Alphasat I / Inmarsat-XL (Inmarsat-Extended L-band Payload) / InmarSat-4A F4
Alphasat is a mobile communications service spacecraft in GEO of Inmarsat Plc. of London, UK, referred to as Inmarsat 1-XL. It uses the first next-generation European Alphabus platform and carries in addition to the commercial Inmarsat payloads four hosted TDPs (Technology Demonstration Payloads) of ESA (European Space Agency). The Alphabus/Alphasat project is covered by the ARTES-8 (Advanced Research in Telecommunications Systems) European program. The four hosted payloads on Alphasat I are: 1)
• TDP1: An advanced LCT (Laser Communication Terminal) representing a further development of already existing flight hardware on TerraSAR-X, NFIRE and TanDEM-X. The objective is to demonstrate GEO-LEO ISLs (Intersatellite Links) of high data rate transmissions (optical link at 1064 nm, 1.8 Gbit/s user data rate), complemented with a Ka-band payload developed by Tesat Spacecom (Germany). The payload is funded by DLR.
• TDP5: Two experimental Q/V-band communications transponders to assess the feasibility of these bands for future commercial applications - developed by TAS-I and Space Engineering, Italy.
• TDP6: Demonstration of an advanced Star Tracker with active pixel detector - developed by Jenoptik of Germany.
• TDP8: Demonstration of an environment effects facility to monitor the GEO radiation environment and its effects on electronic components and sensors - developed by Effacec (Portugal).
In November 2007, ESA, Inmarsat Global Ltd. and their prime industry partner (EADS Astrium) signed a contract for the development of the Alphasat spacecraft to augment Inmarsat's BGAN (Broadband Global Area Network) service. The contract inaugurated the first major European PPP (Public-Private-Partnership) program initiative. An important goal of this contract with the commercial communications operator is to allow an early flight demonstration and in-orbit validation of the Alphabus, the new European high-power telecommunications platform. 2)
Already in March 2006, ESA and CNES (Space Agency of France) signed a cooperation agreement for the development of Alphabus, Europe's next generation platform for telecommunication satellites. The agreement followed the signing of a contract in June 2005 between ESA, CNES, EADS Astrium and TAS (Thales Alenia Space), former Alcatel Alenia Space, who jointly committed to the Alphabus development program. 3)
The original ESA/CNES preparatory program for the Alphabus was approved by the ESA Member States at the Ministerial Council meeting in Edinburgh in November 2001. Subsequently, in 2003 an industrial and commercial agreement was signed between EADS Astrium and Alcatel Space (now Thales Alenia Space) for a joint Alphabus product line covering 12-18 KW payload power. The current contract, for the design of the product line and production of a first Proto Flight Alphabus, was signed as a four party undertaking in June 2005 with a joint ESA and CNES customer team and the co-prime contractors EADS Astrium and Thales Alenia Space (Ref. 6).
• Develop and qualify, together with CNES (Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales) and industry, a generic product line for Alphabus based on ground qualification of development and engineering models.
• Procure a flight-standard platform (protoflight model) to facilitate early first flight opportunity (in the frame of Alphasat).
• Consolidate a Large Platform Mission combining ESA-funded payloads with institutional and/or commercial payloads, allowing the in-orbit demonstration of a protoflight large platform.
Figure 1: Illustration of communications links with Alphasat I-XL (image credit: ESA, TAS)
The Alphasat satellite utilizes the protoflight model of the Alphabus platform, developed by the co-prime contractors Airbus Defence and Space (formerly EADS Astrium) and TAS (Thales Alenia Space). The Alphabus extends the European Industry potential of its telecommunication satellite range significantly, beyond the capabilities of the existing platforms, such as Eurostar 3000 and Spacebus 4000, both with respect to maximum payload power and mass. The Alphabus contract covers the development, and qualification of a complete product line, with the following nominal capability requirements: 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12)
- Spacecraft design life: 15 years
- Payload power: 12-18 kW (conditioned power)
- Spacecraft mass: Up to 8100 kg at launch (Alphasat-I has a launch mass of 6650 kg)
- Payload mass: Up to 1200 kg
Typical communication payload capacity: up to 200 transponders, equivalent to more than 1000 TV channels, SDTV (Standard Definition Television) and more than 200,000 audio channels.
The Alphabus product line is designed for future growth and will be compatible in its extended version with higher payload power (up to 22 kW), higher payload dissipation and a higher payload mass (up to 1400 kg).
The basic design features of the Alphabus are:
• Structure: Central tube and additional carbon and aluminum panels:
- Section 2800 mm x 2490 mm
- Launcher Interface: 1666 mm
• Chemical propulsion:
- 500 N apogee engine and 16 10 N RCTs (Reaction Control Thrusters)
- 2 propellant tanks (max 4200 kg of bi-propellant)
- Helium tanks (2 x 150 liter)
• Electrical propulsion:
- Xenon tanks (max 350 kg)
- PPS 1350 thrusters on TOM (Thruster Orientation Mechanisms)
• Power generation and distribution:
- 2 GaAs solar array wings with 4 to 6 panels
- Power supply and power distribution offering both 100 V and 50 V regulated buses
- Modular Li-ion battery
• Modular concept based comprising an Antenna Module for easier antenna accommodation and efficient assembly and test
• ADCS (Attitude Determination and and Orbit Control Subsystem)
- Star and Sun Sensors
- Reaction Wheels
• Data handling through a 1553 bus for payload.
On June 16, 2011, the Alphabus platform was formally accepted for its first satellite, Alphasat I-XL. The platform provides unrivalled payload capacity to operators for commercial satcom missions and services such as fast Internet to remote locations, high-definition and 3D digital TV broadcast, and communication to mobiles. In addition, the high-power platform offers opportunities for Europe's satcom industry and ESA to work together to develop cutting-edge technologies for new services such as air traffic management or security communications. 13)
The first Alphabus satellite, Alphasat I-XL, developed in partnership with European operator Inmarsat, uses the platform’s full potential.
