Minimize ALOS-2 (Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2) / Daichi-2

ALOS-2 (Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2; SAR mission) / Daichi-2

Spacecraft     Launch    Mission Status     Sensor Complement    Ground Segment    References

ALOS-2 is the follow-on JAXA L-SAR satellite mission of ALOS (Daichi) approved by the Japanese government in late 2008. The overall objective is to provide data continuity to be used for cartography, regional observation, disaster monitoring, and environmental monitoring.

The post-ALOS program of JAXA has the goal to continue the ALOS (nicknamed Daichi) data utilization - consisting of ALOS-2 (SAR satellite) and ALOS-3 (optical satellite) in accordance with Japan's new space program.

In 2010, ALOS has been operated for more than four years since January 2006 to accomplish four mission goals, including: cartography, regional observations, disaster monitoring, and resource surveys. ALOS-2 will continue the L-band SAR observations of the ALOS PALSAR (Phased Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar) and will expand data utilization by enhancing its performance. Table 2 shows the major observation advantages of the planned ALOS-2 mission when compared with the ALOS PALSAR. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9)

Note: The ALOS (Daichi) spacecraft was retired on May 12, 2011. The JAXA recovery team had been trying to communicate with ALOS for about three weeks after it developed a power generation anomaly.

Disaster monitoring
(secure the public safety)

- To contribute to the nation's disaster prevention activities through fast access to damaged areas during serious disasters in Japan, Asia and so on, as well as continuous monitoring of subsequent disasters and/or recovery/reconstruction status over the areas.
- To contribute to improving disaster prediction accuracy, etc. by providing disaster-related organizations with InSAR data necessary for deformation forecast/monitoring.

Land monitoring
(preserve and manage national land)

- To provide national land information in a timely manner and promote its utilization based upon archived data developed by wide range of observation data as well as its continuous acquisitions.

Agricultural monitoring
(facilitate food supply)

- To contribute to sophistication and sustainability of agriculture by providing related organizations with the observation data necessary for evaluation of irrigated rice.

Natural resource Exploration (facilitate natural resources & energy supply)

- To contribute to enhancing the method of natural resource exploration by providing related organizations with the observation data necessary for detecting oil and mineral resources in the ground and seabed.

Global forest monitoring
(resolve global-level environmental issues)

- To contribute to solving global warming issues by providing related organizations with data derived from global monitoring of tropical rain forests to identify carbon sinks.

Table 1: Overview of the ALOS-2 primary mission objectives

Observation parameter

ALOS (launch 2006)

ALOS-2 (launch 2014)

Observation frequency

- Revisit time: 46 days

- Revisit time: 14 days

-Daytime observation is limited by sharing with optical observation

- No conflict

- Incidence angle : 8-60º
- Right-side looking

- Incidence angle: 8-70º
- Right- or left-side looking observation capability

Spatial resolution

- Strip map: 10 m
- ScanSAR: 100 m

- Strip map: 3 m /6 m /10 m
- ScanSAR: 100 m
- Spotlight: 1 m x 3 m

Table 2: SAR instrument comparison between ALOS and ALOS-2



Figure 1: Long-Term Plan of JAXA Earth Observation (image credit: JAXA) 10)

Japan is an earthquake-prone and volcanic country where two-thirds of the land area is covered by forestry. The L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), which was aboard the past two satellites, namely FUYO-1 (JERS-1) between 1992 and 1998 and DAICHI (ALOS) between 2006 and 2011, is a sensor using a radio wave (microwave), and it enables observations of land surface conditions even during the night and under bad weather. The special feature of the L-band radio wave (whose wave length is about 24 cm) is an ability to gather information from the land surface by penetrating vegetation such as forests (too a certain extent), thus it can acquire changes on the land more precisely compared to other band's SAR when some diastrophism takes place due to an earthquake or a volcanic activity. 11)

DAICHI-2 (ALOS-2) is equipped with a global-leading L-band SAR (PALSAR-2) to conduct a health check mainly of the earth's land areas in details. The observation performance has been improved to more promptly conduct accurate observations of the surface while maintaining a wide observation band. Hence, it will acquire more useful data that is directly related to our safe life as it can observe not only diastrophisms but also floods or landslides caused by a natural disaster, such as a storm or a gale, accurately in a timely manner. Its predecessor, DAICHI, responded to many requests for disaster monitoring from overseas, and, as a result, Japan was able to receive a lot of image data from foreign satellites in return in addition to those taken by the DAICHI when we were hit by the Great East Japan Earthquake. This data was very helpful to understand the situation of the unprecedented huge natural disaster in Japan. We would like to maintain this international cooperation framework with the DAICHI-2.

Besides natural disaster observations, the DAICHI-2 will regularly observe tropical rain forestry, which is difficult to observe optically due to thick clouds covering it frequently, as well as snow and ice conditions in the polar areas. By combining observation data acquired over more than 11 years, we will keep observing the time elapse to capture changes of forestry, which is a greenhouse gas sink, as well as the transformation of snow and ice due to the greenhouse gas effect. By doing so, we will contribute to environmental issues on a global scale.

With the L-band SAR, which is one of Japan's specialties that has been inherited for a long time, the DAICHI-2 is a "national project" that contributes to safety and security in cooperation with domestic and overseas pertinent agencies. As an engineer, I am proud of participating in such an important project while I feel a heavy responsibility throughout the development of the satellite. I will do my utmost to achieve this project's mission goal by launching and operating it smoothly in order to meet the expectations of its users and, eventually, of the people who are the ultimate beneficiaries.




The ALOS-2 system is developed by Mitsubishi Electric Corporation under contract to JAXA (Japan Aerospace and Exploration Agency).

A proper description of the spacecraft will be provided when available.

Precise positioning using GPS: ALOS-2 is equipped with spaceborne dual-frequency GPS receivers using both L1 and L2 bands, and demonstrated precise navigation on orbit. However, to achieve higher resolution observation and more accurate orbit maneuvering for next Earth observation satellites, an advanced GPS receiver was necessary. The JAXA Guidance and Control Group has been conducting a series of studies for a next-generation spaceborne GPS receiver. In this development, an enhancement of navigation accuracy is a major theme, and the new receiver will be reinforced with the ability to receive multiple frequencies and multiple channels to meet with GPS modernization. 12)


Figure 2: Artist's rendition of the ALOS-2 spacecraft in orbit (image credit: JAXA)

Recently, an algorithm of enhancing navigation accuracy especially when using the L1 band only by reducing the error due to ionospheric delay has been developed Based on the algorithm developed in this work, a software installed in the GPS receiver for ALOS-2 is developed (Ref. 4).

Real-time GPS L1 navigation:

- In monitoring disasters, real-time navigation using L1 signal is important

- Algorithm of enhancing navigation accuracy is developed (estimate of ionospheric delay and its change)

- Measurement accuracy < 10 m (95%, 3Drss).

Offline precise positioning:

- Dual (L1 and L2) off-line position determination < 1m

- ALOS-2 SAR frequency is overlapped with L2 signal

- Enhanced low-noise amplifier for GPS receiver with endurance against SAR signal is being developed


Figure 3: GPS L2 signal and SAR frequency allocation used in ALOS and ALOS-2


Sun-synchronous orbit: altitude = 628km, inclination = 97.9º
Local sun time : 12:00 ± 15 min
Revisit time: 14 days; number of cycles/day: 15 3/14
Orbit control: ≤ ± 500 m

Mission design life

5 years ( with a goal of 7 years)

Spacecraft mass

2120 kg

Spacecraft size (deployed)

9.9 m (x) x 16.5 m (y) x 3.7 m (z)

Spacecraft power generation

5.2 kW (EOL)

Downlink communications

X-band: 800 Mbit/s (16 QAM), 400/200 Mbit/s (QPSK)
Ka-band: 278 Mbit/s (QPSK) via the DRTS (Data Relay Technology Satellite) of JAXA


H-IIA launch vehicle from TNSC

Table 3: Overview of major spacecraft parameters


Figure 4: Illustration of the deployed ALOS-2 spacecraft (image credit: JAXA) 13) 14)

Agile spacecraft: ALOS-2 has a body pointing function of ±30º in the roll axis. For the purpose of minimizing observation intervals, the requirement for attitude maneuvering is up to 2 minutes from the Earth pointing attitude to right- or left-looking, and the maneuvering from right- to left-looking (or from left- to right-looking) is up to 3 minutes, as shown in Figure 5.

To achieve a high agility of maximum attitude rate, 0.7º/s in roll axis, one Reaction Wheel (RW) is aligned with the roll axis, and the other four RWs are mutually skewed. This RW assembly was developed by the JAXA GCG (Guidance and Control Group), and establishes more than 0.9 Nm output torque and maximum momentum 40 Nms (at 3200 rpm). The numerical simulation results of attitude pointing are summarized in Table 4.


No of RWs


Result (seconds)

Nominal to Right- or Left

4 (case A)
4 (case B)

Up to 2 minutes


Right- to Left (or Left- to Right)

4 (case A)
4 (case B)

Up to 3 minutes


Table 4: Simulation results of attitude maneuvering. Case-A stands for the RW aligned roll axis failure, and Case-B for one of the skewed RWs failure


Figure 5: Conceptual image of attitude pointing (image credit: JAXA)

RF communications: The requirement calls for a payload data transmission rate of 800 Mbit/s in X-band. With a traditional modulation scheme of QPSK, the transmission speed peaks at about 400 Mbit/s since the frequency bandwidth allocation is limited to 375 MHz by the ITU (International Telecommunication Union) regulations.

To solve this problem, the project designed and developed XMOD (Multi-mode High Speed Modulator), capable of achieving a (max) data rate of 800 Mbit/s. The XMOD device has the following features, not only to achieve the 800 Mbit/s data rate, but also to target strong international competitiveness as well as high system reliability. 15) 16) 17)

1) Use of a 16QAM 16 (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation) scheme to enable the 800 Mbit/s data rate, regarded as the world's highest RF data rate, implemented as a single X-band carrier.

2) Adoption of the QPSK (Quadrature Phase Shift Keying) technique to comply with existing ground stations and improve robustness.

3) Implementation of a "Multi-mode/Multi-rate" design capable of supporting various satellite projects.

4) Introduction of some cutting-edge techniques for space and a high reliability design to improve the tolerance to space radiation effects.

5) Reduction of XMOD in size and mass by boosting double-sided mounting techniques and applying small lightweight parts.

