Minimize GCOM

GCOM (Global Change Observation Mission-Water)

GCOM-W1    Launch   Mission Status    Sensor Complement   GCOM-C1   Ground Segment
References

GCOM is a JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) observation program consisting of a constellation of two medium-sized spacecraft with the provisional names of GCOM-W and GCOM-C. GCOM is seen as a follow-up program to ADEOS.-II (launch Dec. 14, 2002) with the overall objective to contribute to global change research through long-term (> 10 years) sustained observations with corresponding data sets. Three consecutive constellations of spacecraft are being planned, representing in particular the long-term Japanese contribution to the GEOSS (Global Earth Observation System of Systems) initiative. The prime goal of GEOSS is to achieve comprehensive, coordinated and sustained observations of the Earth environment. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13)

The mission of GCOM is to achieve the following objectives:

• The primary goal of GCOM-W, a sea surface observation mission, is to contribute to observations related to global water and energy circulation. The payload consists of an AMSR2 (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2) instrument.
Note: The AMSR instrument was flown on ADEOS-II mission (Dec. 14, 2002 to Oct. 25, 2003 - a power failure accident ended ADEOS-II) of JAXA, and the AMSR-E (for EOS) instrument is being flown on the Aqua mission of NASA (launch May 2002).

• The primary goal of the GCOM-C mission is to contribute to surface and atmospheric measurements related to the climate change with emphasis on the carbon cycle and the radiation budget. The payload consists of a second-generation GLI (SGLI) instrument.

The GCOM series will be maintained toward the final mission goal which should be accomplished by the end of 13 year observations, processing and analysis and application research period. The GCOM program calls for the following goals:

• The establishment of long-term observation system for the global carbon cycle and radiation budget, integrated with other earth observation systems.

• Contribution to numerical climate models (driving force, outputs comparison, and parameter tuning).

• Contribution to operational use (weather forecast, monitoring of meteorological disaster, fishery..).

• Enhancement of new satellite data usability.

GCOM is expected to make the following achievements by the end of its mission (around 2027):14) 15)

1) Global warming

• Understanding of the global warming by global and long-term measurement data on various parameters.

• Separation between natural variability and trends using the data set covering the 27 year period from the launch of the ADEOS or the 21 year period from the launch of the ADEOS-II.

2) Change of land environment

• Understanding of global forest dynamics

• Understanding of snow and ice changes

3) Clarification of sink and source of greenhouse gases.

Expected achievements of GCOM

Atmosphere

Radiation: PAR (Photosynthetically Active Radiation) in the visible range

Clouds: Cloud amount, cloud type, cloud top height, optical thickness of cloud, cloud water equivalent

Aerosols: Optical thickness of aerosol, size distribution of aerosol

Ocean

Ocean biology: Chlorophyll-a, extinction coefficients, suspended solids (SS), colored dissolved organic matter (C-DOM)

Ocean physics: Sea surface winds vector, sea surface temperature (SST)

Land

Vegetation distribution: APAR (Absorbed photosynthetic active radiation), LAI (Leaf area index), Biomass, land cover, land surface reflectance, land surface temperature and emissivity, surface soil moisture over non vegetated area

Cryosphere

Sea ice concentration, snow cover, discrimination of wet and dry snow over non vegetated area, dry snow water equivalence over non vegetated area, ice cover

Possible contribution to understanding of global changes

Global warming

Understanding of the reality of the phenomenon: global and long-term measurement data on various parameters which significantly affect global warming, except for some parameters (evapotranspiration, etc.) related to the water cycle, can be retrieved.

Separation between natural fluctuations and trends: using the data set covering the 27 year period from the launch of the ADEOS or the 21 year period from the launch of the ADEOS II covering one sun spot cycle and two or three ENSO cycles, it will be possible to separate the natural fluctuation components of the climate and trends

Understanding of the sinks/sources of GHGs (Green House Gas)

Change of land environment

a) Understanding of global forest dynamism
b) Understanding of snow and ice changes

Table 1: Overview of GCOM series investigation themes 16)

Item / Spacecraft series

GCOM-W1 (Water)

GCOM-C1 (Climate)

Instrument

AMSR2 (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2)

SGLI (Second-generation Global Imager)

Orbit type

Sun synchronous sub-recurrent orbit

Altitude

699.6 km (on equator)

798 km (on equator)

Inclination

98.2º

98.6º

LTDN

13:30 hours ±15 min

10:30 hours ±15 min

Launch site

TNSC (Tanegashima Space Center), Japan

Launch vehicle

H-IIA

Launch year

May 17, 2012

2016

Spacecraft launch mass

1991 kg

2093 kg

Spacecraft design life

5 years

5 years

Spacecraft power generation

> 3880 W @ EOL

> 4000 W @ EOL

Spacecraft size (deployed)

5.1 m x 17.5 m x 3.4 m

4.6 m x 16.3 m x 2.8 m

Table 2: Overview of some GCOM spacecraft parameters

GCOM_Auto25

Figure 1: Planned launch sequence of the two GCOM mission series of GCOM-W and GCOM-C (image credit: JAXA) 17)

GCOM_Auto24

Figure 2: Geophysical parameters in four categories (atmosphere, land, ocean and cryosphere) to be observed by GCOM (image credit: JAXA)

Legend to Figure 2: GCOM-W (blue border) and GCOM-C (green border). SST (Sea Surface Temperature) is observed by both GCOM-W and GCOM-C; hence, its border is a dotted line of blue and green.

 


 

GCOM-W1 (Global Change Observation Mission-Water 1) Mission / Shizuku :

The GCOM-W1 mission of JAXA is dedicated to sea surface monitoring and to contribute to observations related to global water and energy circulation. In September 2011, the GCOM-W1 mission received the nickname Shizuku - meaning a "drop" or a "dew" in Japanese.

GCOM_Auto23

Figure 3: Artist's view of the GCOM-W1 spacecraft (image credit: JAXA)

 

Spacecraft:

JAXA has decided to use medium-scale satellites for GCOM series observations. The GCOM-W1 spacecraft is 3-axis stabilized. The attitude of GCOM-W1 is controlled by 4 reaction wheels in response to the signal from IRU (Inertial Reference Unit) calibrated by Star Trackers and GPS receivers.

The EPS (Electrical Power Subsystem) has 2 redundant systems including batteries and solar paddles, and therefore the satellite can survive even if one solar paddle has a failure. Power of 4.05 kW is provided at EOL (End of Life).

The spacecraft on-orbit dimensions are (deployed configuration): 5.1 m (X) x 17.5 m (Y) x 3.4 m (Z). The spacecraft has a mass of about 1991 kg at launch (dry bus mass of 1324 kg, propellant mass of 151 kg, AMSR2 mass of 405 kg). The design life is 5 years. 18)

The PDR (Preliminary Design Review) of GCOM-W1 took place in March 2008. The spacecraft CDR (Critical Design Review) was completed in December 2009.

GCOM-W1 was integrated in 2010 and has already passed the most of the proto-flight test items in the spring of 2011. The AMSR2 proto-flight model provided desirable characteristics in the ground testing. 19) 20)

GCOM_Auto22

Figure 4: Photo of the GCOM-W1 spacecraft (image credit: JAXA)

RF communications: The S-band is used for TT&C data transmission: TT&C data rates at 29.4 kbit/s (USB), 1 Mbit/s (QPSK,) and 1.6 kbit/s in SSA (S-band Single Access). Command data rates: 4 kbit/s (USB), 125 kbit/s (SSA). The payload data downlink in X-band (8105 MHz) with a data rate of 20 Mbit/s without convolution coding and with the QPSK scheme. Direct real-time downlink of payload data to receiving stations with agreement.

Real-time observation data over Japan are transmitted by X-band to JAXA's ground stations at Katsuura, or EOC (Earth Observation Center at Hatoyama, Saitama). The received data are distributed immediately after Level-1 data processing.

 

Launch: The GCOM-W1 spacecraft (nickname: Shizuku - meaning a "drop" or a "dew") was launched on May 17, 2012 [UTC, the local time in Japan was 1:39 hours on May 18, JST (Japan Standard Time)] on an H-IIA F21 vehicle from TNSC (Tanegashima Space Center), Japan. Launch provider: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. 21) 22)

GCOM_Auto21

Figure 5: Schematic view of the payloads in the H-IIA launch vehicle (image credit: JAXA) 23)

Secondary payloads on this flight were: 24)

• KOMPSAT-3 (Arirang-3) of KARI, Korea with a mass of ~1000 kg. Note: A contract between the launch service provider MHI (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.) and KARI was signed in January 2009. This represents the first satellite launch services order placed to MHI by an overseas customer. 25)

• SDS-4 (Small Demonstration Satellite-4) of JAXA with a mass of ~ 50 kg

• HORUYU-2 of KIT (Kyushu Institute of Technology) with a mass of 7.1 kg.

Orbit: Sun-synchronous orbit, altitude = 699.6 km, inclination = 98.2º, LTAN (Local Time on Ascending Node) at 13:30 hours (to continue the AMRS-E observations). Since the orbit is very similar to the one of the A-Train, it will join the A-Train constellation of NASA. The position of GCOM-W1 in the constellation is a few minutes prior to the Aqua spacecraft (Ref. 1). 26) 27)

GCOM_Auto20

Figure 6: The GCOM-W1 (Shizuku) satellite in the A-train constellation (image credit: NASA, JAXA) 28)

GCOM_Auto1F

Figure 7: Alternate view of the GCOM-W1 spacecraft in orbit (image credit: JAXA, Ref. 10) 29)

 


 

Mission status of GCOM-W1/Shizuku:

• October 18, 2017: Every year, the process is generally the same: the cap of sea ice on the Arctic Ocean melts and retreats through spring and summer to an annual minimum extent. Then, as the ocean and air cool with autumn, ice cover grows again and the cycle continues. But when we take a look at smaller regions within the Arctic, we get a more detailed picture of what's been going on. 30)

- The map of Figure 8 shows the extent of Arctic sea ice on September 13, 2017, when the ice reached its minimum extent for the year. Extent is defined as the total area in which the ice concentration is at least 15 percent. The map was compiled from observations by the AMSR-2 (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 instrument on the GCOM -W1 (Global Change Observation Mission 1st-Water)/Shizuku satellite mission operated by JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency). The yellow outline in Figure 8 shows the median sea ice extent observed in September from 1981 through 2010.