Figure 2: Artist's rendition of the deployed Alphasat I spacecraft (image credit: ESA, Ref. 6)
The Alphabus platform is based on a scalable modular architecture consisting of three modules: SM (Service Module), RM (Repeater Module), and AM (Antenna Module). The design permits parallel integration and tests of the standardized SM, as well as the mission-specific three-floor RM. 14) 15)
The SM is built around a large central tube (1.6 m) embedding two large propellant tanks with a maximum capacity of 4200 kg, and provides the mechanical interface with the launch vehicle for a launch mass of up to 8,800 kg.
The RM itself is split in two halves, allowing parallel integration of the repeater units with an accommodation capacity doubled compared to what is available today. It is mounted on top of the SM.
The use of an ‘ultrastable’ antenna module structure for the Earth-facing side allows the efficient mechanical alignment of the antennas and their accurate pointing towards Earth. It can also include lateral arms to hold large antenna reflectors on the lateral sides of the satellite, if required by the mission. The antenna module structure is under development by RUAG Space (Switzerland).
The overall structure has been developed by Thales Alenia Space Cannes (France). The central tube was developed by EADS Casa (Spain) and is based on state-of-the-art carbon fiber placement technology offering high strength and low mass.
Figure 3: Photo of the Alphabus service module (right) and Alphasat repeater module stand side by side before the mating procedure at Astrium SAS (image credit: Astrium)
SM (Service Module): The SM is the core unit of the Alphabus development, subject to the common ESA-CNES phase C/D contract. Its development followed a classical approach with a design and validation phase, concluded by a qualification at units, functional chains, then at system levels. It took into account the specificities of a product line with the need to cover a large performances domain. Furthermore, some provisions for future extension capabilities were introduced since the beginning (e.g. the option of including several deployable radiators).
The Alphabus Service Module consists of the main structure, the central tube, internal deck and several other structural elements equipped with thermal hardware, the chemical propulsion system with the main apogee boost motor, the pressure control assembly with three Helium tanks and the two large propellant tanks inside the central tube, as well as part of the plasma propulsion system with, in particular, the Xenon tanks. 16) 17)
Figure 4: Allocation of Service Module element manufacturing to European companies (image credit: CNES)
Figure 5: Photo of the Alphabus Service Module (image credit: TAS, ESA)
Electrical propulsion: The
electrical propulsion subsystem is based on four plasma thrusters used
for north/south on-orbit stationkeeping of the satellite. The system is
an evolution of an existing design (heritage of SMART-1 mission of ESA,
launch Sept. 27 2003) and consists of proven hardware with flight
heritage. The plasma thruster, PPS 1350-G, was developed by Snecma
(France), and its control electronics PPU (Power Processing Unit), come
from Thales Alenia Space ETCA (Belgium).
Figure 6: Illustration of the PPS 1350-G thruster (image credit: Snecma)
Chemical propulsion: The
Alphabus CPS (Chemical Propulsion System) is a helium-pressurized
bipropellant system using monomethylhydrazine (MMH) as the fuel and
mixed oxides of nitrogen (MON-3) as the oxidizer. It has a 4200 kg
total propellant mass capacity scalable down to 3500 kg, with 16
reaction control thrusters and a 400 N apogee engine. EADS Astrium
Lampoldshausen (Germany) is responsible for the CPS subsystem and
provides the reaction control thrusters and apogee engine along with
most CPS components. A new high-efficiency 500 N apogee engine is being
developed at EADS Astrium Lampoldshausen.
ADCS (Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem): The very accurate and flexible ADCS of Alphabus is inherited from the zero-momentum, four-reaction-wheel control concept of the Spacebus® 4000, with three-axis determination using a star tracker and an accurate on-board orbit propagator and precise on-board time. It also includes a gyroscope and a coarse sun sensor. The reaction wheel has been developed by RCD (Rockwell Collins Deutschland GmbH of Heidelberg, formerly known as TELDIX GmbH) in different versions (angular momenta of 18, 25 and 50 Nms); a new active pixel sensor-based star sensor was developed by Galileo Avionica (Italy); a new Hemispherical Resonator Gyroscope was developed by Sagem (France) with Syderal (Switzerland) and a new coarse sun sensor was developed by TNO TPD (Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Delft, The Netherlands).
ATS (Antenna Tracking System): ATS is being used for high-accuracy antenna pointing. ATS is based on radio-frequency sensing in order to reach 0.05º half-cone target performance. Up to eight antennas can be controlled by the ATS. This system allows for individual pointing control of each antenna, compared to the standard ADCS body control, hence compensating for each beam-specific error with a higher control bandwidth. An onboard closed loop is implemented in the onboard software.
Solar panels: The solar generator, inherited from Eurostar E3000, is scalable from four to six panels per wing. The 10 m2
panels are fitted with triple junction solar cells from Azur Space
(Germany) and will benefit from the continuous efficiency improvements
of gallium arsenide (GaAs) cell technology. When needed, the fifth and
sixth panels are deployed laterally from the third in-line panel.
EPS (Electrical Power Subsystem): The overall electrical configuration has been designed to allow efficient powering of payload units. A primary 100 V regulated power bus with structure return is distributed to payload units with aluminum bus bars protected through decentralized fuse boxes. The 100 V PSR (Power Supply Regulator) and the lithium-ion modular battery configuration allows for efficient power regulation. The PSR was developed by EADS Astrium SAS (France). The battery modules and their latest generation ‘G5’ lithium-ion battery cells were developed by Saft (France) for Alphabus. The fuse box was developed by EADS Astrium Crisa (Spain). 18) 19)
The core element of EPS is based on a high Power Supply Regulator named PSR100V, designed by Astrium. A 100V regulated bus has been selected for Alphabus as the more suitable at system level for very high-power satellites for telecom missions. The PSR100V is in charge of powering the spacecraft from solar array panels in sunlight mode and from 1 or 2 batteries during eclipses.