• Baseband module: The baseband module consists of the following devices:

- WizardLink family of multi-Gigabit Serializer/Deserializers (Ser/Des)

- SRAM-based FPGA (Virtex-4QV)

- High-speed Digital-to-Analog Converter (DAC5675A-SP)

- antifuse-FPGA

- TCXO (Temperature Compensated Crystal Oscillator).

• RF module: The RF modules performs quadrature modulation on the I-channel and Q-channel signals generated by the baseband module, and then the modulated signals are amplified as desired.

• Load oscillator module: The local oscillator module generates the X-band local carrier frequency for the quadrature modulator

• DC/DC: The DC/DC converter, 30V-53V unregulated bus support, supplies regulated DC power to all the XMOD modules


Figure 6: Block diagram of XMOD (image credit: JAXA)

Modulation scheme

16QAM without differential coding
QPSK with differential coding

Data rate

800, 400, or 200 Mbit/s

Frequency bandwidth

< 275 MHz: @ 800, or 400 Mbit/s (specification), 238.3 MHz (obtained result)
< 150 MHz: @ 200 Mbit/s (specification), 123.3 MHz @ 200 Mbit/s (obtained result)


Data: WizardLink
RF: Coaxial

Operating temperature

-20 to + 50ºC

Operating voltage

30 to 53 VDC

RF output power

+5 dBm ± 1 dB

Power consumption

≤ 25.5 W (specification), 19.02 W (obtained result)


≤ 3.36 kg, internal redundancy (specification), 2.64 kg (obtained result)


277 mm x 106 mm x 186 mm (max), internal redundancy

Table 5: Specification of the XMOD device


Figure 7: Photo of the XMOD EM (Engineering Model), image credit: JAXA

ALOS-2 has an improved data handling function which consists of a high-rate and huge-amount storage system, MDHS (Mission Data Handling System), and two types of high-rate transmission systems, DT (Direct Transmission) and DRC (Dual -Receive Channel), as shown in Figure 8. MDHS has a data storage volume of 130 GB. MDHS collects mission data from PALSAR-2 and health monitoring data from other components, and carries out digital processing such as adding of forward error correction code, file pointer management, and so on. It can be operated in various modes such as simultaneous record and replay, replay follow write, this scheme will contribute to flexible data handling operations.


Figure 8: Illustration of the MDHS scheme regarding data transmission (top) and the data collection scheme (bottom), image credit: JAXA

The PALSAR-2 Electric Unit (ELU) consists of System Controller (SC), Data Processor (DP), as shown in Figure 37. SC receives command from satellite and sends telemetry to satellite. DP compresses mission data and sends it to MDHS.


Figure 9: Photo of the ALOS-2 proto flight model at JAXA's Tsukuba Test Facility in April 2012 (image credit: JAXA) 18)


Launch: ALOS-2 (Daichi-2) was launched on May 24, 2014 (03:05 UTC) on a H-IIA F24 vehicle (No 24) from the Yoshinobu Launch Complex at TNSC (Tanegashima Space Center), Japan. The launch provider was MHI (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.). At about 15 minutes and 47 seconds after liftoff, the separation of the DAICHI-2 was confirmed. 19) 20) 21) 22)

The secondary missions on the ALOS-2 mission by JAXA were: 23)

• Rising-2, a cooperative microsatellite (43 kg) project of Tohoku University (Sendai) and Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

• UNIFORM-1 (University International Formation Mission-1), of Wakahaya University, Wakayama, Japan.

• SOCRATES (Space Optical Communications Research Advanced Technology Satellite), a microsatellite (~ 50 kg) mission of NICT (National Institute of Information and Communications Technology), Koganei, Japan.

• SPROUT (Space Research on Unique Technology), a nanosatellite of ~7 kg of Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan.


Figure 10: Photo of the secondary payloads integrated on the adapter ring of the second stage (image credit: JAXA)

Orbit: Sun-synchronous near-circular sub-recurrent orbit, altitude = 628 km, inclination = 97.9º, period = 97.4 minutes, revisit time = 14 days, number of orbits/day = 15 3/14, LSDN (Local Sun time on Descending Node) = 12:00 hours ± 15 min.

To achieve higher coherence of interferometry, autonomous accurate orbit maneuvering (within 500 m orbital tube) and enhanced GPS receiver with endurance against L-band SAR signal were developed. The orbit control requirement to satisfy the geometric restriction which arises from the repeat-pass SAR interferometry, is illustrated in Figure 11. The reference Earth-fixed flight path is defined for a repeat cycle of its orbit. ALOS-2 satellite must fly within a tube-shaped corridor, the center of which is the reference flight path. The radius of the tube-shaped corridor, 500 m, is the tolerance of an orbit error. The orbit prediction, based on a detailed perturbation model, is introduced to generate the reference flight path. Using it as a reference of orbit maintenance, unnecessary orbital maneuvers can be avoided.


Figure 11: Schematic view of the recurrent error with respect to reference orbit (image credit: JAXA)

As a result of numerical simulations, throughout the mission life, orbit maintenance within the 500 m tube was verified to be accomplished 99.7% of the time, which exceeds the requirement of 95%. An average period between orbit maneuvers was 4.9 days for in-plane maneuver and 176 days for out-of-plane maneuver. The minimum interval of in-plane maneuvers during active solar period was estimated 1.5 days. This means the autonomous orbit maintenance is essential for this mission in terms of operational aspects.

The on-board software of ALOS-2 can handle operations of orbit determination, maneuver prediction and planning, and maneuver executions for both drag-makeup maneuvers and inclination maneuvers. This feature of autonomy is expected to be great help for efficient ground operations of ALOS-2. 24) 25)


Figure 12: Flow chart of autonomous orbit control algorithm (image credit: JAXA)



Mission status:

• March 23, 2017: Last November's magnitude 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake in New Zealand was so complex and unusual, it is likely to change how scientists think about earthquake hazards in plate boundary zones around the world, finds a new international study. 26)

- The study, led by GNS Science, Avalon, New Zealand, with NASA participation, is published this week in the journal Science. The team found that the Nov. 14, 2016, earthquake was the most complex earthquake in modern history. The quake ruptured at least 12 major crustal faults, and there was also evidence of slip along the southern end of the Hikurangi subduction zone plate boundary, which lies about 20 km below the North Canterbury and Marlborough coastlines. 27)

- Lead author and geodesy specialist Ian Hamling of GNS Science says the quake has underlined the importance of re-evaluating how rupture scenarios are defined for seismic hazard models in plate boundary zones worldwide. "This complex earthquake defies many conventional assumptions about the degree to which earthquake ruptures are controlled by individual faults, and provides additional motivation to re-think these issues in seismic hazard models," Hamling says.

- The research team included 29 coauthors from 11 national and international institutes. To conduct the study, they combined multiple datasets, including satellite radar interferometry and GPS data that measure the amount of ground movement associated with the earthquake, along with field observations and coastal uplift data. The team found that parts of New Zealand's South Island moved more than 5 m closer to New Zealand's North Island and were uplifted by as much as 8 m.

- The Kaikoura earthquake rupture began in North Canterbury and propagated northward for more than 170 km along both well-known and previously unknown faults. It straddled two distinct active fault domains, rupturing faults in both the North Canterbury Fault zone and the Marlborough Fault system.

- The largest movement during the earthquake occurred on the Kekerengu fault, where pieces of Earth's crust were displaced relative to each other by up to 25 m, at a depth of about15 km. Maximum rupture at the surface was measured at 12 m of horizontal displacement.

- Hamling says there is growing evidence internationally that conventional seismic hazard models are too simple and restrictive. "Even in the New Zealand modeling context, the Kaikoura event would not have been included because so many faults linked up unexpectedly," he said. "The message from Kaikoura is that earthquake science should be more open to a wider range of possibilities when rupture propagation models are being developed."

- The scientists analyzed interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data from the Copernicus Sentinel-1A and -1B satellites, which are operated by the European Space Agency, along with InSAR data from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency's ALOS-2 satellite. They compared pre- and post-earthquake images of Earth's surface to measure land movement across large areas and infer movement on faults at depth. The Sentinel and ALOS-2 satellites orbit Earth in near-polar orbits at altitudes of 600 and 700 km, respectively, and image the same point on Earth at repeat intervals ranging from six to 30 days. The Sentinel and ALOS-2 satellites use different wavelengths, which means they pick up different aspects of surface deformation, adding to the precision and completeness of the investigation.

- In the spirit of international cooperation, both space agencies had re-prioritized their satellites immediately after the quake to collect more images of New Zealand to help with research and support the emergency response activities.

- Before the earthquake, coauthors Cunren Liang and Eric Fielding of NASA/JPL ( Jet Propulsion Laboratory), Pasadena, California, developed new InSAR data processing techniques to measure the ground deformation in the satellite flight direction using wide-swath images acquired by the ALOS-2 satellite. This is the first time this new approach has been successfully used in earthquake research. "We were surprised by the amazing complexity of the faults that ruptured in the Kaikoura earthquake when we processed the satellite radar images," said Fielding. "Understanding how all these faults moved in one event will improve seismic hazard models."

- The authors say the Kaikoura earthquake was one of the most recorded large earthquakes anywhere in the world, enabling scientists to undertake analysis in an unprecedented level of detail. This paper (Ref. 27) is the first in a series of studies to be published on the rich array of data collected from this earthquake.


Figure 13: Two ALOS-2 satellite images show ground displacements from the Nov. 2016 Kaikoura earthquake as colors proportional to the surface motion in two directions. The purple areas in the left image moved up and east 4 m; purple areas in the right image moved north up to9 m (image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/JAXA)

• March 6, 2017: JAXA released the global DSM (Digital Surface Model) dataset with a horizontal resolution of approx. 30 m mesh (1 arcsec) free of charge. The dataset has been compiled with images acquired by ALOS/ Daichi (Advanced Land Observing Satellite). The dataset is published based on the DSM dataset (5 m mesh version) of the "World 3D Topographic Data", which is the most precise global-scale elevation data at this time, and its elevation precision is also at a world-leading level as a 30 m mesh version. This dataset is expected to be useful for scientific research, education, as well as the private service sector that uses geospatial information. 28)

1) Release history:

- May and October 2015: Japan and a part of individual continent released as Beta Version (Total 7,279 tiles).

- April 2016: Version 1 covering Japan and a part of individual continent released (Total 7,278 tiles).

- May 2016: Global terrestrial region (within approx. 82 deg. of N/S latitudes) of Version 1 released (approx. 22,100 tiles).