GCOM_Auto1E

Figure 8: Arctic sea ice extent acquired on Sept. 13, 2017 by the GCOM-W1 spacecraft of JAXA (image credit: NSIDC)

- According to the NSIDC (National Snow and Ice Data Center) in Boulder, CO, the Arctic sea ice cover in 2017 shrank to 4.64 million km2, the eighth-lowest extent in the 39-year satellite record. Charting these annual minimums and maximums has revealed a steep decline in overall Arctic sea ice in the satellite era. But the decline is not the same everywhere across the Arctic Ocean. The Beaufort Sea north of Alaska, for example, is the region where sea ice has been retreating the fastest.

GCOM_Auto1D

Figure 9: Regional ice extent in arctic seas, acquired in the period June 20-October 10, 2017 and analyzed by NSIDC (image credit: NASA Earth Observatory, images by Joshua Stevens, using data from the National Snow and Ice Data Center, story by Kathryn Hansen)

- This year, ice in the Chukchi and Beaufort and seas reached their minimum extents toward the end of September, later than the Arctic as a whole. The graph of Figure 9 shows the ice in these two seas was still declining while other regions had started freezing. The melting persisted the longest in the Beaufort Sea, which finally started to refreeze after reaching a minimum on September 27. Data for the graph come from the NSIDC MASIE (Multi-sensor Analyzed Sea Ice Extent) product, which is based on operational sea ice analyses produced by the U.S. National Ice Center. Note: the MASIE observations included also the SSM/I instrument on the DMSP series. In addition, in situ measurements were used.

- Ice loss is the Beaufort and Chukchi seas was not record-breaking this year, but the extents were much lower than usual. Notice in the map how the ice edge in these seas was farther north than average. According to Walt Meier, a scientist at the NSIDC (National Snow and Ice Data Center), the Chukchi and Beaufort seas entered the melt season with a lot of first-year ice. This ice type is generally thinner than multi-year or perennial ice (which survived the previous melt season); first-year ice tends to melt away more easily.

- Meier also notes that low-pressure weather systems persisted near the North Pole for much of the summer. "Low pressure will keep things cooler overall and generally will lead to a relatively higher ice extent overall," Meier said. "However, the position of the low this year led to winds blowing from the south and west that help move ice out of these regions. Also, the winds may have helped to bring in warmer ocean waters from the Bering Strait region as well."

• July 26, 2017: An iceberg about the size of Mie Prefecture of Japan split off from Antarctica's Larsen C iceberg on July 12, 2017. The AMSR-2 (Advance Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2) on JAXA's Shizuku satellite captured the calving of the close to 5,800 km2 chunk of ice. The nascent iceberg created by the rift is estimated to weigh over a trillion tons. 31)

- AMSR-2 was instrumental in grasping this major calving event. It can turn to and observe the same area a few times a day regardless of time and weather. Antarctica is currently in its winter, the season of six-month-long darkness. AMSR-2's high temporal resolution could monitor the progression of the rift despite the absence of light, which the traditional optical sensors cannot.

GCOM_Auto1C

Figure 10: AMSR-2 observation sequence of the Larsen-C iceberg in the period July 6 to 20, 2017 (image credit: JAXA)

• February 21, 2017: Global sea ice extent hit record low, according to observations from Shizuku on GCOM (Global Change Observation Mission) on January 14, 2017. It is an all time low in the history of satellite operation that started in 1978, JAXA continues operation of Shizuku and GCOM-C and monitoring arctic sea ice extent, off the coast of Greenland Sea and the rest of the arctic circle. 32)

GCOM_Auto1B

Figure 11: Sea ice extent of Antarctica observed by Shizuku on January 14, 2017 (image credit: JAXA)

• The GCOM-W1/Shizuku mission is operational in 2016. 33)

GCOM_Auto1A

Figure 12: Sample AMSR2 weekly image in the timeframe Feb. 5-11, 2016 (image credit: JAXA/EORC)

• November 2, 2015: JAXA/EORC (Earth Observation Research Center) has developed GSMaP (Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation) realtime version (GSMaP_NOW) providing rainfall information of current hour, and released those information through a new webpage "JAXA Realtime Rainfall Watch". While GSMaP near-real-time version (GSMaP_NRT) is provided with a 4 hour data latency, which consists of 3 hour for data gathering and 1 hour for processing, GSMaP_NOW is provided in quasi-realtime and updated every half hour. For example, hourly GSMaP_NOW image and data during 09:30Z and 10:29Z is available at around 10:30Z through the web site. 34) 35)

- GSMaP_NOW produces rainfall map over the area of geostationary satellite "Himawari", using passive microwave observations that are available within half-hour after observation (GMI, AMSR2 near Japan, and AMSU direct receiving data). Furthermore, half-hour extrapolation of rainfall map toward future direction by using cloud moving vector from the geostationary satellite allows us to estimate "current" rainfall map at every half-hour.

GCOM_Auto19

Figure 13: Example image of the web site "JAXA Realtime Rainfall Watch" (image credit: JAXA/EORC)

• September 5, 2014: NOAA has begun to routinely utilize observational data acquired by the AMSR2 (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2) aboard GCOM-W1/Shizuku to monitor the land, ocean and atmosphere globally and around the U.S. 36)

- NOAA is studying the possibility of utilizing data acquired by the AMSR2 instrument aboard the Shizuku as well as by the DPR (Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar) on the GPM (Global Precipitation Measurement) satellite. Both the AMSR2 and DPR instruments were developed by JAXA, and JAXA and NOAA have been discussing cooperation on the projects. As a first step, AMSR2 data are regularly provided to the U.S. for weather forecast applications. NOAA's recently signed MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) with NASA on the NASA-JAXA GPM mission will allow NOAA to receive the DPR data. As part of NOAA's participation with NASA on the GPM Science Team, a few NOAA investigators are testing the feasibility of utilizing the spaceborne radar information from DPR and its predecessor, the PR (Precipitation Radar) flown on the NASA-JAXA TRMM (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission) satellite, in regional forecast models to improve the forecasting of tropical systems.

- NOAA's National Hurricane Center is now routinely utilizing AMSR2 data, which have contributed to improvements in the center location and structure analysis for a number of hurricanes as shown in Figure 14. The cloud image captured through infrared observation (right) cannot clarify the internal structure of a typhoon or hurricane, but the microwave observation (left) clearly shows the dual structure of the eye and surrounding rain bands of Hurricane Arthur off the U.S. East coast through its observation of horizontally polarized brightness temperature (89 GHz-H) being naturally emitted from the Earth's surface and the atmosphere.

GCOM_Auto18

Figure 14: Images of Hurricane "Arthur" on July 3, 2014acquired by microwave observation of AMSR2 on GCOM-W1(left) and by infrared observation (right), image credit: NOAA and NRL

• July 2014: GCOM-W1 data is being captured at the KSAT Svalbard ground station and assembled into APID packets. Using the JPSS (NPP) infrastructure, the GCOM raw data APID packets are routed to the NOAA IDPS (Interface Data Processing System) in near-realtime. Once received at the IDPS, the APID packets are reformatted into RDRs (Raw Data Records) and sent to the NDE (NPP Data Exploitation) system for distribution to the Environmental Satellite Data Processing System where further processing to brightness temperatures (Level 1)/SDRs (Sensor Data Records) and geophysical products (Level 2)/EDRs (Environmental Data Records) are performed. The RDRs are processed to SDRs utilizing software provided by JAXA. The EDRs are generated utilizing NOAA's AMSR2 product processing system. - The goal of the product processing system is to provide validated operational L2 products from the AMSR2 instrument that address the GCOM-W1 requirements in the JPSS L1RD supplemental for distribution to operational users. 37)

• July 2014: AMSR2 standard products are distributed through the GCOM-W1 Data Providing Service . Level 1 data has been distributed to public since January 25, 2013, and Level 2 and 3 products since May 18, 2013. The GCOM-W1 Data Providing Service System also distributes AMSR and AMSR-E standard products. Also, registered users can obtain near-realtime data by applying special user form. 38)

• In Feb. 2014, the U.S. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) announced that it will utilize observation data acquired by the AMSR2 instrument aboard GCOM-W1, starting in June 2014, to monitor the birth and development of a tropical low pressure system. JAXA and NOAA signed the MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) on GCOM data application in 2011. 39)

• The GCOM-W1 spacecraft and its payload are operating nominally in 2014. 40)

• On Dec. 18, 2013, the JAXA/EORC Tropical Cyclone Database of AMSR2 was released. 41)

• October 17, 2013: The GCOM Project Team of JAXA captured the 2013 Nikkei Global Environmental Technology Awards Prize for Excellence for its development of the Global Change Observation Mission 1st – Water "SHIZUKU" (GCOM-W1). 42)

GCOM_Auto17

Figure 15: This image shows the extent of Arctic sea ice on September 12, 2013, the day before NSIDC estimated sea ice extent hit its annual minimum (image credit: NASA) 43)

Legend to Figure 15: The white line shows the 30-year (1981-2010) average minimum extent. The data were provided by JAXA from their Global Change Observation Mission-Water (GCOM-W1) satellite's Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2 (AMSR2) instrument.