The PSR100V, or PCU (Power Conditioning Unit), is based on a modular approach and of Astrium's Eurostar heritage. Its internal architecture is designed to comply with the reliability target with a single unit per spacecraft. A set of PMs (Power Modules) connected in parallel allows the PSR to convert the onboard available energy into a 100 V regulated power bus. To fulfil this mission, two functions are implemented in a power module:
• The ASR (Array Switch Regulator) that converts the energy of the solar arrays in sunlight mode.
• The BDR (Battery Discharge Regulator) that converts the energy of the battery in eclipse mode.
Figure 7: The PSR100V unit with 10 PMs and 2 SBVRs (image credit: Astrium SAS)
The CM (Central Module) that embeds:
• The TM/TC (Telemetry and Telecommand) interfaces and communication link with spacecraft computer through 1553B protocol
• The control functions for start up, bus voltage regulation and battery charge management
• The centralized 100 V bus capacitor tank.
The PSR100V can embed as an option one or two SBVR (Second Bus Voltage Regulator), each delivering an autonomous and reliable 50 V @ 700 W power bus. This option allows the user to preserve compatibility with existing platform units.
Figure 8: Functional block diagram of PSR100V (image credit: Astrium SAS)
The SBVR (Second Bus Voltage Regulator) has been developed and qualified on ESA's Alphabus program in order to supply existing 50 V platform units. So it has been designed with the same reliability and FMECA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) constraints as the one applied to the 100 V bus generation.
The SBVR is an autonomous function connected internally to the 100 V bus with the same mechanical modularity concept as PM. One or two SBVR modules can be added, limiting the NR (Non-recurring) cost effort to internal power bus bar adaption. The topology choice makes it possible to regulate down to 28V with minor adaptation.
The SBVR is a fault tolerant power supply based on two step-down DC/DC converters operated in hot redundancy. Each DC/DC converter is implemented on a different module, in order to prevent any failure propagation from one channel to the other. A reliable output capacitor bank based on self healing capacitors provides a very low output noise and impedance.
Table 1: Performance characteristics of the PSR100V (or PCU)
The design of the EPS is capable of providing a large power range to match foreseeable future payloads. It provides as an option one or two reliable 50 V secondary buses to keep compatibility with existing platform units.
Figure 9: EPS TM/TC block diagram (image credit: Astrium SAS)
Figure 10: Photo of Alphasat after the mechanical test campaign in August 2011 (image credit: ESA)
The satellite mechanical test campaign has qualified the Alphabus platform for an Ariane 5 launch. The test campaign was completed in August 2011.
Table 2: Alphasat I-XL key performance parameters
Figure 12: Photo of the Alphasat being lowered onto the Arianespace flight adapter in Kourou (image credit: ESA) 22)
Figure 13: Participating States in Alphasat and Alphabus in the complex PPS (Public Private Partnership) program (image credit: ESA, Ref. 11)
Launch: The Alphasat I/Inmarsat 1-XL/Inmarsat-4A F4 spacecraft (6650 kg) was launched on July 25, 2013 on an Ariane-5 ECA vehicle from Kourou. The Ariane-5 ECA vehicle took off at 19:54 GMT and delivered Alphasat into the target GTO (Geostationary Transfer Orbit about 28 minutes later. - Alphasat’s signal has been picked up by an Inmarsat ground station in Beijing as expected at 20:38 GMT, confirming that the satellite is at the predicted location, powered up and transmitting. 23) 24)
Passenger payload: INSAT-3D, a geostationary weather satellite of ISRO with a mass of ~ 2100 kg, was the passenger payload on this flight.
Orbit: GEO (Geostationary Orbit), altitude ~35,756 km, longitude = 25º E.
Mission status and in-flight experience:
• February 20, 2020: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA-ASI) of San Diego has successfully ground tested its Airborne Laser Communication System (ALCoS) by establishing a link with a satellite in Geo-synchronous Earth Orbit (GEO). GA-ASI conducted the test with Tesat-Spacecom (TESAT), the leader of space-based laser communication (lasercom), using their GEO Laser Communication Terminal (LCT), the LCT 135 of Alphasat. This was the first demonstration of an air-to-space lasercom system with Size, Weight and Power (SWAP) that is compatible with a Medium-altitude, Long-endurance (MALE) Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA). 25)
- GA-ASI tested the ALCoS from an optical observatory located on Tenerife in the Canary Islands and closed link with TESAT’s LCT 135 terminal onboard the GEO satellite Alphasat. The test successfully demonstrated acquisition and tracking, and sufficient power to close the link with the LCT 135. GA-ASI is completing the development of the flight system for use on a GA-ASI-produced MQ-9 RPA.
- “This test was a critical step towards enabling our aircraft with a high-bandwidth communication system that cannot be jammed or detected by an adversary,” said Linden Blue, CEO, GA-ASI. “ALCoS allows a new generation of high-performance sensors by breaking the data bottleneck of current RF SATCOM technology.”
- ALCoS is the result of a five-year, GA-ASI-funded effort to deliver Low Probability of Intercept (LPI), Low Probability of Detect (LPD) communications link to the MQ-9. With 300 times the data carrying capacity of conventional RF SATCOM systems, ALCoS will be able to operate as a gateway to the Joint Aerial Network for forward-deployed forces.
- The system has the capability to work in two optical wavelengths, 1064 nm and 1550 nm. TESAT brings more than 12 years of experience with deployed lasercom systems for space. TESAT’s LCT 135 terminals are currently in use on seven satellites in orbit. These LCTs make over 60 satellite-to-satellite links over a distance of 45,000 km per day and have logged over 30,000 links total. TESAT has proven the commercial viability of laser satellite communications.