- March 2017: Update with void-filled DSM within 60 deg. of N/S latitudes as Version 1.1 [Updated]. Void pixels due to clouds and snow pixels within 60 deg. of north and south latitudes in Version 1 were complemented by existing DEMs. Out of the areas are same with Version 1 product.

2) Descriptions of the AW3D30 DSM dataset

- Resolution: 1 arcsec (approx. 30m mesh) containing 1 deg. lat/long tile.

- Height accuracy: 5 meters as standard deviation (1 sigma)

- Composition:

DSM (Height above sea level, signed 16bit GeoTIFF) The calculated elevation value by average (AVE) and median (MED) when resampling from 5-meter mesh version. The nearest neighbor (NN) is considered in next version)

Mask information file (8bit GeoTIFF)

Stacked number file (8bit GeoTIFF, DN=number of stacking)

Quality assurance Information (ASCII text, add information for 1 arcsec product to original 5-m mesh DSM information)

Header file (ASCII text)

New mask values have been defined to release Version 1.1 product. Please refer to "Product Format Description Ver.1.1" for the details of dataset (PDF format, 309KB).

3) Download

Please confirm processing status and qualities i.e. clouds by "Thumbnail of publishing AW3D30" on the top for your area of interests. The published area will be expanding to all over the world near future.
Please register your information from following URL to download the dataset. It is required your e-mail address.

This is temporally registration and will send e-mail you to accept your registration request. After the confirmation of your request, the download information will send by e-mail. The dataset download site is:

4) Terms of Use for ALOS Global Digital Surface Model (AW3D30)

This dataset is available to use with no charge under the following conditions.

- When the user provides or publishes the products and services to a third party using this dataset, it is necessary to display that the original data is provided by JAXA.

- You are kindly requested to show the copyright (© JAXA) and the source of data When you publish the fruits using this dataset.

- JAXA does not guarantee the quality and reliability of this dataset and JAXA assume no responsibility whatsoever for any direct or indirect damage and loss caused by use of this dataset. Also, JAXA will not be responsible for any damages of users due to changing, deleting or terminating the provision of this dataset.


Figure 14: ALOS Global Digital Surface Model "ALOS World 3D - 30m" (AW3D30), image credit: JAXA/EORC)

• On November 15, 2016 at 23:00 UTC, an emergency observation with the PALSAR-2 aboard ALOS-2 (Daichi-2) was performed in response to the magnitude 7.8 earthquake in New Zealand on November 13, 2016 at 1:36 (UTC). Figure 15 shows the observation area. JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) has provided the acquired data to corresponding authorities. 29)

- Figure 16 shows a differential interferometry (DInSAR) result derived from the PALSAR-2 data acquired before (October 18, 2015; UTC) and after (November 15, 2016; UTC) the earthquake. Two major deformation regions were found, approx. 100 km length deformation in north west of Clarence and approx. 70 km length deformation in south west of Kaikoura. Over 3m deformation close to the satellite (eastward and / or upward movement) was detected in the west region of Clarence. The deformation should be larger in the area between the Kekerengu Fault and the Clarence Fault.


Figure 15: Area of the emergency observation in New Zealand (image credit: JAXA/EORC)


Figure 16: DInSAR result using the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 data acquired before (October 18, 2015; UTC) and after (November 15, 2016; UTC) the earthquake (image credit: JAXA/EORC)

• On November 13, 2016, JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) and and the JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) launched the "JICA-JAXA Forest Early Warning System in the Tropics" (JJ-FAST) service, easily accessible from PCs and smartphones to obtain information based on deforestation and forest change data for tropical regions using JAXA's Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 (ALOS-2). 30)

- Between 2009 and 2012, JICA and JAXA supported the monitoring of illegal logging in the Amazon Basin of Brazil in near-real time using observation data from ALOS, the predecessor to ALOS-2. The ability of ALOS to penetrate clouds made it possible to constantly monitor tropical forests during the rainy season. More than 2,000 incidents of illegal logging were detected by ALOS in Brazil, which greatly contributed to a 40 percent reduction in illegal logging areas.

- Building on the knowledge obtained through these efforts, JICA and JAXA then agreed to monitor deforestation and forest changes in tropical regions around the world using data from ALOS-2, and announced the "Initiative for Improvement of Forest Governance" at the Japan pavilion of the twenty-first session of the Conference of the Parties (COP21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Paris in 2015.

- JJ-FAST was established as part of this initiative, and will provide the latest information on deforestation and forest changes in tropical regions globally, on an average of once every 45 days. JJ-FAST can be accessed by anyone anywhere under an environment capable of connecting to the Internet.

- When the service begins, the data for five countries in Latin America will be released. The target area will expand gradually to African and Asian regions. The final goal for JJ-FAST is to release monitoring data of approximately 60 countries that have tropical forests. The detection accuracy of deforestation in JJ-FAST will be improved according to user feedback.

- Because of its ability to monitor vast forest areas from space, JJ-FAST can be an effective means to monitor forests for developing countries that have problems doing so due to inadequate infrastructure, public security issues, a shortage of qualified personnel or budgetary issues. JICA and JAXA support sustainable forest management for developing countries through the spread of JJ-FAST, and are dedicated to reducing deforestation with the long-term aim of mitigating climate change.

• January 28, 2016: JAXA developed a whole-globe forest map of 25-meter resolution, "Global Forest/Non-forest map", using the DAICHI-2 (ALOS-2) launched on May 24, 2014, and released it from today free of charge. For achieving a long-term objective of controlling global warming that was set by the UN COP21 (United Nations Conference of Parties 21) held in Paris in December 2015, it is imperative to globally understand and maintain forests which are an important source of absorbing CO2. To tackle such a global-scale issue, JAXA, in cooperation with JICA ( Japan International Cooperation Agency), will establish a "Forest Monitoring System" in the next Japan fiscal year starting in April 2016. Data from the Global Forest/Non-forest map will also be used for the above system as its basic information. 31)

- In recent years, deforestation has been expanding in tropical and sub-tropical areas and is one of the causes of global warming. Therefore, the United Nations and many governments in the world place priority on understanding forest areas and maintaining them as important measures against global warming for political decisions. The L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2 (PALSAR-2) aboard the DAICHI-2 with its high sensitivity and resolution uses a radio wave of long wave length (about 24 cm) that is suitable for observing the existence of forests (natural forests) and the current status of forest use. It can also perform observations regardless of weather conditions or time (day or night) hence it is especially advantageous to measure forests in tropical areas which are covered by clouds almost all around the year.

- JAXA provided observation data of forest areas by the PALSAR aboard the DAICHI (ALOS) between 2007 and 2010, and it was utilized for monitoring illegal deforestation of the tropical rain forest in the Amazon region by the Brazilian government. As the Daichi's operations were completed in 2011, monitoring by the DAICHI had been halted since then.

- JAXA plans to provide the Global Forest/Non-forest map by the DAICHI-2 once a year to contribute to measures against global warming through the understanding of forest distribution. With this data, we can grasp the reduction and increase of forests in each area in the world based on spatial and temporal changes. Therefore, it is expected to be useful for government organizations around the world for their forest maintenance plans such as which area should be prioritized for monitoring and maintenance.


Figure 17: The COP21 set a long-term objective of controlling the average temperature increase in the world within the 1.5º Celsius range compared to that of the pre-industrial revolution, and that was well below the previously mentioned 2º Celsius range (image credit: JAXA).

- In the next Japan fiscal year starting from April 2016, JAXA plans to release more frequent change information on tropical forests to the world through the "Forest Monitoring System", which will be implemented in cooperation with JICA ( Japan International Cooperation Agency). 32)


Figure 18: Deforestation on Borneo Island observed between 2010 and 2015 based on observations by synthetic aperture radars on the DAICHI and DAICHI-2 (image credit: JAXA)

• Jan. 21, 2016: Corresponding to emergency requests from NASA and the International Charter of Space and Major Disasters for flooding of the Mississippi River, JAXA performed an emergency observation over the area by means of PALSAR-2 (Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2 ) aboard ALOS-2/Daichi-2 in the period January 6-16, 2016. 33)


Figure 19: On Jan. 16, 2016, JAXA acquired this estimated inundation map of the Mississippi in the New Orleans region (image credit: JAXA/EORC)

• August 19, 2015: JAXA has been observing the volcanic activity of Sakurajima, Japan, using the ALOS-2/Daichi-2 spacecraft, following a request from the Coordinating Committee for Prediction of Volcanic Eruptions of JMA (Japan Meteorological Agency). JAXA was asked to perform an emergency observation as there had been a warning of an eruption since August 16, 2015. 34)

- The acquired data are being immediately provided to the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI) and other related disaster preparation organizations, and being analyzed for crustal deformation.


Figure 20: ALOS-2 interferometry map of Sakurajima showing large deformation (inflation) of the summit area (image credit: JAXA)

Legend to Figure 20: The image shows the comparison result of the data acquired on January 4 and August 16, 2015. The deformation of up to about 16 cm closer toward the satellite was observed at the area on the east side of the Minamidake Summit of Sakurajima (indicated by the white square).

• August 2015: The performance of the ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 instrument was confirmed during the initial calibration and validation phase of Aug. 4 – Nov. 20, 2014. Within this phase, all the PALSAR-2 modes were evaluated for raw data characteristics and quality of the SAR images, and the SAR images were calibrated geometrically and radiometrically using the natural forest in the amazon and the corner reflectors deployed globally. In total, 58 antenna beams from the six modes [i.e., spotlight (84 MHz), ultrafine (84 MHz), high sensitive-full polarimetry (42 MHz), high resolution, ScanSAR narrow (350 km), and ScanSAR wide (490 km)], were calibrated using the Amazon forest. The geometric accuracy of the standard product is 5.34 m RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), and radiometric stability is 0.4 dB using the Amazon data. The other parameters of the SAR image qualities, i.e., resolution, NESZ (Noise-Equivalent Sigma Zero), PSLR (Peak-to-Sidelobe-Ratio), etc., meet the requirement to the SAR image quality. In this evaluation phase, the other SAR quality was evaluated as well. i.e., INSAR, Polarimetry, forest observation and so on. 35)

The calibration instruments are the corner reflectors, active radar calibrator, receiver, and the distributed targets in the Amazon Forest. First, the raw data were evaluated especially on the saturation rate and the signal to noise ratio. Second, the antenna elevation patterns were determined using the distributed targets in the Amazon region. Since the PALSAR-2 has 116 beams prepared for operating in the basic observation scenario, all the calibration activities required an extremely large number of the operational time in the initial calibration of the PALSAR-2 instrument — a total of 3.5 months were needed, and 58 beams have been calibrated. Then, the radiometric calibration and validations were performed using the globally distributed CR and the Amazon data, which shows the constant gamma-zero performance wrt the incidence angle. The geometric calibration of the PALSAR-2 was conducted using the location of the CRs. Then, the PALSAR-2 data were evaluated for their image quality. The results of the PALSAR-2 image quality were summarized in Table 6 and the sample image of Figure 21. As a result of the initial calibration, the PALSAR-2 has shown an extremely good performance with a high quality of the SAR imagery.