• In late September 2013, the ice surrounding Antarctica reached its annual winter maximum and set a new record. Sea ice extended over 19.47 million km2 of the Southern Ocean. The previous record of 19.44 million km2 was set in September 2012. 44) 45)

GCOM_Auto16

Figure 16: Antarctica's sea ice on Sept. 22, 2013 observed by the AMSR2 instrument on JAXA's GCOM-W1 spacecraft (image credit: NASA, JAXA)

Legend to Figure 16: Antarctica's sea ice is creeping further out in the ocean! New data from the GCOM-W1 satellite shows that sea ice surrounding the southern continent in late September reached out over 19.47 million km2. The extent — a slight increase over 2012's record of 19.44 million km2 — is the largest recorded instance of Antarctica sea ice since satellite records began, NASA said. While researchers continue to study the forces driving the growth in sea ice extent, it is well understood that multiple factors—including the geography of Antarctica, the region's winds, as well as air and ocean temperatures—all affect the ice.

The GCOM-W1/Shizuku spacecraft and its payload are operational in mid-2013. Full operational service (level 2 and level 3 geophysical data products) are available since May 17, 2013. 46)

JAXA has started offering eight kinds of products whose physical quantity concerning water on the Earth, including precipitable water and sea surface temperature, is calculated based on the observation data acquired by the AMSR2 (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2) aboard the Shizuku (GCOM-W1) after its initial calibration operation was completed. 47)

These products will contribute to capture environmental changes on a global scale such as worrisome decreasing ocean ice areas in the North Pole as well as the El Nino and La Nina Phenomena. The products can also be utilized for various fields including weather and precipitation forecasts for storms and downpours by global meteorological agencies such as the JMA ( Japan Meteorological Agency) and the U.S. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).

• In January 2013, JAXA has started offering brightness temperature products from AMSR-2 after its initial calibration operation was completed and the brightness temperature products (level 1B and level 3) with good quality and stability have been available to users at the GCOM-W1 Data Providing Service since late January, 2013. 48)

• Nov. 2012: The AMSR2 SST (Sea Surface Temperature) product is validated by comparing with various buoy SST observations reported through the GTS (Global Telecommunication System) operated by WMO (World Meteorological Organization). Each match-up data will include AMSR2 footprints around buoy stations within radius of 30 km and 2 hours. Root mean square error (RMSE) between AMSR2 and Buoy SSTs from August to December 2012 is currently 0.56 °C and correlation coefficient (R) is 0.998 (Figure 17). 49)

GCOM_Auto15

Figure 17: Early validation results of AMSR2 SST. Upper: AMSR2 SST in descending orbit on Nov. 10, 2012. Lower: Comparison of AMSR2 and buoy observations (image credit: JAXA)

• October 2012: JAXA and JAMSTEC (Japan Agency for Maritime-Earth Science and Technology ) are collaborating in the Earth environment field by combining space and oceanic technologies such as merging data acquired by an Earth observation satellite and on-the-spot data obtained through an observation system deployed in the ocean. 50)

The project started to provide data on the Arctic Ocean area acquired by the Shizuku spacecraft to the NiPR (National Institute of Polar Research) for its voyage to observe and investigate the area using JAMSTEC's Oceanographic Research Vessel "MIRAI". The provided data is expected to contribute to NiPR's research and safe navigation. - The project is sending MIRAI data, including sea ice distribution, ocean temperature distribution and sea ice concentrations observed by Shizuku, which can conduct observations regardless of weather conditions, three times a day. Shizuku's data is being used to find the best sailing routes and for selecting observation areas.

The data on the Arctic Ocean area acquired this time by MIRAI, including the ocean surface temperature, will also be provided to JAXA in order to verify the accuracy of Shizuku's data as well as to study environment changes such as analyzing recently decreasing Arctic sea ice (Ref. 50).

• On August 10, 2012, JAXA completed the initial functional verification of GCOM-W1 and has moved to the regular observation operation as scheduled. The project will first perform the initial calibration and checkout during which the acquired data will be compared with observation data on the ground to confirming the data accuracy. 51)

- AMSR-2 standard products will be distributed to public for research and educational purposes though web site (https://gcom-w1.jaxa.jp/) after calibration/validation phase. The current data distribution schedule (Sept. 2012) is to distribute Level 1 products (brightness temperature) to the public in January 2013, and Level 2 (geophysical parameters) in May 2013. 52) 53)

GCOM_Auto14

Figure 18: Rainfall image of the Typhoon No.11 (Haikui) approaching the east coast of China, observed by Shizuku on August 7, 2012 (image credit: JAXA) 54)

GCOM_Auto13

Figure 19: Image of AMSR2 Level-1B products showing brightness temperature at vertical and horizontal polarization of each frequency bands of one scene on July 22, 2012 (image credit: JAXA, Ref. 53)

• July 4, 2012: JAXA released some observation images of Earth acquired by GCOM-W1 (Shizuku). 55)

GCOM_Auto12

Figure 20: Global color composite image observed by AMSR2 (image credit: JAXA)

Legend to Figure 20: The one-day image was observed on July 3, 2012 using the brightness temperature (in vertical and horizontal polarization) of the 89.0 GHz channel and the vertical polarization of the 23.8 GHz channel. In this image, whitish-yellow color parts indicate areas with heavy rain or sea ice, light blue color areas are with little water vapor in the atmosphere or thin clouds, the dark blue color sections are areas with more water vapor in the atmosphere or thicker clouds, and the black color parts are areas that were not observed.

• On June 28, 2012 (UTC), the GCOM-W1 spacecraft was inserted into a planned position on the international A-Train orbit. GCOM-W1 (Shizuku) is flying in front of the Aqua satellite. The satellite will remain in this position until the OCO-2 spacecraft of NASA/JPL joins the constellation sometime in 2014. - JAXA will increase the rotation speed of the AMSR2 aboard the Shizuku from the lower rotation mode (11 rpm) to the regular observation mode of 40 rpm to verify its observation performance. 56)

GCOM_Auto11

Figure 21: Artist's view of the A-Train spacecraft (image credit: NASA)

• JAXA confirmed that the solar array paddle deployment was successfully performed for the Global Change Observation Mission 1st - Water "SHIZUKU" (GCOM-W1) somewhere over Australia via image data. 57)

• After the separation of KOMPSAT-3 spacecraft at 16 minutes into the flight, the GCOM-W1 spacecraft separated from the launch vehicle 23 minutes after launch (Ref. 23).

 


 

Sensor complement: (AMSR2, a single instrument is flown)

AMSR2 (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2):

AMSR2 is a follow-on JAXA radiometer of AMSR and AMSR-E heritage (passive instruments) installed on the ADEOS-II (JAXA) and the Aqua (NASA) missions, respectively. The objective is to achieve measurement of: sea surface temperature (SST), soil water content (moisture), sea wind speed, water equivalent of snow cover, precipitation intensity, sea ice distribution, precipitable water, etc. The observables are the microwave emissions from the atmosphere, ocean, sea ice, and land which are being measured at multiple frequencies. 58) 59) 60) 61) 62) 63)

The following improvements of the AMSR2 instrument were implemented based on experience gained in the AMSR-E mission:

1) Deployable main reflector system with 2.0 m diameter

2) Frequency channel set is identical to that of AMSR-E, except for the additional 7.3 GHz channel for radio frequency interference mitigation

3) Two-point external calibration with the improved HTS. In addition, deep-space maneuver will be considered to check the consistency between the main reflector and CSM (Cold Sky Mirror).

The instrument employs a parabolic offset antenna (antenna aperture of 2 m diameter) providing a conical scan with a swath width of ~ 1450 km (from a 700 km orbit). The incidence angle is 55º nominally. AMSR2 is a total power microwave radiometer with a two point external calibration method:

1) Deep space using a cold sky mirror

2) An on-board hot load.

For the absolute calibration, deep space observations will be done using the main mirror. AMSR2 is able to provide global observations in just 2 days.

The AMRS2 frequency channels are identical to those of AMRS-E except the 7.3 GHz channel which is being used for RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) mitigation in the 6.925 GHz channel. Intensive efforts were made to improve the performance of the HTS (High-Temperature noise Source, a hot load), which has been the greatest challenge in the AMSR-E calibration. A redundant momentum wheel was added to increase the reliability of the instrument.

Center frequency (GHz)

Beam width [Ground resolution (km)]

Bandwidth (MHz)

Sampling interval (km)

Polarization

NEΔT (K)

Data quantization (bit)

6.925

1.8º [35 x 62]

350

10

V & H

0.34

12

7.3

1.8º [34 x 58]

350

0.43

12

10.65

1.2º [24 x 42]

100

< 0.70

12

18.7

0.65º [14 x 22]

200

< 0.70

12

23.8

0.75º [15 x 26]

400

< 0.60

12

36.5

0.35º [7 x 12]

1000

< 0.70

12

89.0 A/B

0.15º [3 x 5]

3000

5

< 1.20/1.40

12

Table 3: Frequency channels and resolution of the AMSR2 instrument

GCOM_Auto10

Figure 22: Channel Specifications of AMSR2 64)

Scan concept

Conical scan at a rotation speed of 40 rpm (1.5 s per scan)

Swath width

> 1450 km

Antenna

2.0 m aperture, offset parabola with a deployable main reflector

Data quantization

12 bit

Incidence angle

55º nominal

Polarization

Vertical (V) and horizontal (H)

Cross polarization

< -20 dB, (< -16 dB for 7.3 GHz)

Dynamic range

2.7 K to 340 K

Sampling interval

2.6 ms (corresponding to 10 km), 1.3 ms for 89 GHz channel

Instrument mass

405 kg

Table 4: Overview of AMSR2 parameters

GCOM_AutoF

Figure 23: Three views of the AMSR2 instrument (image credit: JAXA)

 

GCOM_AutoE

Figure 24: Overview and components of the AMSR2 instrument (image credit: JAXA)

GCOM_AutoD

Figure 25: Conical scanning configuration of AMSR2 on GCOM-W1 with a swath width of 1450 km (image credit: JAXA)

GCOM_AutoC

Figure 26: Artist's view of GCOM-W1with the AMRS2 instrument (image credit: JAXA)

 

AMSR2 calibration:

AMSR2 has two calibration targets, named HTS (High Temperature noise Source) and CSM (Cold Sky Mirror). The configuration of these targets are shown in Figure 27.