• December 20, 2016: When Alphasat was launched on 25 July 2013 from the European Spaceport in Kourou, a program of hosted payloads was one of the mission’s objectives. The initial three-year in-orbit demonstration period having been completed, ESA and Inmarsat, the satellite operator, together with the hosted payload providers will kick off an extension of the program on 1 January 2017 for another three years, covering the period 2017-2019. 26)
- Alphasat, Europe’s largest telecom satellite to date, was developed in a Public Private Partnership between ESA and Inmarsat. The mission’s primary purpose was to complement Inmarsat’s existing satellite fleet. Located at 25º East, Alphasat’s L-band payload provides Inmarsat with extra commercial capacity and additional services over Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The program included the development of highly innovative payload technologies, such as an advanced digital integrated processor allowing flexible allocation of capacity by digital channelization and beamforming.
- Another major goal of the mission was to fly the new high-power satellite platform, called Alphabus, which was developed by Airbus DS and Thales Alenia Space, through a joint initiative between ESA and CNES, the French space agency, undertaken within the frame of the ARTES program. The success of this aspect of the mission demonstrates Europe’s ability to meet the operators' needs in the high-power segment, which represents a growing market in terms of sales.
- In addition to this, approximately 20% of the spacecraft’s resources were dedicated to four hosted payloads, also called TDPs (Technology Demonstration Payloads), which were provided by ESA. In agreement with Inmarsat, these payloads will continue to be in operation during the coming three years.
- Laser communication and Ka-band downlink: Developed by TESAT Spacecom, with support from DLR(German Aerospace Center), the LCT (Laser Communication Terminal) payload provides LEO to GEO optical communications at up to 1.8 Gbit/s. A Ka-band transmitter then relays the data to a ground station. The Alphasat LCT has established and demonstrated the first LEO to GEO optical link with this advanced technology, opening the path to the EDRS (European Data Relay System). It has been used for testing and demonstration purposes using two Sentinel satellites from the Copernicus Earth Observation constellation, as LEO counterparts. The Sentinels are equipped with on-board laser terminals, similar to the one flying on Alphasat. They have recently started operational services with EDRS.
- During the extension period, the LCT will continue to be used for in-flight characterization of the performance of optical intersatellite communication links. It will also be used to better understand the impact of the atmosphere on laser links to optical ground stations. Using laser links for additional applications, such as communications with RPAs (Remotely Piloted Aircraft) will be further explored.
- Q/V-band communication and propagation: A Q/V-band communication repeater, called the Aldo Paraboni Payload, explores the use of these frequencies for future applications. In parallel, experiments with propagation beacons in Q- and Ka-bands measure the effects of the Earth’s atmosphere on radio waves.
- The Aldo Paraboni Payload flying onboard Alphasat is complemented by three communications ground stations, two in Italy supplied by ASI and one in Austria procured with support from FFG, the Austrian Research Promotion Agency. In addition, the network of beacon reception stations has grown from 3 to 18 and now spans the whole of Europe, demonstrating the success of this mission within the communications research community.
- During the extension period, scientific and communications experiments will continue to be undertaken which will lead to the better understanding of these high frequency bands. These developments will also be relevant for the development of propagation models for future telecommunications satellite Q-, V- and W- band systems and non-geostationary Ka-band systems.
- Star Tracker: An advanced Star Tracker with active pixel detection was included as a hosted payload to gain early flight heritage for this new product. It is capable of very accurate and autonomous attitude acquisition. The sensor is highly resilient to the radiation experienced in geostationary orbits. In-orbit validation of the star tracker has given a tremendous boost to the company’s sales on the world market.
- During the extension period, the long-term health and performance of the star tracker will continue to be monitored by comparing star patterns each geosynchronous day.
- Environmental testing: The Environment Effects Facility payload tests next-generation electronic components (optical transceivers, GaN transistors, and flash memories) in the radiation environment of a geostationary orbit. An energy selective particle spectrometer measures radiation levels in parallel. The end goal of this payload is to gain experience in orbit with these new components, allowing their use in the next generation of spacecraft.
- During the extension period, tests will continue on sensitivity to space radiation. This is particularly important, for instance, to better correlate the real degradation of optical transceivers in space with ground testing in a simulated environment.
- Maximum synergy: “The first three years of operations have shown that ambitious hosted payloads to demonstrate new technologies in flight can be successfully embarked on a commercial spacecraft,” says ESA’s Philippe Sivac, Large Platform Mission program manager. “First seen as a program opportunity, the hosted payloads have become a mission in their own right, each with an active research and development community, taking full benefit of the in-orbit and on-ground infrastructure. We look forward to the next three years of exciting results from our hosted payloads.”
- "The Alphasat set of hosted payloads is a great example of the flexibility of the PPP model, demonstrating that the embarked technology demonstration payloads are also operationally used to the maximum extent possible," says Magali Vaissiere, Director of Telecommunications and Integrated Applications at ESA. "Both the commercial operator as well as ESA and its institutional partners are able to exploit the capabilities of this powerful spacecraft in highly synergistic ways, to the benefit of the space community as a whole."
• May 2016: The four TDPs (Technology Demonstration Payloads) are the hosted payloads on Alphasat. These payloads were provided by several research institutes, with the aim of demonstrating new technologies in an in-orbit setting. To optimize this opportunity, coordination of the different, the possibly conflicting, payload operations was required. To answer this coordination need, a software system, the TECO (TDP ESA Coordination Office) System, was developed. The system is completely automated (i.e., without any human intervention in the nominal case), and it has been designed to keep all the different partners (system and TDP operators) actively in the loop while coordinating and optimizing the different requests. 27)
- The TECO System was designed with the objectives of: (1) creating optimal plans for the hosted payload operations, (2) supporting a distributed planning process, and (3) minimizing the cost of system development as well as operations. This was accomplished by using Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling Technologies. These technologies permit not only to achieve optimal solutions but also to automatically generate explanations of the solving process. In fact, since the system is completely automated, one of the system requirements was to provide the final users with the necessary information to understand the planning process, the analysis of the input requests, and, most of all, the final operation plans. Another consequence of the automated nature of the system is the different role of the TECO System operator: she/he supervises the operations and intervenes only in case of anomalies.