Geometry (RMSE)

High resolution/
Spotlight mode

5.34m(L1.1) / 6.73 m (L2.1)


20 m

ScanSAR mode

60.77 m (L1.1)/29.93 m (L2.1)


100 m


Corner reflector

1.31 (CF: -81.60)
0.406 (CF: -82.34)
-41.1(F)/ -36.0(H)/-36.6(U)
-49.2(F)/ -46.0(H)

30 scenes

1.0 dB
1.0 dB:-6.84 dB@Amazon


VV+HH phase (deg)
Cross talk (dB)

1.0143(σ: 0.06)
0.350(σ: 0.286)
-43.7(σ: 6.65) hv/hh
-44.0(σ: 7.10) vh/vv
-48.2(σ: 6.05) corr


5 deg
-30 dB
-30 dB
-30 dB

Resolution (m)


High resolution [3 m]
High resolution[6 m]
High resolution[10 m]

0.79(σ: 0.028)/1.66(σ: 0.04)
2.81(σ: 0.034)/1.70(σ: 0.022)
4.06(σ: 0.108)/3.53(σ: 0.317)
5.05(σ: 0.110)/5.36(σ: 0.126)


1.00 x 1.1/1.78
2.75 x 1.1/1.78
3.75 x 1.1/3.57
5.00 x 1.1/5.36


PSLR (azimuth)
PSLR (range)
ISLR (Integrated Sidelobe Ratio)

-16.20(σ: 2.53)
-12.59(σ: 1.84)
-8.80(σ: 3.23)


-13.26 dB+2 dB
-13.26 dB+2 dB
-10.16 dB+2 dB




7 scenes

20~25 dB
25 dB

Table 6: Summary of the initial calibration as of November 20 2014


Figure 21: Sample PALSAR-2 image in the 84 MHz mode with HH polarization (image credit: JAXA)

• July 3, 2015: Corresponding to an emergency request from Sentinel Asia related to a GLOF (Glacial Lake Outburst Flood) reported in Bhutan on June 28, 2015, JAXA performed an emergency observation at 5:59 (GMT) on July 2, 2015 by means of PALSAR-2 (Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2) aboard the Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 (ALOS-2, "DAICHI-2"). 36)

- According to an ALOS dataset, "the Glacial Lake Inventory of Bhutan using ALOS ("DAICHI") data", two glacier lakes with GLOF potential as Lake A and B are located in [89°34'50.0"E; 28°4'7.7"N] and [89°36'7.7"E; 28°6'54.1"N] in a headwater of the Mo Chu river basin, in western Bhutan.


Figure 22: Location of the glacier lakes in the Bhutan Himalaya region (image credit: JAXA/EORC)


1) GLOF (Glacial Lake Outburst Flood) was reported in western Bhutan on June 28, 2015 (local time).

2) Emergency observation of PALSAR-2 onboard ALOS-2 was performed on July 2, 2015 by JAXA, corresponding to a request from Sentinel Asia.

3) Remarkable change in lake area is recognized in Lake A (ICIMOD id: mo_gl_200). The area increased between March 8 and April 23 (+48.0%) and then decreased between April 23 and July 2 (-52.9%) in 2015.

4) Collapse of a moraine edge is recognized near Lake A after the GLOF event.


Figure 23: Temporal area changes of Lake A and B (image credit: JAXA/EORC)

- From this result, Lake A has a higher potential as the source of the GLOF. It is located at a glacier terminus surrounded by a moraine. These obtained results have been contributed to a governmental organization of Bhutan. JAXA would carry out rapid observations against such a mountain hazard in remote regions in cooperation with concerned authorities. Related results would be distributed to relevant organizations and this website (Ref. 36).

• May 14, 2015: JAXA concluded an agreement with the Kyushu Regional Development Bureau of the MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) on April 30, 2015, to provide observation data by theALOS-2/Daichi-2 mission. The purpose of the agreement is to survey (1) secular changes of landscape and ash fall and (2) isolated islands for their up keep. The two parties will work together to conduct surveys more efficiently with broader covering areas by mutually sharing and studying observation data possessed by the Kyushu Regional Development Bureau and JAXA's satellite data. 37)

• May 7, 2015: JAXA has performed observations of the 2015 Nepal earthquake, which struck on April 25, 2015 (local time), with the PALSAR-2 (Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2) instrument aboard ALOS-2/Daichi-2. The emergency observations were requested from Sentinel Asia and the International Charter. 38)

• JAXA observed the crustal deformation due to the quake over Kathmandu area with the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 data.

• The deformation area extended more than 100 km from north to south. The land around the center of Kathmandu moved toward the satellite about 1 meter.

• Several local displacements, detected around Kathmandu, indicate the occurrence of ground subsidence that possibly causes the damage of roads and buildings.

• Further detailed analysis detected buildings and road areas damaged by the disaster.

Table 7: Summary of the Nepal earthquake investigation

- The project applied an interferometric analysis to the PALSAR-2 data acquired before (Feb. 21, 2015) and after (May 2, 2015) the quake to map the crustal deformation. Figure 24 illustrates the whole interferogram obtained by the analysis. Colored fringes denote the change of LOS (Line-of-Sight) distance (distance between the satellite and the ground) between the two observation dates. The dense fringes distributed throughout the image show that the deformation extended at least 100 km from north to south. A large elliptical fringe at just south of the image center means that LOS distance became shortened, and the land at the center of the fringe moved at least 1.5 meter. The center of Kathmandu moved toward the satellite approximately 1 meter. A different ellipsoidal fringes at the north side means that the LOS distance was extended. Note that the noise, distributed over the north side,is due to the change of surface conditions between the observations, such as snow cover.


Figure 24: Interferogram obtained by the analysis of the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 data acquired before (Feb. 21) and after (May 2) the quake (image credit: JAXA)

Legend to Figure 24: Observation mode: Stripmap Fine (10 m resolution), swath width: 70 km. The red star and black line circles indicate the epicenters of the main shock (Mw 7.8) and the aftershock (more than Mw 5), respectively.

- Figure 25 shows an enlarged image over central Kathmandu. Several local-scale displacements are found in the boxes (1) and (2). The land at the box (1) moved by up to 30 cm in the satellite-ground direction compared to the outside of the box. The local displacements possibly caused different damages of structures depending on the area. According to the quick report from the in situ investigation by Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Japanese Geotechnical Society, and Japan Association of Earthquake Engineering, ground subsidence and damage of roads and buildings were found at the box (2) (Figure 26). JAXA and its partners continue to look for similar changes in the interferogram and to share the information with the in situ investigators.


Figure 25: PALSAR-2 interferogram around Kathmandu; local displacements are found in the box (1) and (2), image credit: JAXA


Figure 26: In situ photo taken on May 1 at the grey-color point in the box (2), image credit: Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Japanese Geotechnical Society, and Japan Association of Earthquake Engineering

- Figure 27 shows the prospective damaged building and road areas obtained by difference of coherence analysis for the box (2) area in Figure 25. The analysis evaluates the difference of coherence obtained before the disaster (Oct. 4, 2014 - Feb. 21, 2015) and between the disaster (Feb. 21, 2015 - May 2, 2015). The large difference indicates a large radar image difference between the three observations. The large radar image difference includes the collapse of buildings, the damage of roads, changes of agricultural fields, and snow cover. A significant decrease of coherence is observed for the areas, where buildings and roads are damaged.


Figure 27: Prospective damaged buildings and road areas obtained by the difference of coherence analysis for the box (2) area in Figure 25 (image credit: JAXA)

JAXA will collaborate with the relevant organization, and continue the observation of this stricken region. The data and analysis results were provided to the International Charter, "Space and Major Disasters".

• May 5, 2015: JAXA has been performing the emergency observations with the PALSAR-2 (Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2 (PALSAR-2) aboard ALOS-2/Daichi-2 for monitoring the effects of an earthquake struck Nepal on April 25, 2015. JAXA analyzed the PALSAR-2 data acquired on April 26, 2015, 7:02 (GMT) over Kathmandu. Figure 28 shows the coverage area of the data. 39)


Figure 28: The coverage area of the PALSAR-2 data acquired on April 26, 2015 (red box), image credit: JAXA

- Figure 29 shows the overall image obtained with the high-resolution 3 m mode (dual polarization). The color composite in the image represents HH polarization in red, HV polarization in green, and HH/HV in blue. The different colors in the image indicate different backscattering signals from the ground. The bright purple and green colors generally indicate buildings. The color difference depends on the difference of urban structures or building shapes and do not directly show the damage.


Figure 29: The overall image observed by PALSAR-2 (red: HH, green: HV, blue: HH), image credit: JAXA

- An enlarged image of a part of Kathmandu is shown in Figure 30. The project compared it with an image acquired before the earthquake (March 3, 2015) with 10 m resolution mode. Although the observation resolutions and angles of two images were different, the dark color areas after the earthquake probably indicate the damages of buildings. The yellow circles (1) and (2) are the locations of the Durbar square and the Dharahara (Bhimsen) tower.


Figure 30: The enlarged image at a part of Kathmandu. Top: after the earthquake (April 26, 2015), bottom: before the earthquake (March 13, 2015), image credit: JAXA

• Jan. 23, 2015: After the calibration and validation of ALOS-2/CIRC (Compact Infrared Camera), JAXA confirmed the data quality of ALOS-2/CIRC is adequate. All ALOS-2/CIRC data is available from CIRC observation data search, if user follows the CIRC data policy. The ultimate goal of the CIRC project is to minimize the damage and impact caused by forest fires, as well as contributing to urban planning and our understanding of volcanic disasters. 40)

• PALSAR-2 shows the 13 dB of SNR, 5 dB larger than PALSAR and very small saturation.

• Radiometric and geometric performances of all the modes (SL, UB, HB, FB, WB, and VB) meet the mission requirements (i.e., 0.4 dB radiometry, 5.34 RMSE of geometry, quite low NESZ, resolution of all the modes, cross talk of the polarimetry of -40 dB)

• Interferometry performance, polarimetric performance were confirmed and deformation detection could be conducted.