CSM is a 0.6 m diameter offset parabolic reflector, whose manufacturing process is the same as that of the main reflector to ensure consistency between the two reflectors. The antenna patterns of CSM were measured as is the case with main reflector to be verified the performance requirement. In addition to the antenna pattern, VSWR (Voltage Standing Wave Ratio) of the combination of CSM and each feed-horn was measured (Ref. 19).

GCOM_AutoB

Figure 27: Configuration of calibration assembly; TCP and Sun Shade are installed on HTS/AMSR2 only (image credit: JAXA)

HTS is a microwave absorber shrouded in a thermally-controlled box and panel. HTS/AMSR2 thermal design: The accuracy and the reliability of AMSR2 has been improved compared with the designs of AMSR and AMSR-E. There were major problems in HTS thermal design of AMSR and AMSR-E,and they caused large temperature gradient on the absorber surface of HTS. For the thermal design of HTS/AMSR2, the following two major items were requested to improve: (Ref. 59)

1) Uniformity of the absorber surface (2.5ºCp-p)

2) Thermal measurement accuracy (0.4ºC (3σ)).

Uniformity of the absorber surface of HTS/AMSR2.

To improve the temperature uniformity, thermal design of HTS/AMSR2 has been improved. The thermal design of HTS/AMSR, AMSR-E, shown in Figure , has the following features:

- Controlling the absorber temperature using heater rods inside the absorber corns

- The surface at the facing side of the absorber covered with MLI whose temperature was not controlled.

- The thermal connection between the absorber surface and outside(space, sun etc.) was large because there were big chinks between HTS and the MLI of the facing side. This design caused the large temperature gradient on the absorber surface.

The improved thermal designed was analyzed using on-orbit thermal analysis and two thermal vacuum tests. As a result of the on-orbit thermal analysis with the AMSR2 model, which adopted these improvements, the temperature uniformity of the absorber is satisfying the request.

GCOM_AutoA

Figure 28: Heater control of HTS/AMSR-E (image credit: JAXA)

To improve the temperature uniformity of its surface, The thermal design around HTS/AMSR2 had been improved in the following items (shown in Figure 29):

- Changing thermal control methodology; covering all aspects of the absorbers with panels whose temperatures are uniformly controlled. (instead of the Heater rod in the AMSR-E/HTS)

- Installing the TCP (Thermal Control Panel) to control the temperature of the facing side of absorber surface

- Installing "Sun Shade" to minimize the sunlight heat input which comes into HTS through the chinks between HTS and TCP.

GCOM_Auto9

Figure 29: Heater control of HTS/AMSR2 (image credit: JAXA)

Characterization and Calibration of Early Orbit Data:

By the extensive effort in improving HTS in terms of thermal control mechanism, in-orbit performance of HTS was significantly improved. Therefore, the project applies the simple two-point calibration method for deriving AMSR2 Tbs in the current processing system, with corrections such as for detector non-linearity and antenna beam characteristics (e.g., spillover factor and cross-polarization ratio), based on the pre-launch laboratory measurements and analyses. Also, the measured antenna patterns were used in deriving coefficients to produce Level-1R product. Although the satellite system was designed to enable deep space calibration maneuver during the initial checkout phase, it was cancelled because of the potential risk of strong RFI which could damage the AMSR2 receivers (Ref. 66).

Intercalibration with other microwave radiometers:

Currently (2013), the project is testing several intercalibration methods for version 1.1 AMSR2 Tbs. The first one is to intercalibrate multiple polar orbiting microwave radiometers by utilizing the TRMM (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission) TMI (Microwave Imager) as a transfer radiometer. Since TMI can cover various observing local time by TRMM's precession orbit, one obtains simultaneous observations by TMI and each polar orbiting radiometer and then indirectly compare among polar orbiting radiometers via TMI.

The same concept has been studied and tested by GPM X-CAL team. Because of different sensor characteristics such as in the observing center frequency and Earth incidence angle, these differences must be compensated before comparison. To do this, RTMs (Radiative Transfer Models) are being used and global analysis data produced by meteorological agencies. The project is currently using RTTOV 10.2 distributed by the Satellite Application Facility for Numerical Weather Prediction as RTM 6). In simulating Tbs, we are usingsurface emissivity model/atlas built-in RTTOV10.2: FASTEM 5 for ocean and TELSEM for land surface emissivity. We are using ERA-Interim analysis produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and the Global Daily Sea Surface Temperatures produced by the Japan Meteorological Agency. The analysis procedure is as follows for the case of AMSR2 and TMI intercalibration.

- Create spatio-temporal match-up Tb dataset between AMSR2 and TMI observations.

- Compute differences between observed and calculated Tbs (O-C) for both AMSR2 and TMI, over rainforest and cloud-free/calm ocean areas. Global analysis data and RTM are used to derive calculated Tbs.

- Further create "double difference" to cancel out the differences in frequency and incidence angle: AMSR2 (O-C) – TMI (O-C).

 

Data products:

The following parameters are part of the GCOM-W1 standard products: 65)

• Brightness temperature

• Total vapor power

• Total cloud liquid water

• Precipitation

• SST (Sea Surface Temperature)

• Sea surface wind speed

• Sea ice concentration

• Snow amount

• Soil moisture

Products

Observation areas

Resolution

Accuracy

Range

Release

Standard

Goal

Brightness temperature (Tb)

Global

5-50 km

±1.5 K

±1.5 K

±1.0 K (systematic)
±0.3 K (random)

2.7 - 340 K

Integrated water vapor (TPW)

Global, over ocean

15 km

±3.5 kg/m2

±3.5 kg/m2

±2.0 kg/m2

0 - 70 kg/m2

Integrated cloud liquid water (CLW)

Global, over ocean

15 km

±0.10 kg/m2

±0.05 kg/m2

±0.02 kg/m2

0 - 1.0 kg/m2

Precipitation (PRC)

Global, except cold latitude

15 km

Ocean ±50%
Land ±120%

Ocean ±50%
Land ±120%

Ocean ±20%
Land ±80%

0 - 20 mm/h

SST (Sea surface temperature)

Global, over ocean

50 km

±0.5ºC

±0.5ºC

±0.2ºC

-2 - 35ºC

Sea surface wind speed (SSW)

Global, over ocean

15 km

±1.5 m/s

±1.0 m/s

±1.0 m/s

0 - 30 m/s

Sea ice concentration (SIC)

Polar region, over ocean

15 km

±10%

±10%

±5%

0 - 100%

Snow depth (SND)

Land

30 km

±20 cm

±20 cm

±10 cm

0 - 100 cm

Soil moisture (SMD)

Land

50 km

±10%

±10%

±5%

0 - 40%

Table 5: Overview of AMSR2 standard products and their target accuracies (Ref. 17)

Product level definition: Table 2 shows a definition of AMSR2 processing levels. Tb products are available in three processing levels: Level-1B, -1R, and -3. The Level-1B product contains Tb values in swath format with native spatial resolution of each frequency channel. On the other hand, the Level-1R product provides resolution-matched Tbs by some sort of beam pattern matching procedure with the Backus-Gilbert method . Because of the significant differences in the spatial resolution, it is not straightforward to combine Tbs at different frequency channels. This Level-1R product aims to ease this difficulty for data users. Four resolution sets (6, 10, 23, 36 GHz) and raw swaths of 89 GHz A/B scan are included in a Level-1R granule. For example, in the 10.65 GHz resolution set, Tbs at 10.65, 18.7, 23.8, 36.5, and 89.0 GHz channels are stored, by lowering the spatial resolutions of the channels at 18.7 GHz and higher. Spatio-temporally averaged Tbs are available in the Level-3 product at 0.1/0.25 degrees and 10/25 km resolutions in the equidistant cylindrical and polar stereo projection methods, respectively. 66)

Processing level

Contents

Level-1A

- Swath data with geolocation information
-Scene counts
- ½ orbit starting from northern/southern-most latitudes

Level-1B

- Swath data with geolocation information
- Brightness temperatures
- ½ orbit starting from northern/southern-most latitudes

Level-1R

- Swath data with geolocation information
- Spatial-resolution matched brightness temperatures
- 4 resolution sets (6,10,23,36 GHz) and raw swath for 89 GHz A/B

Level-2

- Swath data with geolocation information
- Geophysical parameters (8 parameters)
- ½ orbit starting from northern/southern-most latitudes

Level-3

- Grid data with 0.1/0.25 degrees (10/25 km) resolution
- Brightness temperatures and geophysical parameters
- Daily and monthly temporal average
- Equidistant cylindrical and polar stereo projection

Table 6: Definition of AMSR2 processing levels

 

Assessment of the C-band RFI (Radio Frequency Interference):

Figure 30 shows the spatial distribution of the Tb difference between 6.925 and 7.3 GHz vertical polarization channels. Since the frequency difference of these two bands are small, the Tbs emitted from natural targets should be similar. Therefore, large differences may indicate potential RFI signals, although these differences in some areas such as over ice sheet and intense precipitation areas may be the real natural signal. In Figure 30, the red color (blue color) indicates the area where Tbs at 6.925 GHz (7.3 GHz) are potentially contaminated by RFI. A significant amount of RFI signatures over the U.S., Japan, and some parts of Europe to India in the 6.925 GHz vertical polarization channel is similar to those of AMSR-E. The RFI signatures at the 7.3 GHz channels seem to be more widespread. Over land, they are evident over Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, Russia, and so forth. Also, the frequency of occurrences of the 7.3 GHz RFI is higher over the ocean. However, the most important fact is that the spatial distributions of the RFI signatures at these two bands are quite different. Also, there are still many areas with small Tb difference between the two bands, indicating the areas free from RFI (Ref. 66).