- The TECO System is operational since the end of 2013. To give the readers an idea, in the first three months the system was able to smoothly allocate more than 2000 payload activities without any operator intervention. In general the system allowed to have safe and transparent operations while maximizing the experimental return of the different hosted payloads.
- Characterized by very different experimental plans and goals, and all subject to the general constraints dictated by the Alphasat mission these Technology Demonstration Payloads are:
1) TDP1: a demonstration of the LEO to GEO optical communications link at 1064 nm which will receive observation data from a LEO earth observation spacecraft (Figure 14). The received data is then routed to ground via a Ka band RF link. During nominal operations TDP1 commanding is dependent on the number of links established with the LEO satellites or Optical Ground Station (OGS) per day. Around 15 commands must be sent to establish each link.
2) TDP5 Aldo Paraboni: a payload for Q/V band feasibility experiments. It is composed by a Communication Experiment exploiting the Q/V-band (40-50 GHz) frequency ranges and looking into link performance and Interference / Fading Mitigation Techniques (IFMT), and a Scientific Experiment, obtaining additional Q/V band propagation data. It also comprises a Technology Experiment to assess the performance of the Q/V-band associated hardware.
3) TDP6: an advanced ASTRO APS star tracker intended as a feasibility study and in-orbit verification of the new APS (Active Pixel Sensor). The TDP6 APS star tracker provides TDP1 with attitude data.
4) TDP8: an environmental effects facility designed to monitor the GEO radiation environment and assess the impact of that environment on EEE components.
For each TDP a dedicated operations center (TDP-OC) is responsible for defining the different payload experiments. The spacecraft resources (e.g., power), downlink data, and telemetry budget, and therefore experiment execution, are shared between the TDPs while operational requests are managed at a top level by the TECO (TDP ESA Coordination Office).
• May 2016: TDP1 (Technology Demonstration Payload-1), developed by TESAT for DLR, represented the world’s first available high-speed optical GEO-relay system, consisting of a LCT and the Ka-band RF downlink transmitter with link capability at data rates up to 1.8 Gbit/s. 28)
- Since completion of its in orbit commissioning, TDP1 has used the ESA OGS (Optical Ground Station) on Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain) to characterize the optical link performances and optimize its configuration parameters, while awaiting the launch of a proper companion in orbit for performing its primary inter-satellite optical link demonstration mission.
- Launched on April 3, 2014, Sentinel-1A is the first European satellite contributing to the Copernicus program. Procured and operated by ESA on behalf of the European Commission, it performs its Earth observation mission from its SSO LEO orbit thanks to a Synthetic Aperture Radar. As an additional payload and part of an effort to complement and improve the standard data downlink strategy with an innovative inter-satellite solution, an OPC (Optical Communication Payload), based on a LCT identical to the one on Alphasat has been embarked onboard Sentinel-1A.
- In November 2014, the first optical link between Alphasat and Sentinel-1A was established. Since then, a large number of links have been performed, demonstrating performance and reliability, and validating system budgets in orbit, meeting the requirements of a commercial relay service.
- Alphasat (ASA) and S1A (Sentinel-1A) OISL (Optical Intersatellite Link) Operations: In the most generic case, the execution of an OISL implies an exchange of information and coordination for the preparation and commanding of the link. Figure 15 visualizes this generic operations scenario. Although apparently complex, a clear interface definition between the different actors renders the system operations relatively simple.
- The “Customer” provides the initial Link request to the “LCT Mission Control Center”, and receives the “User Data” (step 1 and 7 respectively). The LCT-MCC, based on the planning inputs received by the Satellites Control Centers (SCC, step 2) compiles the “Ops Requests” and delivers them to the corresponding SCC (step 3). The two satellites’ SCC, independently command the flight segment (and prepare the ground stations) for the execution of the link (step 4). At the defined link execution time, the OISL takes place (step 5), relying the user data acquired at or before the link execution time (step ≤ 5). During the link itself, the data transmitted on the optical inter-satellite segment is downlinked to the involved GS (step 6). Finally, the data are delivered to the “customer” from the GS (step 7).
- For the specific case of ASA and S1A experimental links, the “Customer” shall be replaced by the LCT experiment operations team at TES (TESAT), and the user data are composed of actual scientific data (S1A SAR images) as well as by actual performance parameters acquired by the LCT during the exercise, and a predefined relevant subset of satellite’s Housekeeping parameters.
- TDP1 Operations on board Alphasat: TDP1 is one of four hosted payloads on the Inmarsat operated Alphasat geostationary communication satellite. As such, the concept of operations has to satisfy the basic requirement of non-interference with the main mission (commercial) objective. To achieve this, the integration of TDP1 in the Inmarsat fleet operations work-flow has been pursued and achieved thanks to an automated operations scenario coordinated by the TECO (TDP ESA Coordination Office).
- Joint S1A&ASA OISL Operations: Given the experimental nature of the activities conducted, a joint concept has been agreed for the ASA-S1A Optical Inter-Satellite Links operations, based on the two missions’ planning cycle and operations execution scenario. Figure 16 illustrates the concept and work-flow.
- During the execution of increment N-1, the LCT MCC at GSOC provides the next increment “Slot List”, based on the orbits of the two LCT hosting satellites and the terminals operational constraints (both internal and dictated by the hosting mission). Based on this “Slot List” , the LCT Operations Team at TES selects the interesting opportunities to execute links during increment N, and proposes them to the LSB (Link Selection Board). The LSB discusses the links proposal in the light of the additional dynamic planning constraints reported in the ASA “enhanced-TDPs Activity Planning File” (e-TAPF) made available by the ASA INM satellite control team and by the S1A FOS. The output of the weekly LSB is the Timeline for increment N, that the LCT Operations team and LCT MCC (TES and GSOC) translate into the relevant IOR entries and PPFs for ASA, and SORs for S1A.