• Initial Calibration of the PALSAR-2 has been successfully conducted(Nov. 20, 2014) and the data distribution has been started.

• ALOS-2 observation phase has started for the global observation based on BOS (Basic Observation Scenario) on Aug. 20, 2014.

• Polar regions were well covered. The forest region is not fully covered for 2014 (50%).

• The daily data acquisition volume is 800 GB.

• RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) is the biggest issue of the L-band SAR image quality.

• Ionospheric issue will be considered the further investigation

Table 8: Summary of the PALSAR-2 instrument performance parameters as of the end of January 2015 41)

JAXA declared the ALOS-2/Daichi-2 mission "operational" as of Nov. 25, 2014. Regular provision of observation data started today after the completion of the commissioning phase (i.e., completion of functional confirmation and of calibration operations). 42)

• Sept. 30, 2014: JAXA captured images of depressions and deposition of falling ash following of Japan's Mt. Ontake's volcanic eruption on Sept. 27,2014 through emergency observations by the ALOS-2 (Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 /Daichi-2). The observations were conducted according to a request from the Coordinating Committee for Prediction of Volcanic Eruptions (Secretariat: Japan Meteorological Agency) and the Cabinet Office (Disaster Management) under the agreement with ministries related to disaster management. The acquired data was provided for confirming geographical changes and the accumulation of falling ash. JAXA continues to observe Mt. Ontake in cooperation with the disaster management agencies. 43)

- Figure 31 shows a comparison between the images near the peak of Mt. Ontake taken on Aug. 18, prior to the volcanic eruption (right), and on Sept. 29 (left) after the eruption. The images were shot by the PALSAR-2 (Phased Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2) instrument aboard Daichi-2. The PALSAR-2 can capture the status of the volcanic crater without being hampered by fumes by seeing through them thanks to its long radio wave length of L-band (1.2 GHz bandwidth). In the left image (after the eruption), a new depression measuring 210 m in length and 70 m in width was newly created due to the eruption. This seems to be an exhaust vent hole (volcanic orifice) freshly formed this time.


Figure 31: Comparison before and after the eruption near the peak of Mt. Ontake. No depression was found prior to the eruption in the area circled in yellow (image credit: JAXA)

Figure 32 is an extraction of changes observed from the observation images near Mt. Ontake peak taken from the same orbit on Aug. 18 and Sept. 29. Changes are colored in purple. It is estimated that falling ash has been accumulated near the peak crater through the satellite images. The observation were performed facing the right side (west to east) from the ascending node orbit (moving over Japan from south to north) .


Figure 32: Accumulation of falling ash at Mt. Ontake peak observed by PALSAR-2 (image credit: JAXA)

• July 2014: The CIRC (Compact Infrared Camera) instrument, a demonstration imager intended for observing forest fires, volcanoes, and heat island phenomena, captured its first images after the initial functional verification phase (July 4-14, 2014). Figure 33 demonstrates the advantage of infrared sensors, which can obtain images even at night. The image color represents surface temperature, with black representing the lowest temperature while yellow represents the highest. 44)


Figure 33: CIRC midnight image of the Chugoku region and Shikoku in Japan acquired on July 11, 2014 (image credit: JAXA)

• June 27, 2014: JAXA acquired PALSAR-2 (Phased Array Type L-band Aperture Radar-2) imagery aboard ALOS-2 (Daichi-2) as shown on Figure 34. The left image of Figure 34 is of Izuoshima Island on Japan's coast. The right image is a bird's-eye view image compiled by using altitude data acquired by the PRISM aboard the Daichi. One can still see the scars of the large-scale landslide caused by Typhoon No. 26 in October 2013, even though almost eight months have passed (the dark area circled in red.) The vegetation has not recovered there yet. Image 34 was colored spuriously using polarization data acquired through observations in order to understand the land cover classification more precisely. Roughly speaking, green indicates vegetation, light purple and yellow-green are urban areas, and dark purple is barren areas. 45)


Figure 34: Observation image of Izuoshima Island by PALSAR-2 (image credit: JAXA)

• May 27, 2014: JAXA confirmed via telemetry that the attitude control system of the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS-2/Daichi-2) shifted to the regular operation mode. With this confirmation, scheduled important operations of the critical phase including the deployment of antennas for direct communications and mission instruments were all achieved, thus the critical operations phase 1 of the DAICHI-2 was completed. 46)

- The satellite is now in a stable condition - and will move to the initial functional verification operation phase2 to verify the function of the satellite onboard instruments for about two and half months.

• May 26, 2014: JAXA confirmed that the L-band synthetic aperture radar (PALSAR-2) antenna of the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS-2 /Daichi-2) was deployed successfully (the second wing deployment). With this confirmation, the PALSAR-2 antenna deployment operation was completed. The satellite is now in a stable condition. 47) 48) 49)


Figure 35: Schematic view of the PALSAR-2 deployment sequence diagrams (image credit: JAXA)


Figure 36: PALSAR-2 depolyment (image credit: JAXA)



Sensor complement: (PALSAR-2, CIRC, SPAISE2)

PALSAR-2 (Phased Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2):

PALSAR-2 is an L-band SAR instrument based on APAA (Active Phased Array Antenna) technology. The APAA of ALOS-2 allows not only conventional stripmap and ScanSAR, but also Spotlight mode observations with electronic beam steering in the range and azimuth directions. To cover wide area observations, PALSAR-2 offers the capability of wide incidence angle (8º - 70º) electronic beam steering as well as a means for left-side or right-side looking observations from the satellite ground track; the required spacecraft maneuver for this observation change can be accomplished in about 2 minutes from the nominal nadir look direction. 50) 51) 52) 53) 54) 55) 56) 57)

System design: The PALSAR-2 system is composed of two subsystems: the Antenna subsystem (ANT) and the Electric Unit (ELU).

ELU: The key components of the ELU are Exciter (EX), Transmitter (TX), Receiver (RX), Digital Processor (DP), and System controller (SC).

As for the RF signal, EX generates the pulse, selects two chirp signals (up / down and phase modulation) with selected center frequencies of either 1257.5, 1236.5 or 1278.5 MHz in order to avoid the interference into RNSS (Radio Navigation Satellite Service) using the L-band, and stretches the signal to the selected bandwidth at either 84 MHz, 42 MHz, 28 MHz or 14 MHz. The received radar echo signal is compressed by the BAQ (Block Adaptive Quantization) or the improved BAQ algorithm. The compression mode is selected from 4 bit, 2 bit, and no compression with or without the improved compression mode. Figure 37 shows the system diagram of PALSAR-2.


Figure 37: System diagram of PALSAR-2 (image credit: JAXA)

Tables 9 and 10 summarize the specification and the PALSAR-2 system parameters.

Radar carrier center frequency

1236.5 / 1257.5 / 1278.5 MHz (selectable)

Band, wavelength

L-band, 22.9 cm

PRF (Pulse Repetition Frequency)

1500 to 3000 Hz

Range of bandwidths

14 / 28 / 42 / 84 MHz


Single / dual / full / compact (compact polarization is an experimental mode)

Look direction

Right or left

Beam steering range

Elevation: ±30º; Azimuth: ±3.5º

Antenna width, length

2.9 m, 9.9 m

Incidence angle

8º to 70º

Range resolution, azimuth resolution

3 m / 6 m / 10 m / 100 m, 1 m / 3 m / 6 m / 10 m / 100 m

Peak power radiation

3.3 kW with 3/5 aperture in Spotlight and Ultra-fine mode
6.1 kW with full aperture in High-sensitive, Fine and ScanSAR mode

Mass of the SAR antenna

547.7 kg

Mass of the SAR ELU (Electric Unit)

109.1 kg (ELU controls all SAR signal generations and beam management)

Table 9: PALSAR-2 system parameters


Figure 38: Schematic diagram of PALSAR-2 elements (image credit: MELCO)

Parameter \ Mode








1257.5 MHz

1257.5 MHz or 1236.5 / 1278.5 MHz, selectable

Incidence angle

8º to 70º range


84 MHz

84 MHz

42 MHz

28 MHz

14 MHz

Ground resolution

3 m (rg) x 1 m (az)

3 m

6 m

10 m

100 m


25 km (rg) x 25 km (az)

50 km

50 km
(FP:30 km)

70 km
(FP:30 km)

350 km
5 looks







Data rate

800 Mbit/s

800 Mbit/s

800 Mbit/s

400 Mbit/s

400 Mbit/s


-24 dB

-24 dB

-28 dB

-26 dB

-26 dB

S/A: range

25 dB

25 dB

23 dB
FP:Co-pol: 23 dB
FP:X-pol: 15 dB

25 dB
FP:Co-pol: 20 dB
FP:X-pol: 10 dB

25 dB

S/A: azimuth

20 dB

25 dB

20 dB

23 dB

20 dB

Table 10: Summary of the PALSAR-2 specifications

The specification of Table 10 is defined for an incidence angle of 37º above the equator. The polarization acronyms are as follows:

- SP: Single Polarization

- DP: Dual Polarization

- FP: Full Polarization (quad)

- CP: Compact Polarization (experimental mode).


Figure 39: Illustration of conventional PALSAR-2 polarization modes (same as implemented on PALSAR), image credit: JAXA


Figure 40: Schematic view of new polarization mode CP of PALSAR-2 (image credit: JAXA)

The enhanced instrument performance of ALOS-2, enabled through the right-and-left looking observation capability, will greatly expand the FOR (Field of Regard) of the satellite, up to about 3 times (from 870 km on Daichi to 2,320 km), for event monitoring services.


Figure 41: SAR antenna orientation shown in nadir (left) and in right-side looking direction (right), image credit: JAXA


Figure 42: Schematic view of the spotlight mode configuration (image credit: JAXA)


Figure 43: Observation modes of PALSAR-2 on ALOS-2 (image credit: JAXA)

L-band SAR antenna (ANT): ANT is an active phased array antenna which steers the beam in both elevation and azimuth direction (±30º in elevation and ±3.5º in azimuth). It has a size of 9.9 m (azimuth) x 2.9 m (elevation) and is composed of 5 electrical panels. The antenna consists of 1,080 radiation elements which are driven by 180 TRMs (Transmit and Receive Modules). The design enables to steer and form the beam in elevation and azimuth direction for several imaging modes: Stripmap, Spotlight and ScanSAR. The antenna nominal pointing is in the nadir direction and it is pointing 30º sideways when observing (either to the left side or to the right side of the ground track). 58)


Figure 44: PALSAR-2 antenna configuration (image credit: JAXA, MELCO)

The SAR antenna is a DRC (Dual Receive Channel) system (Figure 45):

- The full aperture (5 panels) or partial aperture ( 3 of 5 panels, No 2, 3 and 4) of the antenna aperture may be used for signal transmission (Tx). The peak radiation power is 3,300 W with three panels for Spotlight mode and Ultra-Fine mode, or 5,100 W with full aperture for High sensitive mode, Fine mode and ScanSAR mode.

