing Instruments (ARSI), Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Sept. 13-15, 2011, URL: http://www.congrex.nl/11c11/ARSI%20papers/THOMAS_ARSI_Paper.pdf
24) N. Cavan, M.E. Humphries, S.D. Lewis, “Preliminary Development of a Long-Life Contactless Power and Data Transfer Module for Next Generation Radiometry Devices,” Proceedings of the 14th European Space Mechanisms & Tribology Symposium – ESMATS 2011, Constance, Germany, Sept. 28–30 2011 (ESA SP-698)
25) Susanne Crewell, Stefan Bühler, Catherine Prigent, “Potential of the Ice Cloud Imaging Instrument within the EUMETSAT Polar System –Second Generation,” URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/groups/pps/documents/document/pdf_peps_ucw3_19.pdf
26) Raquel González Sola, Marc Bergadà Pujades, Massimo Labriola, Miguel Ángel Palacios Lázaro, “The Ice Cloud Imager for Metop-SG: the development challenge has started,” Proceedings of the Advanced RF Sensors and Remote Sensing Instruments &Ka-band Earth Observation Radar Missions, (ARSI'14 & KEO'14), ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Nov. 4-7, 2014
27) S. A. Buehler, C. Jimenez, K. F. Evans, P. Eriksson, B. Rydberg, A. J. Heymsfield, C. J. Stubenrauch, U. Lohmann, C. Emde, V. O. John, T. R. Sreerekha, C. P. Davis, ”A concept for a satellite mission to measure cloud ice water path, ice particle size, and cloud altitude,” Querterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 133, 2007, pp: 109-128, DOI: 10.1002/qj.143, URL: http://www.sat.ltu.se/members/sab/publications/ciwsir_concept/buehler07_ciwsir_qjrms.pdf
29) Giulia Pica, G. Alberti, A. Memoli, M. R. Santovito, S. Varchetta, B. Buralli, S. D’Addio, V. Kangas, “MetOp Second Generation: a joint ESA/EUMETSAT mission for weather forecast and climate monitoring with an imaging radiometer,” Proceedings of the 63rd IAC (International Astronautical Congress), Naples, Italy, Oct. 1-5, 2012, paper: IAC-12-B1.3.10
30) Andrea Sacchetti, Tito Lupi, Christian Tabart, Carine Bredin, Franck Bayle, Enrico Vetrano, Nikolas Sidiropoulos, Salvatore D’Addio, “Microwave Imager Instrument for MetOp Second Generation,” Proceedings of the Advanced RF Sensors and Remote Sensing Instruments &Ka-band Earth Observation Radar Missions, (ARSI'14 & KEO'14), ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Nov. 4-7, 2014
31) “OHB AG: CGS signs contract for the realization of the MWI,” OHB Press Release, Nov. 10, 2014, URL: http://www.dgap.de/dgap/News/corporate
32) George Tennant, Graham Sykes, Mike Buckley, Mike Hutchinson, “Microwave Sounder for MetOp-SG,” Proceedings of the Advanced RF Sensors and Remote Sensing Instruments &Ka-band Earth Observation Radar Missions, (ARSI'14 & KEO'14), ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Nov. 4-7, 2014
Ville Kangas , Salvatore D'Addio , Maurizio Betto, Hubert Barre , Marc
Loiselet, Graeme Mason, “Metop Second Generation microwave
sounding and microwave imaging missions,” Proceedings of the 2012
EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference, Sopot, Poland, Sept. 3-7,
Franco Fois , Chung-Chi Lin, Hubert Barré, Maurizio Betto, Marc
Loiselet Graeme Mason, “MetOp Second Generation Scatterometer
Mission,” Proceedings of the 2012 EUMETSAT Meteorological
Satellite Conference, Sopot, Poland, Sept. 3-7, 2012, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/Home/Main/AboutEUMETSAT/Publications/ConferenceandWorkshopProceedings
35) Q. Garcia, J. Martinez, M. J. Martin, M. Gutierrez, A. Bernal, A. Trastoy, F. Cespedosa, J. Cardenal, J. Lopez-Mateos, L. Martinez, C. Palacios, C. Limiñana, A. Østergaard, S. Appel, F. Rostan, U. Rauscher, ”MetOp-SG SCA antenna subsystem design,” Proceedings of the TTC 2016 Workshop, ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 13-16 Sept. 2016
Salvatore D'Addio, Ville Kangas, Maurizio Betto, Hubert Barre , Marc
Loiselet, Graeme Mason, “Metop Second Generation: Radio
Occultation Sounding Mission,” Proceedings of the 2012 EUMETSAT
Meteorological Satellite Conference, Sopot, Poland, Sept. 3-7, 2012,