- This simple concept has been permitting an effective and easy coordination of the several actors involved in the links planning and execution, while maintaining the needed independence of each mission’s activities. Moreover, thanks to the unique coordination point in the process represented by the LSB, consistent visibility of the on-going activities is provided also to all stake-holders not directly involved with an active role in the OISL operations.
- Link Performance: Alphasat TDP1 GEO-relay has executed up to the present date more than 200 successful links of both quasi-operational and experimental scope.
- During optical link commissioning between Alphasat TDP1 and Sentinel-1A, the total uncertainty cone was initially set to 2250 µrad and reduced to 1000 µrad. During all links, pointing accuracy was found better than 500 µrad for both link partners. Excellent host attitude knowledge is provided by the Jena-Optronik ASTRO APS star sensor embarked on Alphasat as TDP6.
- In parallel to the uncertainty cone, also spatial acquisition duration was reduced from 240 s at the very first tests to 34 s for default links. During dedicated experimental links, spatial acquisition was reliably achieved within 7 s . Even during links with intentionally adverse conditions like ultra-low TX laser power of 100 mW, spatial acquisition was achieved in no more than 80 s. Figure 17 shows the 100th link as a typical example of spatial acquisition within 34 seconds for a link with total uncertainty cone of 1000 µrad, and 1.1 W optical TX power.
Figure 17: ASA-S1A 100th link – TM shows modes transitions, Coarse and Fine Pointing Assembly positions, Point Ahead Angle position, and Spatial and Frequency Acquisition status. For the successful 10 minute link (image credit: TDP1 collaboration)
- Link acquisition between Alphasat TDP1 and Sentinel-1A is reliably and repeatability achieved within less than 50 seconds after T0. During some specific link sessions, acquisition durations of only 20 s have even been demonstrated (Figure 18). No impact on acquisition duration could be found due to satellite-induced microvibrations environment.
Figure 18: Acquisition within 20 s, spatial acquisition 7 s. TM recorded at 100 Hz sampling rate. Only TDP1 is shown (link performed on Aug. 18, 2015), (image credit: TDP1 collaboration, Ref. 28)
• January 19, 2016: A new planning and scheduling system, dubbed TECO (Technology Demonstration Payload – ESA Coordination Office) is making a valuable contribution, saving time and human effort by offering a service that optimizes payload activity scheduling. The new planning and scheduling system was originally developed for ESA’s Telecommunication and Integrated Application programs by engineers at ESOC as a prototype for validating AI software. It has now evolved into a proven system that used for Alphasat. 29)
- For the Alphasat hosted TDPs (Technology Demonstration Payloads), TECO accepts proposed activity requests from each of the four payload control centers, applies hundreds of limitations and constraints from each of the four devices, as well as from the satellite platform and its prime payload mission, and then crunches the numbers to produce a detailed weekly payload activity schedule. This typically includes over 100 separate payload actions and, in some cases, more than 500.
- The process is automated, and humans need intervene only if an anomalous conflict is identified that can’t be resolved by the system’s AI engine. “To date, feedback from our customers – the centers that operate the four test payloads on board Alphasat – has been extremely positive,” says Nicola Policella, the lead designer and now TECO service manager. “It’s automated, it saves a great deal of human effort and, most importantly, it reduces the risk of human error while allowing the payload operators to focus on problems that AI and automation alone can’t solve.”
- The satellite provides an ideal test bed for ESA’s four Technology Demonstration Payloads, comprising a star tracker and a laser communication terminal, both developed and built in Germany (by Jena Optronik and Tesat, respectively) with funding from DLR, an extremely high-frequency transponder, provided by Italy’s ASI space agency and industrial partners Thales Alenia Space and Space Engineering, and a radiation monitor from the Efacec Group, Portugal.
- The TECO scheduling system was developed at ESOC in 2011–12 and entered operation at the end of 2013.
Figure 19: Optimizing payload scheduling with TECO (image credit: ESOC - CC SA-BY 3.0 IGO)
Key TECO results to date according to Nicola Policella: 30)
- The first benefit relates to how we use advanced planning and scheduling approaches enable us to suggest and introduce a change in the originally intended planning cycle. In fact, the initial cycle did not foresee any iterations between TECO and the external TDP partners, being limited instead to a single exchange of planning product inputs and outputs. Due to the short solving time, the TECO system is capable of providing timely feedback to the external partners in case of conflicts between requests, thus allowing them to resubmit their planning inputs in an iterative way.
- Another benefit: modelling of the solution includes information about why a task may have not been allocated. In fact, there are many different reasons for why a task might not be allocated; for example, invalid input files, ill-defined task requests, tasks conflicting with spacecraft status, tasks conflicting with other task requests or tasks not allocated because they are linked to conflicting tasks. It is worth remarking that a proper explanation is fundamental to achieve effective iterations among the different actors involved (i.e. TECO and the payload owners).
- A fundamental design decision was to have a flexible system architecture, which allowed the operators to cope with several changes introduced during the definition of the problem as well as during the actual operational phase. This aspect was crucial to coping with the evolution of the requirements during the various phases of the project.