- In receive, the antenna is divided into two separate partitions in along-track. The signals of both receiving antenna partitions are being detected and recorded separately; this concept permits wide-swath acquisitions.

Wide swath coverage for polarimetric observation: ALOS-2 SAR utilizes a type of polarimetry as single, dual and quad (full-pol.) as a standard mode, and compact (or hybrid) as an experimental mode. Full-pol. mode on ALOS-2 is a system which realizes transmitted polarization by replacing horizontal / vertical by turns with an interval of PRI (Pulse Repetition Interval). Therefore, when selecting full-pol. mode, the PRF of full-pol. is doubled as that of single/dual-pol., which means that the available swath in full-pol. is drastically restricted. In the case of conventional mode ("fine mode": resolution of 10 m), the range coverage of full-pol. becomes 30 km, which is less than a half of single/dual-pol. (70 km).

The wider coverage of full-pol. is also achieved by using the DRC method. Since the full-pol. mode requires two receive channels for H and V polarization synchronously, utilization of the DRC mode for full-pol. requires double channels compared with the conventional full-pol. Mode, namely quad- receive channel. For the purpose of wide coverage and observation capability in higher incidence angles for full-pol. mode, ALOS-2 can execute the DRC and full-pol. observation simultaneously, in "high sensitive mode" (HS mode). The swath of the full-pol. mode in HS mode is 40-50 km with a resolution of down to 6 m in an off-nadir angle of 18-35º.

Another approach for wider coverage of polarimetric observation is a new technique of "compact (or hybrid) polarimetry". Since one T/R module of ALOS-2 has two identical amplifiers for H and V polarimetry, RF signals of H/V polarization with an optimum phase offset is generated from each antenna element, and resultantly circular or oriented at 45º is transmitted. Although polarimetric information of compact pol. is not enough compared to that of full-pol., the swath of compact polarimetry is wider than that of full-pol., and is the same as that of single/dual polarimetry mode.


Figure 45: Single transmit/ antenna system (left) and difference of PRF (right), image credit: JAXA)

Legend to Table 10: Performance values @ incidence angle of 37º; CP: Compact Polarimetry (Linear+circular), FP: Full Polarimetry (HH+HV+VV+VH).

TRMs (Transmit Receive Modules):

The TRMs enable to select the polarization of single (HH/VV/HV), dual (HH + HV=VV + VH), quad (HH + HV + VV + VH), and compact polarimetry (Tx: oriented 45º or circular, Rx: H or V) by transmitting H and V polarization simultaneously. In L-band, the propagation disturbances and especially the ionospheric effects like Faraday rotation and phase delay have to be considered and if possible to be corrected. The quad polarimetry mode uses the alternative pulses of H and V which increase the PRF and result in a narrow swath.

The SAR instrument features a CP (Compact Polarimetry) mode as an experimental mode which can transmit the H and V polarization simultaneously resulting in a linear polarization oriented at 45º or circular (LHCP or RHCP), selectable by command.

Compared to the TRMs used in PALSAR, establishing higher power amplification in the TRMs of PALSAR-2 through a wider operational frequency range is necessary, as summarized in Table 11. An output power of 34 W is generated at the PALSAR-2 TRM output port with a low-loss and high-power solid state power amplifier using a GaN (Gallium Nitride) HEMT (High Electron Mobility Transistor). - The performance of a HPA (High-Power Amplifier) using GaN HEMT is tested by a breadboard model and confirmed to meet the requirement. Figure 46 shows the outside view of the HPA and the inside view of the BBM (Breadboard Model).

Item or parameter



HPA (High Power Amplifier)

Si BJT (Bipolar Junction Transistor)


Tx power

25 W

34 W

Operational frequency range

28 MHz

85 MHz

Number of TRMs






Noise figure

2.9 dB

2.9 dB

TRM size

203 mm x 117 mm x 23.5 mm

200 mm x 110 mm x 14.6 mm

TRM mass

675 g

400 g

Table 11: Performance comparison of the PALSAR and PALSAR-2 instrumentation


Figure 46: Outside view of the HPA (left) and its inside BBM (image credit: JAXA)


Figure 47: TRM architecture of the L-band SAR instrument (image credit: JAXA)

The image quality with chirp modulation: To distinguish each pulse, PALSAR-2 implements the chirp modulation.

- Up/down and phase modulation in each pulse

- PALSAR is only Down chirp.


Figure 48: Schematic view of up/down chirp modulation in PALSAR-2 (image credit: JAXA)

Chirp signal management: In order to reduce range ambiguities, the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 system has an ability to send up/down chirp signals alternatively.

Data compression algorithm: The maximum data rate (800 Mbit/s) of PALSAR-2 is much higher than that of PALSAR (240 Mbit/s max) due to the improved performances of the SAR instrument providing higher resolution data and a wide swath. To realize the frequent observations and data acquisitions, it is necessary to develop a new data compression technique on board with a highly efficient and a low error rate.

The data compression technique for PALSAR-2 is BAQ (Block Adaptive Quantization) or an improved BAQ version, namely DS-BAQ (Down-Sampling BAQ selectable. The BAQ technique, used for other SAR satellite like TerraSAR-X and COSMO-SkyMed, is the conventional technique. DS-BAQ is the new data compression technique. At conventional radar system, the A/D sampling frequency is wider than the transmitting bandwidth to decrease the ambiguity level. In DS-BAQ, the differential bandwidth between transmitting bandwidth and A/D sampling frequency is cut before BAQ processing (Ref. 50).

Figures 49 and 50 show the simulation results amplitude and phase error analysis, respectively. According to these Figures, DS-BAQ is able to decrease the error more than the BAQ technique in same compression ratio.


Figure 49: The result of amplitude error analysis between BAQ and DS-BAQ (image credit: JAXA)


Figure 50: The result of phase error analysis between BAQ and DS-BAQ (image credit: JAXA)

The error analysis result based on a simulation comparing the two compression algorithms under several polarization modes shows that, in the same data compression ratio, down-sampling BAQ satisfies the lower errors of both amplitude and phase better than BAQ. The compression ratio was evaluated on the BBM (Breadboard Model) of the data compression module, confirming also its processing speed.

The implementation of the data compression algorithm is such that a compression mode is onboard selectable between the DS-BAQ, the original BAQ, and direct output without data compression.


Figure 51: Schematic view of the down-sampling BAC algorithm (image credit: JAXA)


Figure 52: Overview of ALOS-2 implementation phases (image credit: JAXA, Ref. 4)


CIRC (Compact Infrared Camera):

CIRC is an infrared demonstration instrument of JAXA with state-of-the-art COTS (Commercial-off-the-Shelf) technology developed at MELCO (Mitsubishi Electric Corporation). The camera is equipped with an uncooled infrared array detector (microbolometer). The main objective of CIRC is to provide infrared imagery for wildfire detection. CIRC is mounted onto the spacecraft pointing to the right of the flight path at an off-nadir angle of 30º (Figure 53). CIRC is a small size instrument with a mass of ~ 3 kg. 59) 60) 61) 62)

Wildfires are one of the major and chronic disasters affecting many countries in the Asia-Pacific region, and indications are that this will get worse with global warming and climate change. Wildfire detection is one of the main goals in the Sentinel Asia project and to share this information in near real-time across the Asia-Pacific region.

The goal is to realize frequent observations by loading CIRC devices in as many satellites as possible by taking advantage of there small size, low weight, and low power consumption. Other mission targets of the CIRC are volcanoes or heat island phenomena in a city.

JAXA developed two CIRC instruments, one will be launched aboard the ALOS-2 spacecraft; the second one will be launched in 2015 onboard CALET (CALorimetric Electron Telescope), which was installed in the JEM -EF (Japanese Experiment Module) on the ISS (International Space Station) in April 2015.


Figure 53: Schematic view of ALOS-2 and the mounting location of CIRC (image credit: JAXA)

The baseline specifications of the CIRC instrument are listed in Table 12. The detector has a large format (640 x 480 pixels) to capture a wide field of view. Spatial resolution is an important factor for wildfire detection; it is 200 m from an altitude of 600 km (ALOS-2) and 130 m from an altitude of 400 km (CALET). Eliminating the cooling system reduces the size (110 mm x 180 mm x 230 mm) and the consumption power (<20 W) for CIRC.

Instrument mass, size

3 kg, 180 mm x 110 mm x 230 mm

Spectral range

8-12 µm

Spatial resolution

< 200 m @ 600 km altitude (corresponding to < 0.33 mrad)

Detector, Number of pixels

Uncooled infrared detector, 640 x 480

FOV (Field of View)

12º x 9º (128 km x 96 km)

Exposure time

33 ms

Dynamic range

180 K - 400 K

NEDT (Noise Equivalent Differential Temperature)

0.2 K@300 K

Temeprature accuuracy

<4 k (goal 2 K @ 300 K)

Table 12: Baseline specifications of CIRC

Microbolometer: The project adopted microbolometers as an infrared FPA (Focal Plane Array) of the CIRC device. Microbolometers are based on the principle of detecting infrared energy as minute changes of the IR absorber temperature when infrared radiation id detected. Their advantage is that they do not require a cooling system, such as a mechanical cooler. Sensors without a detector cooling system can be made to have a small size, low mass and low power consumption.

CIRC features a SOI (Silicon-on-Insulator) diode uncooled IR FPA developed by MELCO. Its pixel size is 25 µm square. The SOI diode uncooled IR FPA uses a single-crystal silicon pn-junction diode as a temperature sensor. The single-crystal sensor based on silicon LSI (Large-Scale Integration) technology gives it a low-noise characteristic. The NEDT (Noise Equivalent Differential Temperature) is 40 mK with f/1 optics. The drive and readout circuits are almost the same as those of the commercial IR camera. For the space application, the project performed a radiation damage test, and a screening of commercial devices.