37) Ilias Manolis, Jérôme Caron, Semen Grabarnik, Jean-Loup Bézy, Maurizio Betto, Hubert Barré, Graeme Mason, Roland Meynart, “The MetOp Second Generation 3MI mission,” Proceedings of the ICSO (International Conference on Space Optics), Ajaccio, Corse, France, Oct. 9-12, 2012, paper: ICSO-027, URL: http://congrex.nl/icso/2012/papers/FP_ICSO-027.pdf
38) Ilias Manolis, Semen Grabarnik, Jérôme Caron, Jean-Loup Bézy, Marc Loiselet, Maurizio Betto, Hubert Barré, Graeme Mason, Roland Meynart, “ The MetOp second generation 3MI instrument,” Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 8889, 'Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XVII,' 88890J, Desden,Germany, October 16, 2013, doi:10.1117/12.2028662
39) “DLR und Jena-Optronik unterzeichnen METimage-Vertrag,” DLR, Nov. 15, 2012, URL: http://www.dlr.de/dlr/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-10081/151_read-5667//year-all/
40) “METimage: Machbarkeitsuntersuchung zu IR-Detektoren,” URL: http://www.dlr.de/rd/Portaldata/28/Resources/dokumente/re/Datenblatt_IR-Detektoren.pdf
41) Matthias Alpers, Christian Brüns, Isabel Zerfowski, “Status of METimageDesign and DevelopmentAn Innovative Imaging Radiometer for the Post-EPS VII Mission,” Post-EPS User Consultation Workshop, Darmstadt, February 3-4, 2009, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/groups/pps/documents/document/pdf_peps_ucw2_15.pdf
F. Schmülling, I. Zerfowski, A. Pillukat, R. Bonsignori,
“"METimage : a multispectral imaging radiometer for the EUMETSAT
Polar System follow-on satellite mission", Proceedings of SPIE, Vol.
7826, 'Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XIV,' 78260P,
Toulouse, France, October 13-20, 2010, doi:10.1117/12.869272; URL: http://www.dlr.de/rd/Portaldata/28/Resources
43) Isabel Zerfowski, Frank Schmülling, Christian Brüns, “Status of METimage studies,” 3rd Post-EPS User Workshop, Darmstadt, Germany, September 29-30, 2011, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/groups/pps/documents/document/pdf_peps_ucw3_10.pdf
45) ”The METimage concept,” DLR, URL:
46) Vincent Guidard, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/groups/pps/documents/document/pdf_peps_ucw3_13.pdf
47) Cyril Crevoisier, Cathy Clerbaux, Vincent Guidard, Thierry Phulpin, Raymond Armante, Brice Barret, Claude Camy-Peyret, Jean-Pierre Chaboureau, Gaelle Dufour, Juliette Hadji-Lazaro, Hervé Herbin, Nicole Jacquinet, Lydie Lavanant, Sébastien Payan, Eric Péquignot, Clémence Piérangelo, Didier Renaut, Claudia Stubenrauch, “IASI-New Generation onboard EPS-SG: Expected impact on accuracy and vertical resolution for atmospheric variables,” ITSC-18 (International TOVS Study Conferences), Toulouse, France, March 21-27, 2012, URL:http://ara.abct.lmd.polytechnique.fr/oral_pub/2012/2012_itsc18_iasing_crevoisier.pdf
49) Cyril Crevoisier, Cathy Clerbaux, Vincent Guidard, Thierry Phulpin, Raymond Armante, Brice Barret, Claude Camy-Peyret, Jean-Pierre Chaboureau, Gaelle Dufour, Juliette Hadji-Lazaro, Hervé Herbin, Nicole Jacquinet, Lydie Lavanant, Sébastien Payan, Eric Péquignot, Clémence Piérangelo, Claudia Stubenrauch, “The IASI-NG mission: Scientific objectives and expected results,” 3rd IASI Conference Hyères, France, 4-8 February 2013, URL: http://ara.abct.lmd.polytechnique.fr/oral_pub/2013/2013_iasi_conf_crevoisier.pdf
Luitot, Joël Boyadjian, Christian Buil, Frederick
Pasternak,”Optical architecture of the new generation infrared
atmospheric sounder interferometer (IASI-NG),” Proceedings of
SPIE, Vol. 8841, 'Current Developments in Lens Design and Optical
Engineering XIV,' San Diego, August 2013, doi: 10.1117/12.2025236
The information compiled and edited in this article was provided by Herbert J. Kramer from his documentation of: ”Observation of the Earth and Its Environment: Survey of Missions and Sensors” (Springer Verlag) as well as many other sources after the publication of the 4th edition in 2002. - Comments and corrections to this article are always welcome for further updates (email@example.com).