GCOM_Auto8

Figure 30: Spatial distribution of AMSR2 Tb difference between 6.925 and 7.3 GHz channels of descending passes on July 25, 2012 (image credit: JAXA)

Figure 31 shows statistics of Tb difference between 6.925 and 7.3 GHz vertical polarization channels from July 2012 to January 2013. From the average panel (upper left), the same characteristics can be confirmed as in Figure 30. Typical RFI signatures indicate periodical fluctuations, some from actual time variations and some from observing the azimuth angle dependence. Therefore, the standard deviation panel (lower felt) also indicates potential RFI signatures.

GCOM_Auto7

Figure 31: Spatial distribution of statistics of AMSR2 Tb difference between 6.925 and 7.3 GHz channels of descending passes during from July 2012 to January 2013. Average (upper-left), standard deviation (lower-left), maximum (upper-right), and minimum (lower-right), image credit: JAXA

The maximum (upper-right) and minimum (lower-right) panels show potential RFIs in 6.925 and 7.3 GHz channels, respectively. In addition to RFI over land, clear signatures can be found over ocean, particularly around Japan and Hawaii in the 7.3 GHz channel, and around Ascension island in the 6.925 GHz channel. As shown in the minimum panel over the tropical to mid-latitude areas, Tbs at 7.3 GHz channel are much more sensitive to precipitation signals than at 6.925 GHz. On the other hand, the Tbs at the 6.925 GHz channel are significantly higher than those at the 7.3 GHz channel over the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets, indicating volume scattering. Probably for similar reasons, the Tbs at 6.925 GHz are slightly higher over the desert, Tibetan Plateau, and high-latitude land regions. Those natural signals should be distinguished from the RFI signals. Currently, the project is testing simple RFI identification methods by using the Tb difference between the 6.925 and the 7.3 GHz channels. The method seems to work well over the United States, where the RFI at the 6.925 GHz channel is dominant. However, it may not work over the areas with RFIs at both frequency channels, such as Eastern Europe and India. To construct a robust method of RFI identification, it would be necessary to use other channels in combination with the Tb difference between the 6.925 and 7.3 GHz channels. The project is working on the revised method to flag the RFI contaminated footprints (Ref. 66).

 



 

GCOM-C1 (Global Change Observation Mission- Cimate 1) Mission/Shikisai

The GCOM-C1 program was approved by Japanese Space Activity Commission in December, 2009.

• The system design and EM design of GCOM-C1 including SGLI started in July 2009

• The SGLI PDR was over in March, 2010. The manufacturing of SGLI EM has been started.

• The CDR (Critical Design Review) of GCOM-C1 satellite system was held in Feb. 2013, and JAXA has started manufacturing the flight model components of GCOM-C1 satellite. 67)

In July 2017, the GCOM-C project received the nickname Shikisai (meaning colors in Japanese). The nickname was chosen by JAXA in a public contest. 68)

 

Spacecraft:

The GCOM-C1 spacecraft is 3-axis stabilized. Power of > 4.25 kW is provided at EOL (End of Life). The spacecraft on-orbit dimensions are (deployed configuration): 4.6 m (X) x 16.3 m (Y) x 2.8 m (Z).

The spacecraft has a mass of about 2093 kg at launch (dry bus mass of 1374 kg, propellant mass of 176 kg, SGLI mass of 400 kg). The satellite generates power of 4 kW. The design life is 5 years.

GCOM_Auto6

Figure 32: Illustration of the GCOM-C1 spacecraft (image credit: JAXA) 69)

 

Launch: A launch of GCOM-C1 is scheduled for 2017 on an H-IIA vehicle from TNSC (Tanegashima Space Center), Japan.

Orbit: Sun-synchronous orbit, altitude = 798 km, inclination of 98.6º, LTDN (Local Time on Descending Node) at 10:30 hours.

RF communications: The S-band is used for TT&C data transmission: TT&C data rates at 29.4 kbit/s (USB), 1 Mbit/s (QPSK,) and 1.6 kbit/s in SSA (S-band Single Access). Command data rates: 4 kbit/s (USB), 125 kbit/s (SSA). The payload data downlink in X-band (8105 MHz) with a data rate of 138.76 Mbit/s, modulation = OQPSK (Offset Quadrature Phase Shift Keying). Direct real-time downlink of payload data to receiving stations with agreement.

Real-time observation data over Japan are transmitted by X-band to JAXA's ground stations at Katsuura, or EOC (Earth Observation Center at Hatoyama, Saitama). The received data are distributed immediately after Level-1 data processing.

Global observation data observed by SGLI are transmitted in X-band to KSAT (Kongsberg Satellite Services) Station in Svalbard, Norway together with some HK data. KSAT is the commercial Norwegian company. GCOM-C1 transmits telemetry stored in the onboard recorder at relatively fast data rate of 1Mbit/s to KSAT/Svalbard by S-band/QPSK..

 


 

Sensor complement: (SGLI, a single instrument is flown)

SGLI (Second-generation Global Imager):

SGLI is an advanced multi-purpose visible/infrared (VNIR, SWIR, TIR) imager of GLI heritage, flown on ADEOS-II. The objective is to measure ocean color, SST (Sea Surface Temperature), land use and vegetation, snow and ice, clouds, aerosols and water vapor, etc. 70) 71)

• The prime goal of SGLI is to retrieve global aerosol distributions. To achieve this target, SGLI will have 2 polarization channels with 3 directions

• SGLI is mainly focused to land and coastal areas. There are 11 channels with an IFOV of 250 m. GLI on ADEOS-II had only 6 channels of 250 m resolution.

The SGLI assembly features two separate sensors (radiometers) labeled VNIR (Visible Near Infrared) and IRS (Infrared Scanner). Note, the VNIR device is also referred to as VNR in the text.

VNIR is a pushbroom instrument providing 14 channels in the VNIR spectral region (actually also in the UV), 11 channels are termed VNIR-NP (VNIR Non-Polarized), and 2 channels are called VNIR-P (VNIR-Polarized). The VNIR-P channels of the polarimeter provide 3 polarization angles at: 0º, 60º, and 120º.

The VNIR-NP channels are divided into three 24º pushbroom type telescopes configured in the cross-track direction to realize the wide FOV (70º) requirement with wide spectral range (380 nm to 865 nm). Each telescope has refractive telecentric optics and 11 channels CCD on which the '11 channel bandpass filter assembly' is mounted. 72)

To realize the VNIR-P polarization observation, three linear polarization channels (0º, 60º and 120º) are set for two pushbroom telescopes which are dedicated for 670 nm and 865 nm observation. A tilting operation around the Y-axis of ±45º is required for VNIR-P to observe aerosols (scattering angle requirement). The scattering angle observation is calculated using the satellite orbital position, sun and observation target direction. A scattering angle direction between 60º and 120º is required for the aerosol retrieval over the land surface.

IRS is a whiskbroom type scanning radiometer (mechanical method) covering the SWIR (Shortwave Infrared) and TIR (Thermal Infrared) spectral regions.

SGLI has a capability of simultaneous nadir and slant observations. In addition, the sensor has a capability of along-track multiangle observation. A chance of multi-angle observations on forest areas with less cloud influence will increase comparisons with cross- track observations. In the GCOM –C1 project, global AGB (Above Ground Biomass) data will be provided as a standard product that is estimated by taking advantage of the multiangle observation capability.

GCOM_Auto5

Figure 33: Schematic view of the SGLI instruments (image credit: JAXA)

The key VNIR observation channels such as 670 nm and 865 nm are being observed with both low and high dynamic range independently according to the requirements (Table 8). The total spectral channels for SGLI are optimized to 19 channels including tilting polarization observation (there were 36 channels for GLI instrument). On the other hand, the SGLI standard products are increased from 22 products of GLI to 29 products.

The basic IFOV (Instantaneous Field of View) is set to 250 m - compared to GLI's 1 km requirement. Using this higher resolution with a wide FOV (1150 km for VNR and 1400 km for IRS), it is expected that the human activity influence on Earth's environment can be studied.