• On 14 July 2015, the two laser communication terminals onboard both the Alphasat satellite and the Sentinel-1A Earth observation satellite established their 100th optical intersatellite link since the start of the demonstration process in November 2014. At the time of the link, Sentinel-1A was passing over Antarctica while Alphasat was at its geostationary position 35,786 km above Central Africa. Communication was established in less than 50 seconds and the satellites tracked each other for a total of 10 minutes. The ultra-fast optical connection was used to transmit SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) data from Sentinel-1A to the Ka-band ground station, located in Oberpfaffenhofen Germany, using Alphasat as a relay. 31)
- The connection process, consisting of spatial and frequency acquisition, is reliably achieved well within the originally specified timeframe, in some cases taking as little as 19 seconds. After the connection has been established, communication starts and SAR data can be transferred. It has been determined that optical transmission power as low as 1.1W is sufficient to ensure stable and bit-error free links at distances of up to 45,000 km. Performance has exceeded expectations, demonstrating good system margins and great potential for further applications.
- With funding from DLR and ESA, Tesat Spacecom developed the laser communication terminals and downlink system that is used by the two satellites. The terminals are capable of establishing optical communication links at data transmission speeds of up to 1.8 Gbit/s, with a design that could scale up to 7.2 Gbit/s in the future.
Figure 20: Schematic view of the 100th optical communication session (image credit: Tesat Spacecom)
Figure 21: The AlphaSat satellite, with the LCT (Laser Communication Terminal) hosted on its Earth-pointing face (image credit: ESA, Airbus DS)
• June 10, 2015: With Alphasat in full service, Inmarsat announces that the Inmarsat-4 F2 (I-4 F2) communications satellite is being flown to a new orbital position above the Indian Ocean, creating a fourth full-service L-band region to offer enhanced connectivity capacity for customers in the Middle East and Asia (MEAS). 32)
• March 25, 2015: Inmarsat has announced the successful transition of key L-band voice and data services from its I-4 F2 satellite to Alphasat, the telecommunications satellite developed by Inmarsat in partnership with ESA (European Space Agency). 33) 34)
- According to Inmarsat, services including FleetBroadband were transferred overnight during a regular maintenance window. Both satellites will continue to jointly provide services over the EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa) region until the remaining two services (L-TAC and IsatData Pro) still carried out by the I-4 F2 are also transferred to Alphasat. - This is scheduled to happen by the end of Q2 2015, whereupon the I-4 F2 will be flown to a new orbital position to create a fourth L-band region, serving the Middle East and Asia (MEAS). Commercial services, including FleetBroadband, are due to begin operation in this new region by the end of 2015.
• On February 3, 2015 the two ground stations in Tito and Spino d’Adda were connected through Alphasat — providing the first 40/50 GHz satellite video conference. 35)
- The weather conditions were not the optimal ones for satellite links at those frequency: snowing in Tito and raining in Spino d’Adda. The modems were connected to camera in the two stations premises and the video conference took place.
• The end of 2014 marked the first full year in orbit for the four ESA Technology Demonstration Payloads, flying on board Alphasat as hosted payloads. The LCT (Laser Communications Terminal) ,supplied by DLR, was used extensively to demonstrate laser communication links with Sentinel-1A in LEO (Low Earth Orbit). After an initial demonstration in November, the campaign continued with an impressive series of links in December. 36)
• Nov. 28, 2014: First laser link transmission experiments between Alphasat in GEO and Sentinel-1A of ESA in LEO were successfully conducted using the experimental LCT (Laser Communication Terminal -TDP1) of Tesat Spacecom. The demonstration involved the transmission of Sentinel-1A images in near- realtime via Alphasat to ESA/ESOC in Darmstadt, Germany at a link speed of 1.8 Gbit/s. This important step demonstrates the potential of Europe's new space data highway to relay large volumes of data very quickly so that information from Earth-observing missions can be even more readily available. 37)
• Nov. 18, 2014: Hawaiian Airlines (USA) has announced it will be the first commercial airline installing Inmarsat’s (UK) SB (SwiftBroadband-Safety), a new air safety service for trans-oceanic flights that has been designed and developed through ARTES Alphasat, a Private Public Partnership between Inmarsat and ESA. SB-Safety builds on Inmarsat’s SwiftBroadband, the company’s L-band-based satellite communications system for the aviation industry. Developed for use in the flight deck, it provides airlines with cockpit communication, both for operations and air traffic control, everywhere in the world. 38)
• Oct. 2014: Figure 22 shows a typical movement of the in orbit LCTs 2-axis Coarse Pointing gimbal mechanism during an acquisition phase. Prior to start of the link, the 2-axis LCT Coarse Pointing gimbal mechanism was commanded to the initial link position. At the start of the link, Alphasat TDP1 LCT was set as master terminal and performing spiral scans with its laser beam fine pointing mirrors in the direction towards the OGS (Optical Ground Station). This first phase lasted 120 seconds, during which the OGS was manually aligned to the center of the flashing signal. After alignment, the 10 W ground laser was activated towards the TDP1 LCT as phase 2 acquisition started (Ref. 56).
- Now using its acquisition sensors and fine-steering mirrors, the Alphasat LCT aligned its optics to the OGS uplink beam and fulfilled the transition from coarse to fine acquisition. After both link partners were sufficiently aligned to each other, the signal was received by the LCT’s four quadrant coherent detector and the LCT changed from acquisition phase to coherent tracking mode, keeping itself actively aligned onto the incoming laser beam from now on. During the described optical ground links, strong scintillation effects due to atmosphere and clouds were observed, causing deep signal fades. Yet, stable tracking was achieved even at RX intensities of less than 10% of the lowest specified RX intensity during a LEO-GEO link (Figure 23).
Only at much lower tracking sensor levels, when thick clouds interrupted the link, tracking was lost. In this case, the LCT automatically re-started the link acquisition by spiral scanning, resuming tracking as soon as clouds were passed. This was demonstrated for a high number of cycles. — In conclusion, the LCTs algorithms for spatial acquisition based on spiral scanning, the autonomous transition from spacial acquisition to tracking, and tracking under severe atmospheric conditions was demonstrated successfully between Alphasat as a GEO spacecraft and the ESA optical ground station located in Tenerife.