Athermal optics: CIRC employs f/1.2 refractive optics with a focal length of 78 mm. The orbital temperature change of the optics will cause a defocus because the refractive indices of the lens materials are highly dependent on temperature. To compensate for this defocus, the project may employ a focus mechanism or a heater to keep the optics' temperature constant. However, such mechanisms increase the instrument resources. An athermal optics can compensate for the defocus due to the temperature change without such mechanisms. CIRC can operate in a temperature range from -15º to 50ºC while maintaining its performance. Figure shows the optical design of CIRC. The athermal optics of the CIRC compensates for the defocus by a combination of different lens materials and diffractive lenses. The CIRC optics uses a germanium and a chalcogenide glass (GASIR). The MTF and athermal characteristics of the CIRC device have been verified in laboratory tests.


Figure 54: Block diagram of the CIRC instrument (image credit: JAXA)


Figure 55: Optical design of CIRC (image credit: JAXA)

Shutterless system: The project eliminated the mechanical shutter from the CIRC for downsizing reasons. A mechanical shutter is more commonly used as a calibration source. Therefore, a way was devised to achieve temperature calibration and straylight correction from the inside the CIRC device. The project obtained images of various temperature blackbody with different CIRC temperatures in order to perform stray-light correction by temperature of the CIRC device.


Figure 56: Photo of the CIRC PFM (Proto Flight Model) for the ALOS-2 mission (image credit: JAXA)

Airborne observations with the CIRC GTM (Ground Test Model): The project carried out airborne observations with the GTM) of CIRC. The model was constructed for establishing a way to perform ground calibration and carry out field observations before fabrication of the PFM.

Observational flight were carried out on March, 22 and 28, 2012. The aircraft was a "Cessna172 Sky hawk". The observation area was Tsukuba City, Tsuchiura City in the south of Ibaraki Prefecture, and Narita City in Chiba Prefecture, all in Japan. The flight altitude ranged from 300 m to 750 m. The GSD (Ground Sample Distance) at these altitudes ranged from 10 cm to 25 cm. The flights confirmed that the performance of the CIRC is as expected and sufficient for launch on ALOS-2.


SPAISE2 (SPace based Automatic Identification SystemExperiment 2)

SPAISE2 is a second generation AIS instrument of JAXA featuring: 63)

• A 4 channel AIS signal reception capability (simultaneously 2 channels)

• Digital sampling and ground signal processing archtecture.

Main sensor

Cross dipole antenna

Channel frequencies

AIS #1: 161.975 MHz, AIS #2: 162.025 MHz
AIS #3: 156.775 MHz, AIS #4: 156.825 MHz

Minimum receiver sensitivity:

-112 dBm

Sampling rate

76.8 kHz

Instrument mass, size

7 kg x 2, 1050 mm x 800 mm x 800 mm

Table 13: Parameters of the SPAISE2 instrument


Figure 57: Schematic view of the AIS system (image credit: JAXA)



Ground system:

An overview of the CIRC ground system is shown in Figure 58. The ACGS (ALOS-2/CIRC Ground System) consists of three components: a CIRC observation planning system, a data processing system, and a data archive system.


Figure 58: Overview of ACGS (ALOS-2/CIRC Ground System), image credit: JAXA (Ref. 61)

Generally, observation plans are constructed in response to requests from users by the CIRC observation planning system, utilizing satellite operation information. After observation, the data processing system obtains Level-0 data from the ALOS-2 ground system and performs geometric and radiometric correction to produce Level-1 data. Then, the detection of wildfires, for example, is conducted to produce Level-2 data. Subsequently, the Level-1 and Level-2 data are released online through the data archive system, making them available to the users.

ALOS-2 ground system:

The ALOS-2 ground system is composed of the Satellite Control and Mission Operation System and the Information System, located at the JAXA Tsukuba Space Center. The Information System will have the functions of data processing, archiving, cataloging and user service functions for ALOS and ALOS-2.

For the global observation, the ALOS-2 ground system will utilize data relay communication and very fast X-band direct downlink (Figure 59). The observation data of PALSAR-2 will be once recorded on the solid state recorder onboard ALOS-2 and reproduced at 278 Mbit/s for Ka-band and at 800/400/200 Mbit/s via X-band.


Figure 59: The ALOS-2 ground system and tracking network (image credit: JAXA, Ref. 57)

When a disaster occurs, command will be ready within 60 minutes for emergency observation. After the Ground station receives the observation data, the emergency product will be ready within 60 minutes. Figure 60 shows the example of quick tasking and processing in natural disaster occurrence.


Figure 60: Example of quick tasking and processing in a natural disaster event (image credit: JAXA)


ALOS-2 science capabilities include global environmental monitoring using the time-series PALSAR-2. The research target also covers biospheric, cryospheric, and coastal ocean research as well as disaster mitigation. Table 14 summarizes these research products. 64)





25-m spaced annual global mosaics (using orthorectified slope corrected SAR)

Produced using the DEM (DSM). Global browse, 500 m global browse mosaic, global 3 m resolution mosaic, and ScanSAR ortho-slope corrected path for quasi-deforestation monitoring of pantropical regions, i.e., Brazil, Indonesia, are also included.

Forest and wetland monitoring

Generate global forest maps, i.e., forest/non-forest or forest maps with more classes and also wetland change maps.

Biomass estimation

Experimentally creates a biomass map using the gamma-naught-biomass, biomass-lidar, and biomass-classification methods

Land use classification

Creates the LULUCF map at several test sites


Crop monitoring using the SAR



DinSAR and time-series analysis, surface deformations caused by earthquakes, volcanic activities, subsidence, and landslides, such as quick deformation patterns of earthquakes and annual monitoring of the Japan islands

Soil moisture

Soil moisture will be generated from PolSAR data.

DEM (Digital Elevation Model)

To be generated by stacking, correction of topographic and ionospheric error is an issue


Sea ice identification

Creates monthly ScanSAR mosaics for both polar regions and temporal changes for glacier movement.


Wind speed distribution

LMOD (L-band modulation function) developed for PALSAR will be improved by using the dual-polarized PALSAR-2.


Sensitivity research for disasters

Time-series SAR data (amplitude), PolSAR and InSAR (coherence) will be combined to detect the best combination for each disaster. Flooding in urban areas is one target.

Fire scar

Using time-differentiation of the slope-corrected HV, fire risk areas will be detected.

Table 14: List of geophysical products


1) Shinichi Suzuki, Yuji Osawa, Yasushi Hatooka, Tomohiro Watanabe, "The Post-ALOS program," Proceedings of the 27th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science) , Tsukuba, Japan, July 5-12, 2009, paper: 2009-n-02

2) Masanobu Shimada, "Advanced Land Observation Satellite (ALOS) and its follow-on satellite, ALOS-2," Proceedings of the 4th International POLinSAR 2009 Workshop, Jan. 26-30, 2009, ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy, URL:

3) Yukihiro Kankaku, Yuji Osawa, Shinichi Suzuki, Tomohiro Watanabe, "The Overview of the L-band SAR Onboard ALOS-2," Proceedings of PIERS (Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium), Moscow, Russia, August 18-21, 2009, URL:

4) Yoshihisa Arikawa, Yuji Osawa, Yasushi Hatooka, Shinichi Suzuki, Yukihiro Kankaku, "Development Status of Japanese Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2," Proceedings of the SPIE Remote Sensing Conference, Toulouse, France, Vol. 7826, Sept. 20-23, 2010, 'Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XIV,' edited by Roland Meynart, Steven P. Neeck, Haruhisa Shimoda, doi: 10.1117/12.866675


6) ALOS-2:The Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 "DAICHI-2", JAXA brochure, URL:

7) Yukihiro Kankaku, Yuji. Osawa, Yasushi Hatooka, Shinichi Suzuki, "Overview of Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 (ALOS-2)" Proceedings of ISPRS Technical Commission VIII Symposium, Aug. 9-12, 2010, Kyoto, Japan

8) Masanobu Shimada, "Advanced Land Observation satellite (ALOS) and ALOS-2," Leiden, The Netherlands, May 17, 2011

9) "ALOS-2 Project," JAXA/EORC, URL:

10) Takao Akutsu, "JAXA's Contributions to the Climate Change Monitoring," June 7, 2011, URL:

11) Shinichi Suzuki, "Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 "DAICHI-2" (ALOS-2) - Mission talk by team leaders," JAXA, May 2014, URL:

12) Yoshihisa Arikawa, Tomoya Niwa, Hideki Saruwatari, Yasushi Hatooka, Yuji Osawa, "ALOS-2 System Design and PFM Current Status," Proceedings of the 29th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Nagoya-Aichi, Japan, June 2-8, 2013, paper: 2013-n-41

13) Masanobu Shimada, Yukihiro Kankaku, Manabu Watanabe, and Takeshi Motooka, "Current Status of the ALOS-2 / PALSAR-2 and the CALVAL Program," CEOS SAR CALVAL Workshop at ASF (Alaska Flight Facility), Fairbanks, AK, Nov. 7-9, 2011, URL:

14) Shinichi Suzuki, Yuji Osawa, Yasushi Hatooka, Yukihiro Kankaku, Tomohiro Watanabe, "Overview of Japan's advanced land observing satellite-2 mission," Proceedings of SPIE, 'Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XIII,' edited by Roland Meynart, Steven P. Neeck, Haruhisa Shimoda, SPIE Vol. 7474, 2009, 74740Q

15) Kazuya Inaoka, Masashi Shirakura Terumi Sunaga, Masaaki Shimada, Noboru Takata, "Development of an X-band Multi-mode High speed Modulator -Design and Development test Results of Engineering Model," Proceedings of the 28th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Okinawa, Japan, June 5-12, 2011, paper: 2011-j-10

16) Shinichi Suzuki , Yukihiro Kankaku,; Hiroko Imai, Yuji Osawa, "Overview of ALOS-2 and ALOS-3", Proceedings of SPIE,' Earth Observing Missions and Sensors: Development, Implementation, and Characterization II,' Vol. 8528, Kyoto, Japan, October 29, 2012, 852811 (November 9, 2012); doi:10.1117/12.979184

17) Awano Johta, Nakadai Mitsuhiro, Yajima Masanobu, "Study of TT&C Communication System for Next Generation JAXA Satellite,"Proceedings of TTC 2013, 6th International Workshop on Tracking Telemetry and Command Systems for Space Applications, Darmstadt, Germany, Sept. 10-13, 2013

18) Shinichi Suzuki, Yukihiro Kankaku, Yuji Osawa, "ALOS-2 development status and draft acquisition strategy," Proceedings of SPIE Remote Sensing 2012, 'Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites,' Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, Vols. 8531-8539, Sept. 24-27, 2012, paper: 8533-9

19) "DAICHI-2 (ALOS-2) Status and Orbit Calculation," JAXA Press Release, May 24, 2014, URL:

20) Patrick Blau, "Japan's H-IIA Rocket successfully Launches ALOS-2 Radar Satellite," Spaceflight 101. May 24, 2014, URL:

21) "Launch of H-IIA Launch Vehicle No. 24," JAXA, MHI, March 14, 2014, URL:

22) Naoki Okumura, "Launch Schedule in 2014 : ALOS-2," JAXA, The 20th Session of the APRSAF (Asia-Pacific Regional Space Agency Forum), Hanoi, Vietnam, December 3-6, 2013, URL:

23) Toshinori Kuwahara, Kazaya Yoshida, Yuji Sakamoto, Yoshihiro Tomioka, Kazifumi Fukuda, Nobuo Sugimura, Junichi Kurihara, Yukihoro Takahashi, "Space Plug and Play Compatible Earth Observation Payload Instruments," Proceedings of the 9th IAA Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, Berlin, Germany, April 8-12, 2013, Paper: IAA-B9-1502, URL:

24) Toru Yamamoto, Isao Kawano, Takanori Iwata, Yoshihisa Arikawa, Hiroyuki Itoh, Masayuki Yamamoto, Ken Nakajima, "Autonomous Precision Orbit Control of ALOS-2 for Repeat-Pass SAR Interferometry," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium), Melbourne, Australia, July 21-26, 2013

25) Yoshihisa Arikawa, Toru Yamamoto, Yoshinori Kondoh, Kyohei Akiyama, Hiroyuki Itoh, Shinichi Suzuki, "ALOS-2 orbit control and determination," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society) 2014, Québec, Canada, July 13-18, 2014

26) Alan Buis, Ian Hamling, "Study of Complex 2016 Quake May Alter Hazard Models," NASA/JPL, March 23, 2017, URL:

27) Ian J. Hamling, Sigrun Hreinsdóttir, Kate Clark, John Elliott, Cunren Liang, Eric Fielding, Nicola Litchfield, Pilar Villamor, Laura Wallace, Tim J. Wright, Elisabetta D'Anastasio, Stephen Bannister, David Burbidge, Paul Denys, Paula Gentle, Jamie Howarth, Christof Mueller, Neville Palmer, Chris Pearson, William Power, Philip Barnes, David J. A. Barrell, Russ Van Dissen, Robert Langridge, Tim Little, Andrew Nicol, Jarg Pettinga, Julie Rowland, Mark Stirling, "Complex multifault rupture during the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand," Science 23 Mar 2017, eaam7194, DOI: 10.1126/science.aam7194, URL of abstract:

28) "Global Digital Surface Model "ALOS World 3D - 30m" (AW3D30) has been updated with void-filled DSM within 60 deg. of N/S latitudes as Version 1.1.," JAXA/EORC, March 6, 2017, URL:

29) "ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 Observation Results on New Zealand," JAXA/EORC, Nov. 16, 2016, URL:

30) "Release of JICA-JAXA Forest Early Warning System in the Tropics (JJ-FAST)," Nov. 14, 2016, URL:

31) "Data Release of Global Forest/Non-forest Map by DAICHI-2 - Contributing to measures to tackle global warming by understanding forest areas," JAXA Press Release, Jan. 28, 2016, URL:

32) "JICA and JAXA Announce Forest Monitoring System Using ALOS-2 Satellite: Constant monitoring of deforestation throughout the tropics and open data access on the Internet," JICA Press Release, December 15, 2015, URL:

33) "ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 Observation Results of Flooding on the Mississippi River," JAXA/EORC, Jan. 21, 2016, URL:

34) "DAICHI-2 Emergency Observations of Sakurajima Volcano," JAXA Press Release, Aug. 19, 2015, URL:

35) Masanobu Shimada, Manabu Watanabe, Takeshi Motooka, Yukihiro Kankaku, Shinichi Suzuki, "Calibration and validation of the PALSAR-2)," Proceedings of the IGARSS (International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium) 2015, Milan, Italy, July 26-31, 2015

36) "Emergency observation and initial GLOF assessment of glacial lakes in western Bhutan by ALOS-2," JAXA/EORC, July 2015, URL:

37) "Agreement concluded with MLIT on DAICHI-2 observation data," JAXA, May 14, 2015, URL:

38) "ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 Observation Results of the 2015 Nepal Earthquake (4)," JAXA, URL:

39) "ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 Observation Results of the 2015 Nepal Earthquake (1)," JAXA, May 5, 2015, URL:

40) "ALOS-2/CIRC data is open to public!," JAXA, Jan. 23, 2015, URL:

41) Masanobu Shimada, "ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 Mission Status," POLinSAR 2015, ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy, Jan. 26-30, 2015, URL:

42) "Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 "DAICHI-2" (ALOS-2) Regular Provision of Observation Data," JAXA Press Release, Nov. 25, 2014, URL:

43) "Provision of Emergency Data on Mt. Ontake Observed by Daichi-2," JAXA Press Release, Sept. 30, 2014, URL:

44) "First Image Data Acquisition by Compact Infrared Camera (CIRC) onboard DAICHI-2," JAXA, Aug. 11, 2014, URL:

45) "First Image Data Acquisition by DAICHI-2 (ALOS-2)," JAXA Press Release, June 27, 2014, URL:

46) "DAICHI-2 (ALOS-2) Completion of Critical Operation Phase," JAXA, May 27, 2014, URL:

47) "DAICHI-2 (ALOS-2) L-band Synthetic Aperture Rader (PALSAR-2) Antenna Deployment," JAXA Press Release, May 26, 2014, URL:

48) Yoshihisa Arikawa, Hideki Saruwatari,Yasushi Hatooka, Shinichi Suzuki, "ALOS-2 launch and early orbit operation result," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society) 2014, Québec, Canada, July 13-18, 2014

49) Yukihiro Kankaku, Masakazu Sagisaka, Shinichi Suzuki, "PALSAR-2 launch and early orbit status," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society) 2014, Québec, Canada, July 13-18, 2014

50) Yukihiro Kankaku, Yuji Osawa, Shinichi Suzuki, "The current status and brief results of Engineering Model for PALSAR-2 onboard ALOS-2," Proceedings of the 28th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Okinawa, Japan, June 5-12, 2011, paper: 2011-n-18

51) Yukihiro Kankaku, Yuji Osawa, Yasushi Hatooka, Shinichi Suzuki, "The overview of the L-band SAR onboard ALOS-2," ISPRS Technical Commission VIII Symposium in Kyoto, Japan, August 10, 2010

52) Y. Okada, T. Hamasaki , M. Tsuji, M. Iwamoto, K. Hariu, Y. Kankaku, S. Suzuki, Y. Osawa, "Hardware Performance of L-band SAR System Onboard ALOS-2," Proceedings of IGARSS (International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium), Vancouver, Canada, July 24-29, 2011

53) Hiroyuki Inahata, Hiroshi Koyama, "Evolution of SAR Satellite for Agriculture Applications," Proceedings of APRSAF-18 (18th Session of the Asia-Pacific Regional Space Agency Forum), Singapore, Dec. 6-9, 2011

54) Osamu Ochiai, Masanobu Shimada, and the JAXA BOS-2 group, "ALOS-2 status and Acquisition Strategy Update," CEOS SDCG 2, USGS HQ, VA, USA, Sept 13-14, 2012

55) Yukihiro Kankaku, Yuji Osawa, Shinichi Suzuki, "The Developmental Status of PALSAR-2 onboard ALOS-2," Proceedings of the 29th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Nagoya-Aichi, Japan, June 2-8, 2013, paper: 2013-n-42

56) Yukihiro Kankaku, Shinichi Suzuki, Yuji Osawa, "ALOS-2 Mission and Development Status," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium), Melbourne, Australia, July 21-26, 2013

57) Shinichi Suzuki, Yukihiro Kankaku, Masanobu Shimada, "ALOS-2 Acquisition Strategy," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium), Melbourne, Australia, July 21-26, 2013

58) Y.Okada, S. Nakamura, K. Iribe, Y. Yokota, M. Tsuji, M.Tsuchida, K.Hariu, Y.Kankaku, S.Suzuki, Y.Osawa, M.Shimada, "System design of wide swath, high resolution, full polarimetric L-band SAR onboard ALOS-2," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium), Melbourne, Australia, July 21-26, 2013

59) Masataka Naitoh, Haruyoshi Katayama, Masatomo Harada, Ryoko Nakamura, Eri Kato, Yoshio Tange, Ryota Sato , Koji Nakau, "Development of the Compact Infrared Camera (CIRC) for Earth Observation," Proceedings of the ICSO (International Conference on Space Optics), Ajaccio, Corse, France, Oct. 9-12, 2012, paper, ICSO-066, URL:

60) Masatomo Harada, Haruyoshi Katayama, Masataka Naitoh, Masahiro Suganuma, Ryoko Nakamura, Yoshio Tange, Takao Sato, "Development of the Compact Infrared Camera (CIRC) for Earth Observation," ICSO 2010 (International Conference on Space Optics), Rhodes Island, Greece, Oct. 4-8, 2010, URL:

61) Masataka Naitoh, Haruyoshi Katayama, Masatomo Harada, Ryoko Nakamura, Eri Kato, Yoshio Tange, Ryota Sato, Koji Nakau, "Compact Infrared Camera (CIRC) for Earth Observation," Proceedings of the 29th ISTS (International Symposium on Space Technology and Science), Nagoya-Aichi, Japan, June 2-8, 2013, paper: 2013-n-29

62) Yusuke Murakia, Koji Nakau, Yohei Sugimoto, "New Concept of International Satellite Constallation of Compact Thermal Infrared Camera," Proceedings of the 67th IAC (International Astronautical Congress), Guadalajara, Mexico, Sept. 26-30, 2016, paper: AC-16-B1.1.10

63) Keizo Nakagawa, "R&D of JAXA Satellite Application Mission," MEWS26 (26th Microelectronics Workshop), Tsukuba, Japan, Oct. 24-25, 2013, URL:

64) Masanobu Shimada, "ALOS-2 Science Program," Proceedings of IGARSS (IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium), Melbourne, Australia, July 21-26, 2013

The information compiled and edited in this article was provided by Herbert J. Kramer from his documentation of: "Observation of the Earth and Its Environment: Survey of Missions and Sensors" (Springer Verlag) as well as many other sources after the publication of the 4th edition in 2002. - Comments and corrections to this article are always welcome for further updates (

Spacecraft    Launch    Mission Status    Sensor Complement    Ground Segment    References    Back to top