Scanning method

- Pushbroom scanning in the VNIR spectral region

- Whiskbroom scanning in the SWIR and TIR spectral region

Observation channels

- 11 channels in VNIR-NP (non polarized) from 380-865 nm
- 2 channels in VNIR-P (polarized)
- 4 channels in SWIR
- 2 channels in TIR

Swath width

- 1150 km (for all VNIR channels)
- 1400 km (for all SWIR and TIR channels)

FOV

- 70º for VNIR-NP pushbroom scanning
- 55º for VNIR-P pushbroom scanning
- 80º for SWIR/TIR for whiskbroom scanning (rotating mirror)

IFOV (Instantaneous Field of View)

- 250 m for all VNIR channels except VNIR9 (1000 m)
- 500 m for the TIR channels
- 1000 m for the SWIR channels except SWIR3 (250 m)
- 1000 m for the polarized VNIR channels

Data quantization

12 bit

Polarization

3 polarization angles for VNIR-P

Observation direction

Along-track 0º, 45º and -45º for P
Nadir for VNIR, SWIR and TIR

Absolute calibration accuracy

VNR: ≤ 3%
SWIR: ≤ 5%
TIR: ≤ 0.5 K

Table 7: Key parameters of the SGLI instrument

Channel

Center wavelength λ (nm)

Δλ (nm)

IFOV (m)
at nadir

Lλ (standard radiance)
[W/m2/sr/µm]

Lmax (max. radiance)
[W/m2/sr/µm]

SNR (Signal-to-noise ratio)

VNIR1

380

10

250

60

210

250

VNIR2

412

10

250

75

250

400

VNIR3

443

10

250

64

400

300

VNIR4

490

10

250

53

120

400

VNIR5

530

20

250

41

350

250

VNIR6

565

20

250

33

90

400

VNIR7

673.5

10

250

23

62

400

VNIR8

673.5

20

250

25

210

250

VNIR9

763

8

1000

40

350

400

VNIR10

868.5

20

250

8

30

400

VNIR11

868.5

20

250

30

300

200

Polarized channels

P1

673.5

20

1000

25

250

250

P2

868.5

20

1000

30

300

250

Table 8: Radiometric specification of the VNIR channels of SGLI

Channel

Center wavelength λ (µm)

Δλ (µm)

IFOV (m)

Lλ
[W/m2/sr/µm]
or Tstd (K)

Lmax
[W/m2/sr/µm]
or Tmax (K)

SNR
or NEΔT @ 300 K

SWIR1

1.05

0.02

1000

57

248

500

SWIR2

1.38

0.02

1000

8

103

150

SWIR3

1.63

0.2

250

3

50

57

SWIR4

2.21

0.05

1000

1.9

20

211

TIR1

10.8

0.74

500

300

340

0.2

TIR2

12.0

0.74

500

300

340

0.2

Table 9: Specification of the IRS (SWIR and TIR) channels of SGLI

The optical SGLI instrument is being designed and developed at NEC Toshiba Space, Tokyo, Japan. In turn, NEC Toshiba Space selected Sofradir of France to provide the infrared detectors for SGLI. As of 2008, Sofradir is providing concept studies for the cooled infrared MCT (HgCdTe)focal plane array detectors of the SGLI instrument. The two TIR arrays are centered on 10.8 and 12 µm wavelengths respectively, which are hybridized on a single readout circuit for accurate registration. 73) 74) 75)

GCOM_Auto4

Figure 34: Illustration of the SGLI VNIR instrument (image credit: NEC Toshiba, JAXA)

The IRS whiskbroom scanner features six channels in the region of 1.05 µm to 12 µm (Table 9). The 45º tilted scan mirror is rotated around the X-axis continuously to realize a scan of 80º for Earth observation; in addition, the onboard calibrator (blackbody, solar diffuser, and inner light source) and deep space are being scanned on each scanner revolution. Compared with the double-sided mirror employed on GLI and MODIS, the constant incident angle to the IRS scan mirror represents an advantage for the calibration function.

GCOM_Auto3

Figure 35: Illustration of the SGLI IRS instrument (image credit: NEC Toshiba, JAXA)

The observation light is directly focused onto the focal plane using a Ritchey-Chretien type telescope without any relay optics. The infrared spectral range is divided by the dichroic filter for the SWIR and TIR regions in order to optimize the detection process.

The four SWIR channels employ an InGaAs photodiode detector array cooled to -30ºC using a Peltier thermo electronic cooler. The two TIR channels use a photovoltaic type HgCdTe (PV-MCT) detector array cooled to 55 K by a Stirling-cycle cooler. The bandpass filters corresponding to the spectral channels are mounted on the focal plane in the detector packages.

The solar diffuser (made of Spectralon), the inner light source using LEDs (Light Emitting Diodes) for the SWIR channels and a high-emissivity blackbody for the TIR channels, are used as the onboard calibrator. These calibration sources and a deep space window, arranged around the scan mirror, make it possible to obtain calibration data on every scan.

Region covered

Geophysical products

Resolution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

Precise geometrically corrected image

250 m

Atmospherically corrected land surface reflectance

250 m

Vegetation index including NDVI and EVI

250 m

Vegetation roughness index including BSI_P and BSI_V

1 km

Shadow index

1 km

Land surface temperature

500 m

Fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation

250 m

Leaf area index

250 m

Above ground biomass

1 km

Land net primary production

1 km

Plant water stress trend index

500 m

Fire detection index

500 m

Land cover type

250 m

Land surface albedo

1 km

 

 

 

 

 

 

Atmosphere

Cloud flag including cloud classification and phase

 

 

 

 

 

Scene: 1 km
Global: 0.1º

Classified cloud fraction

Cloud top temperature and height

Water cloud optical thickness and effective radius

Ice cloud optical thickness

Water cloud geometrical thickness

Aerosol over ocean by visible and NIR (Near Infrared)

Aerosol over land by NUV (Near Ultraviolet)

Aerosol over land by polarization

Long -wave radiation flux

Short-wave radiation flux

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ocean

Normalized water leaving radiance

 

 

 

Coast: 250 m
Open ocean: 1 km
Global 4-9 km

Atmospheric correction parameters

Ocean photosynthetically available radiation

Euphotic zone depth

Chlorophyll-A concentration

Suspended solid concentration

Absorption coefficient of colored dissolved organic matter

Inherent optical properties

SST (Sea Surface Temperature)

Coast: 500 m, other: ditto

Ocean net primary production

Coast: 500 m, other: ditto

Phytoplankton function type

Coast: 250 m, other: ditto

Red tide

 

Multi sensor merged ocean color parameters

Coast: 250 m, open ocean: 1 km

Multi sensor merged SST (Sea Surface Temperature)

Coast: 500 m, open ocean: 1 km

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cryosphere

Snow and ice covered area

Scene: 250 m, global: 1 km

Okhotsk sea-ice distribution (Note: Okhotsk is a sea lying between the Kamchatka Peninsula on the east, the Kuril Islands on the southeast, the island of Hokkaidō to the far south, the island of Sakhalin along the west, and a long stretch of the eastern Siberian coast)

250 m

Snow and ice classification

1 km

Snow covered area in forest and mountain

250 m

Snow and ice surface temperature

Scene: 500 m, global 1 km

Snow grain size of shallow layer

Scene: 250 m, global: 1 km

Snow grain size of subsurface layer

1 km

Snow grain size of top layer

Scene: 250 m, global: 1 km

Snow and ice albedo

1 km

Snow impurity

Scene: 250 m, global: 1 km

Ice sheet surface roughness

1 km

Ice sheet boundary monitoring

250 m

Table 10: The SGLI level 2 products (Ref. 1)

 


 

GCOM ground segment and data distribution:

There will be two categories of observation data from the GCOM payload instruments: a) the global observation data set, which will be downlinked to the Svalbard station (Spitzbergen, Norway) on every orbit; b) the regional observation data around Japan (a subset), which will be downlinked to the JAXA domestic station on every pass of station visibility.

• The global observation data will be sent from Svalbard to TKSC (Tsukuba Space Center). They will be archived and processed at TKSC and be delivered to researchers and practical fields users.

• The regional observation data around Japan will be sent from the JAXA domestic station to TKSC. They also will be archived and processed at TKSC and be delivered to researchers and practical fields users.

JAXA will provide JMA (Japan Meteorological Agency) and JAFIC (Japan Fisheries Information Service Center) with the observation data of AMSR2 and SGLI, respectively. JMA and JAFIC will use them for weather forecast and sea condition information, respectively.

The TT&C (Telemetry Tracking & Command) data will be downlinked to Svalbard via X-band, and to the JAXA ground network via S-band, and be sent to TKSC. TKSC is in charge of spacecraft monitoring and control including operations planning.

GCOM_Auto2

Figure 36: Overview of the GCOM ground segment elements (image credit: JAXA)

GCOM_Auto1

Figure 37: Overview of the GCOM-W1 ground segment (image credit: JAXA/EORC)

 

In an international partnership agreement, JAXA will provide GCOM-W and GCOM-C observation data to NOAA for the continuity of NOAA user needs. 76) 77) 78)

• The AMSR2 may serve as a potential substitute for JPSS (Joint Polar Satellite System), the former NPOESS MIS (Microwave Imager Sounder).

• SGLI (Second Generation Global Imager) to provide ocean color capability not accomplished by NPP, plus augment other VIIRS capabilities.

GCOM-W and -C cooperation directly contributes to the Disaster, Water, Weather and Climate SBA (Societal Benefit Areas) by providing critical meteorological, climate and environmental observation data. The cooperation also will contribute indirectly to the other SBAs of Health, Energy, Ecosystem, Agriculture and Biodiversity.

GCOM_Auto0

Figure 38: Cooperation between JAXA and NOAA regarding AMSR2 data of GCOM-W1 (image credit: JAXA, Ref. 29)

 


1) Keizo Nakagawa, "Global Change Observation Mission (GCOM)," Proceedings of ISPRS (International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing) Technical Commission VIII Symposium, Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 9-12, 2010, URL: http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVIII/part8/headline/JAXA-Special_Session%20-%201/JTS12-0100306153736.pdf

2) T. Igarashi, "Global Change Observation Mission-Climate (GCOM-C)," Proceedings of ISPRS (International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing) Technical Commission VIII Symposium, Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 9-12, 2010, URL: http://www.tric.u-tokai.ac.jp/ISPRScom8-TC8/TC8_CD/headline/JAXA-Special_Session%20-%201/JTS14_201-00210151841.pdf

3) T. Sasaki , K. Nakagawa, "GCOM Mission Overview," Proceedings of the 26th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science) , Hamamatsu City, Japan, June 1-8, 2008

4) Information provided by Keizo Nakagawa of JAXA, Tokyo, Japan

5) K. Imaoka, "Status of the GCOM-W mission and AMSR follow on instrument," AMSR-E Joint science team meeting ,University of Hawaii at Manoa, August 13, 2005 URL: http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/AMSR/meetings2005/imaoka_status_gcomw.pdf

6) H. Shimoda, "Global change observation mission," URL: http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/COSPAR2006/00204/COSPAR2006-A-00204.pdf?PHPSESSID=7d14646d7a0631d1dc351ad1f55d038b

7) http://www.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/gcom/index_e.html

8) H. Shimoda, "Global Change Observation Missions," Proceedings of the 32nd ISRSE (International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment), San José, Costa Rica, June 25-29, 2007

9) H. Shimoda, "Global Change Observation Missions," Proceedings of IGARSS 2007 (International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium), Barcelona, Spain, July 23-27, 2007

10) http://www.jaxa.jp/pr/brochure/pdf/04/sat25.pdf

11) Haruhisa Shimoda, "Overview of GCOM," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium) 2010, Honolulu, HI, USA, July 25-30, 2010

12) Haruhisa Shimoda, "Overview of GCOM," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium), Melbourne, Australia, July 21-26, 2013

13) Misako Kachi, Keiji Imaoka, Hideyuki Fujii, Daisaku Uesawa, Kazuhiro Naoki, Akira Shibata, Tamotsu Igarashi, "Overview of the first satellite of the Global Change Observation Mission-Water (GCOM-W1)," URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/website/wcm-dc/idcplg?IdcService=GET-FILE&dDocName=PDF_CONF-P59_S1_02_KACHI_V&RevisionSelection-Method=LatestReleased-Rendition=Web

14) Haruhisa Shimoda, "Global Change Observation Mission (GCOM)," Proceedings of SPIE, 'GEOSS, CEOS, and the Future Global Remote Sensing Space System for Societal Benefits, edited by Stephen A. Mango, Stephen P. Sandford, Ranganath R. Navalgund, Haruhisa Shimoda,' Vol. 7151, 2008

15) H. Shimoda, "Overview of Japanese Earth observation programs," Proceedings of SPIE, `Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites X,' edited by Roland Meynart, Steven P. Neeck, Haruhisa Shimoda, SPIE Vol. 6361, Stockholm, Sweden, Sept. 11-14, 2006, doi: 10.1117/12.691981

16) Keiji Imaoka, Misako Kachi, Hideyuki Fujii, Daisaku Uesawa, Kazuhiro Naoki, Akira Shibata, "GCOM-W1 Status and Expected Applications," Proceedings of the 28th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Okinawa, Japan, June 5-12, 2011

17) Misako Kachi, Keiji Imaoka, Hideyuki Fujii, Daisaku Uesawa, Kazuhiro Naoki, Akira Shibata, Tamotsu Igarashi, "Overview of the first satelliteof the Global Chane Observation Mission - Water," Proceedings of the 2011 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference, 5-9 September 2011, Oslo, Norway, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/Home/Main/AboutEUMETSAT/Publications-onferenceandWorkshopProceedings/2011/groups/cps-documents/document/pdf_conf_p59_s1_02_kachi_v.pdf

18) K. Imaoka, A. Shibata, N. Ebuchi, T. Igarashi, S. Fukui, K. Tanaka, T. Kimura, T. Sezai, Y. Tange, H. Shimoda, "Overview of the GCOM-W mission and AMSR follow-on instrument," Proceedings of SPIE, Vo. 5978, 2005, pp. 49-56, `Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites IX. Edited by R. Meynart, S. P. Neeck, and H. Shimoda,' doi: 10.1117/12.631493

19) Marehito Kasahara, Norimasa Ito, Masaaki Mokuno, Keizo Nakagawa, "Development Status of GCOM Satellites," Proceedings of the 28th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Okinawa, Japan, June 5-12, 2011, paper: 2011-n-49

20) "Global Change Observation Mission (GCOM) Project Manager Keizo Nakagawa: Articulating the GCOM Project's significance and future outlook," JAXA Today, January 2012, No 5, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/activity/pr/jaxas/pdf/jaxatoday005_p.pdf

21) "Global Change Observation Mission 1st – Water "SHIZUKU" (GCOM-W1) Images of SHIZUKU's Solar Array Paddle Deployment and Orbit Calculation Result," JAXA, May 18, 2012, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2012/05/20120518_shizuku_e.html

22) "Launch Result of the Global Changing Observation Mission 1st - Water "SHIZUKU" (GCOM-W1) and the Korean Multi-purpose Satellite 3 (KOMPSAT-3) by H-IIA Launch Vehicle No. 21," JAXA, May 18, 2012, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2012/05/20120518_h2af21_e.html

23) "Shizuku Special Site," JAXA, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/countdown/f21/overview/h2a_e.html

24) "Overview of Co-payload and Secondary Payloads," JAXA, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/countdown/f21/overview/payload_e.html

25) "Japan To Launch Korean Spysat In First Foreign Contract," SpaceMart, Jan. 14, 2009, URL: http://www.spacemart.com/reports/Japan_To_Launch_Korean-Spysat_In_First_Foreign_Contract_999.html

26) Haruhisa Shimoda, "Overview of Japanese Earth Observation Programs," 9th PORSEC 2008 (Pan Ocean Remote Sensing Conference), Dec. 2-6, 2008, Gngzhou, China

27) Angelita C. Kelly, Warren F. Case, "New Small Satellites Join the International Earth Observing Constellation (A-Train)," 8th IAA Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, Berlin, Germany, April 4-8, 2011, URL: http://media.dlr.de:8080/erez4-/erez?cmd=get&src-os/IAA/archiv8/Presentations/IAA-B8-0301-1.pdf

28) Matsuaki Kato, GCOM Project Team, "Overview of JAXA's Newest Earth Observation Satellite "SHIZUKU", Application & Future plan," Proceedings of the 50th Session of Scientific & Technical Subcommittee of UNCOPUOS, Vienna, Austria, Feb. 11-22, 2013, URL: http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/pdf/pres/stsc2013/tech-51E.pdf

29) Toru Fukuda, "GCOM-W, Global Change Observation Mission W (Water)," 5th session of COPUOS (Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space), UNOOSA, Vienna, Austria, June 6-15, 2012, URL: http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/pdf/pres/copuos2012/tech-09.pdf

30) "A Regional Look at Arctic Sea Ice," NASA Earth Observatory, 18 Oct. 2017, URL: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=91139

31) "Huge Iceberg Breaks away from Antarctic Ice Sheet — Shizuku Satellite Observations Detected," JAXA, July 26, 2017, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/gcom_w/topics.html#topics10507

32) "GCOM-W: Sea Ice Hits Record Low," JAXA, Feb. 21, 2017, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/gcom_w/topics.html#topics10507

33) http://suzaku.eorc.jaxa.jp/GCOM_W/

34) "Release of the JAXA Realtime Rainfall Watch," JAXA, Nov. 2, 2016, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/gcom_w/topics.html#topics6059

35) "JAXA Realtime Rainfall Watch," JAXA, URL: http://sharaku.eorc.jaxa.jp/GSMaP_NOW/index.htm

36) "NOAA to utilize data acquired by SHIZUKU," JAXA Press Release, Sept. 05, 2014, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2014/09/20140905_shizuku.html#at

37) Paul Chang, Zorana Jelenak, Suleiman Alsweiss, Jun Park, Seubson Soisuvarn, Patrick Meyers, Ralph Ferraro, "NOAA GCOM-W1/AMSR2 Product Processing, Validation and Utilization," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society) 2014, Québec, Canada, July 13-18, 2014

38) Misako Kachi, Masahiro Hori, Takashi Maeda, Keiji Imaoka, "Status of validation of AMSR2 on board the GCOM-W1 satellite," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society) 2014, Québec, Canada, July 13-18, 2014

39) "NOAA utilizes SHIZUKU data for typhoon monitoring," Feb. 3, 2014, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/gcom_w/index.html

40) Information provided by Haruhisa Shimoda, Tokai University Space Information Center, Tokyo, Japan.

41) http://suzaku.eorc.jaxa.jp/GCOM_W/

42) "Shizuku captures 2013 Nikkei Global Environmental Technology Award," JAXA, Oct. 17, 2013, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2013/10/20131017_shizuku_e.html

43) Maria-José Viñas, "Arctic Sea Ice Minimum in 2013 is Sixth Lowest on Record," The Earth Observer, NASA, Nov.-Dec. 2013, Vol. 25, Issure 6, pp: 24-25, URL: http://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/eo_pdfs/Nov_Dec_2013-final_color.pdf

44) "Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches New Maximum Extent," NASA Earth Observatory, Oct. 1, 2013, URL: http://www.earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php-id=82160&src=twitter

45) Elizabeth Howell, "Antarctic Sea Ice Takes Over More Of The Ocean Than Ever Before," Universe Today, Oct. 31, 2013, URL: http://www.universetoday.com/105952/antarctic-sea-ice-takes-over-more-of-the-ocean-than-ever-before/

46) Norimasa Ito, Marehito Kasahara, Keiji Imaoka, Keizo Nakagawa,"Result of Initial Calibration and Validation of AMSR2 on GCOM-W1," Proceedings of the 29th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Nagoya-Aichi, Japan, June 2-8, 2013, paper: 2013-n-01

47) "Shizuku (GCOM-W1) to Provide Geophysical Quantity Products," JAXA, May 17, 2013, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2013/05/20130517_shizuku_e.html

48) "Shizuku (GCOM-W-1) to Provide Brightness Temperature Products," JAXA, Jan. 25, 2013, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2013/01/20130125_shizuku_e.html

49) Misako Kachi, Keiji Imaoka, Takashi Maeda, Arata Okuyama, Kazuhiro Naoki, Masahiro Hori, Haruhisa Shimoda, Taikan Oki, "Status and Validation Results of the AMSR2 Geophysical Parameters," Proceedings of the 29th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Nagoya-Aichi, Japan, June 2-8, 2013, paper: 2013-n03

50) "SHIZUKU cooperates with MIRAI on Arctic Ocean investigation and observations," JAXA, Oct. 1, 2012, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/gcom_w/topics_e.html

51) "Global Change Observation Mission 1st – Water "SHIZUKU" (GCOM-W1) Regular Observation Operations," JAXA, Aug. 10, 2012, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2012/08/20120810_shizuku_e.html

52) Misako Kachi, Keiji Imaoka, Masahiro Hori, Kazuhiro Naoki, Takashi Maeda, Arata Okuyama, Marehiro Kasahara, Norimasa Ito, Keizo Nakagawa, Haruhisa Shimoda, Taikan Oki, "Status of the first satellite of the Global Change Observation Mission-Water (GCOM-W1)," Proceedings of the 2012 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference, Sopot, Poland, Sept. 3-7, 2012, URL: http://www.eumetsat.int/Home/Main/AboutEUMETSAT/Publications/Conference-andWorkshopProceedings/2012-roups/cps/documents/document/pdf_conf-p61_s1_05_kachi_v.pdf

53) Marehito Kasahara, Keiji Imaoka, Misako Kachi, Hideyuki Fujii, Kazuhiro Naoki, Takashi Maeda, Norimasa Ito, Keizo Nakagawa, Taikan Oki, "Status of AMSR2 on GCOM-W1," Proceedings of SPIE Remote Sensing 2012, 'Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites,' Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, Vols. 8531-8539, Sept. 24-27, 2012

54) "Water Shizuku (GCOM-W1) regular observation operations," August 13, 2012, URL: http://www.houseofjapan.com/aeronautics/water-shizuku-gcom-w1-regular-observation-operations

55) "SHIZUKU Observation Data Acquired by AMSR2," JAXA, July 4, 2012, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2012/07/20120704_shizuku_e.html

56) "Global Change Observation Mission 1st - Water 'SHIZUKU' (GCOM-W1) Inserted into A-Train Orbit," JAXA, July 2, 2012, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2012/07/20120702_shizuku_e.html

57) "Global Change Observation Mission 1st – Water "SHIZUKU" (GCOM-W1) Images of SHIZUKU's Solar Array Paddle Deployment and Orbit Calculation Result," JAXA, May 18, 2012, URL: http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2012/05/20120518_shizuku_e.html

58) http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/AMSR/meetings-2006/pdf/yamanashi2006amsre-jtsm_gcom.pdf

59) Takamasa Itahashi , Keizo Nakagawa, "Thermal design overview of AMSR2/GCOM-W1 satellite," Proceedings of the 27th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science) , Tsukuba, Japan, July 5-12, 2009, paper: 2009-f-02

60) K. Imaoka, M. Kachi , M. Kasahara, N. Ito, K. Nakagawa, T. Oki, "Instrument Performance and Calibration of AMSR-E and AMSR2," Proceedings of ISPRS (International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing) Technical Commission VIII Symposium, Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 9-12, 2010, URL: http://www.tric.u-tokai.ac.jp/ISPRScom8/TC8/TC8_CD/headline/JAXA_Special-Session%20-%201/JTS13_20100322190615.pdf

61) Taikan Oki, Keiji Imaoka, Misako Kachi, "AMSR instruments on GCOM-W1/2: Concepts and applications," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium) 2010, Honolulu, HI, USA, July 25-30, 2010

62) Daisaku Uesawa, Keiji Imaoka, Misako Kachi, Hideyuki Fujii, Masahiro Kazumori, Marehito Kasahara, Norimasa Ito, Keizo Nakagawa, Taikan Oki, "Status of GCOM-W1 development and expected meteorological applications," Proceedings of the SPIE Remote Sensing Conference, Toulouse, France, Vol. 7826, Sept. 20-23, 2010

63) K. Imaoka, M. Kachi , M. Kasahara, N. Ito, K. Nakagawa, T. Oki, "Instrument Performance and Calibration of AMSR-E and AMSR-2," International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, Volume XXXVIII, Part 8, Kyoto, Japan, 2010, URL: http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVIII/part8/headline-JAXA_Special-Session%20-%201/JTS13-20100322190615.pdf

64) http://suzaku.eorc.jaxa.jp/GCOM_W/w_amsr2/amsr2_body_main.html

65) Global Change Observation Mission 1st Research Announcement, "AMSR2 on GCOM-W1 Algorithm, Validation, and Application," Jan. 14, 2008, URL: http://sharaku.eorc.jaxa.jp/AMSR/AMSR2_RA/documents/GCOM_RA1_E.pdf

66) Keiji Imaoka, Arata Okuyama, Takashi Maeda, Misako Kachi, Marehito Kasahara, Norimasa Ito, Keizo Nakagawa, "Status of AMSR2 Brightness Temperature Products," Proceedings of the 29th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Nagoya-Aichi, Japan, June 2-8, 2013, paper: 2013-n-02

67) Keizo Nakagawa, Masaaki Mokuno, Kazuhiro Tanaka, Tsuyoshi Maeda, "Development Status of GCOM-C1 Satellite System," Proceedings of the 29th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Nagoya-Aichi, Japan, June 2-8, 2013, paper: 2012-n-05

68) "GCOM-C renamed SHIKISAI," JAXA, July 14, 2017, URL: http://global.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/gcom_c/

69) Keiji Imaoka + many contributors, "JAXA Earth Observation Missions," Mini-Workshop on A-Train Science, Tokyo, Japan, March 8, 2013, URL: http://suzaku.eorc.jaxa.jp/GCOM_W/materials/atrainws_mar2013/3_Imaoka.pdf

70) Yoshiaki Honda, "Overview of GCOM-C1/SGLI Science," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium) 2010, Honolulu, HI, USA, July 25-30, 2010

71) Hiroshi Murakami, Masahiro Hori, Takashi Nakajima, Mitsuhiro Toratani, Teruo Aoki, Makoto Kuji, Yoshiaki Honda, "Preparation of GCOM-C1 Science Mission," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society) 2014, Québec, Canada, July 13-18, 2014

72) Atsuo Kurokawa, Yasuhiro Nakajima, Shinji Kimura, Hiroshi Atake, Yoshihiko Okamura, Kazuhiro Tanaka, Shunji Tsuida, Kenichi Ichida, Takahiro Amano, "High-precision narrow-band optical filters for global observation," Proceedings of the ICSOS (International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Application) 2012, Ajaccio, Corsica, France, October 9-12, 2012, URL: http://icsos2012.nict.go.jp/pdf/1569607351.pdf

73) P. Chorier, A. Dariel, L. Vial, A. Poupinet, M. Vuiliermet, P. Tribolet, "Sofradir advances in Infrared detectors for Space Applications," Proceedings of the 26th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science) , Hamamatsu City, Japan, June 1-8, 2008

74) Yoshihiko Okamura, Kazuhiro Tanaka, Takahiro Amano, Masaru Hiramatsu, Koichi Shiratama, "Design and bread-boarding activities of the Second-generation Global Imager (SGLI) on GCOM-C," Proceedings of the 7th ICSO (International Conference on Space Optics) 2008, Toulouse, France, Oct. 14-17, 2008

75) Yoshihiko Okamura, Kazuhiro Tanaka, Takahiro Amano, Masaru Hiramatsu, Koichi Shiratama, "Breadboarding activities of the Second-generation Global Imager (SGLI) on GCOM-C," Proceedings of SPIE, 'Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XII,' edited by Roland Meynart, Steven P. Neeck, Haruhisa Shimoda, Shahid Habib, Vol. 7106, 71060Q-1, Cardiff, UK, Sept. 15, 2008

76) Pete Wilczynski, "Global Change Observation Mission (GCOM)," Apr. 10, 2010, URL: http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/itwg/itsc/itsc17/session9/9.11_wilczynski.pdf

77) "U.S.-Japan scientific cooperation strengthened with launch of new environmental monitoring satellite," NOAA, May 17, 2012, URL: http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2012/20120517_usandjapan.html

78) Hiroshi Murakami, "SGLI & GLI data policy," International Ocean Color Science (IOCS) Meeting, Darmstadt, Germany, May 6-8, 2013, URL: http://iocs.ioccg.org/wp-content/uploads/1415-hiroshi-murakami-iocs-data-sgli-murakami-201305-v1.pdf
 


The information compiled and edited in this article was provided by Herbert J. Kramer from his documentation of: "Observation of the Earth and Its Environment: Survey of Missions and Sensors" (Springer Verlag) as well as many other sources after the publication of the 4th edition in 2002. - Comments and corrections to this article are always welcome for further updates (herb.kramer@gmx.net).

GCOM-W1    Launch   Mission Status    Sensor Complement   GCOM-C1   Ground Segment
References   Back to Top