Figure 23: Coherent tracking at GEO-ground RX signal strength (inlay), much below LEO-GEO RX intensity (image credit: Tesat, Ref. 56)
• Competitiveness boost (Aug. 2014): The boost of competitiveness linked to the Alphabus and Alphasat programs can be clearly measured. Alphasat is now a key asset for Inmarsat, and the associated services developed under the ARTES program will benefit the maritime and aeronautical communities. For the satellite primes, some of the technologies developed and validated under Alphabus, such as power or plasmic propulsion, are now also largely incorporated into the subsystems of each of the primes main product lines. At unit level, the sensors, power supplies and digital processors developed under the Alphabus and Alphasat programs have all been actively marketed and sold on various other satellite program (Ref. 11).
- The TDP6 star tracker, for example, has been particularly successful on the commercial market, thanks in part to its qualification and in-orbit demonstration phase on Alphasat. TDP8 is expected to complement this success with its in situ measurement of the radiation environment in the most commercially relevant orbit (geostationary), while the Aldo Paraboni payload and the LCT (Laser Communications Terminal) will both be instrumental in demonstrating new telecommunications technologies in orbit and opening new commercial markets, as indicated by the interest they are triggering in an increasingly large international community.
- At system level, Alphabus is ready to address the upper range of the satellite telecommunications market and complement the existing European product offerings.
- Even though the current Alphabus platform has met its objectives on the ground and in orbit with the mission of Alphasat, an Alphabus Extension Program is running in parallel to further develop the capabilities of the product line. The main features being developed are, among others, additional spacecraft power for payloads up to 22 kW, increased heat rejection capabilities (up to 19 kW) including the addition of a Deployable Panel Radiator, and improved avionics.
• May 2014: Since its launch in late July 2013, Alphasat has demonstrated to be an extremely reliable and kind host for the TDPs. The platform performances have been providing the “best case” scenario for the hosted payloads in terms of environment and constraints. In few occasions, the platform (and its operator) flexibility have actually permitted to fine tune and optimize the operational conditions for the hosted payload on need, after the first in-flight data were obtained and analyzed. 39)
From a ground segment and operations perspective, beyond confirming the expected operability and performances post-launch of the TDPs, the LEOP and IOT experience has brought an increased confidence in the system, and reinforced the (necessary) awareness of having a clear and complete set of roles and responsibilities all covered, each properly assisted by the corresponding needed tools and procedures.
Since the formal entry in the nominal operations phase on January 1, 2014, more than 2000 (2169 as of April 4, 2014) activities for the TDPs have been scheduled, of which 89 in total (4.1%) were aborted. When an initial misconfiguration of the system that lead to the abortion of 78 procedures for is taken into consideration, the abortions figure reduces to 11 (0.5%). It shall be further noted that all the abortions were fully explained and understood, with none of them due to the activities planning or execution systems.
Few un-expected behaviors were observed (fewer than most of the actors involved possibly expected from a new platform, flying 4 technology demonstrators operated by 9 different companies and institutions, and using a new operations concept and system). All of these were successfully addressed by the operations concept and tools described above. The end-to-end system has actually shown the additional benefit of enabling the actors involved to exercise a high level of flexibility in the use of the various interfacing elements to perform operations outside the nominal scenario where convenient.
A special mention shall be made to the NRT monitoring system provided by the I4S. The project was initiated by ESA and Inmarsat as an additional, non-necessary tool for the monitoring and control of the TDPs complementing the use of the UDP TM stream and daily products. In particular (but not only) during the IOT phase, the system has gone well beyond the initial expectations.
As a matter of facts, the architecture of the system, with the very same Inmarsat I4S software team providing support, and no need for compilations of any of the system configuration products (notably the SDB), has proved a major advantage for the provision of a reliable and ubiquitous mean for RT and non-RT monitoring. Giving access in near real time (few seconds delay) to the very same TM stream accessed at the SCC, and in the very same environment, to all users, the execution of critical operations with a distributed supporting team (sometimes necessary in the TDPs experimental scenarios) have been made simpler and safer, if not simply possible at all.
Although not new to the concept of hosted payloads, the peculiar and disparate nature of the Alphasat TDPs (Technology Demonstration Payloads) brought about the need for Inmarsat and ESA to create a suitable operations concept and environment.
• May 9, 2014: The ASTRO APS Star Tracker EQM successfully completed the qualification test campaign. The APS Star Tracker has shown excellent performance. It outreached the specified requirements especially in terms of accuracy and robustness to space environment (Moon, Radiation Robustness). The design expectations are very well met. 40)
- The ASTRO-APS Star Tracker is well suited to fulfil the mission requirements of Alphasat, Small GEO, Sentinel-2 and EarthCARE, missions for which ASTRO-APS us currently contracted for.
• March 2014: Alphasat is in good health and is being routinely operated from Inmarsat’s control center in London. The four Technology Demonstration Payloads were all tested by the end of 2013. 41)
• January 21, 2014: European scientists can now begin probing unexplored frequencies, as mega telecom satellite Alphasat’s ‘Aldo Paraboni Q/V Band’ hosted payload has been given the green light to begin experiments. 42)
- Six months after launch, the payload has undergone many commissioning and in-orbit tests before receiving the go-ahead to start operations. The Q/V-band mission, named after the late Italian scientist Aldo Paraboni who inspired it, is one of four technology demonstration payloads carried by Alphasat. It is dedicated to exploring the higher-frequency Q- and V-bands at 38 and 48 GHz.
- With all tests now complete confirming the payload is healthy and performing well, the scientists can start conducting their experiments. They will be analysing the data from the two independent packages that make up the Aldo Paraboni payload.
• Nov. 20, 2013: Astrium, as prime contractor for Alphasat and responsible for LEOP (Launch and Early Orbit Phase) operations, confirms that the first Alphabus platform is now fully operational. 43)
• Nov. 13, 2013: The LCT (Laser Communication Terminal) of Alphasat correctly identified its target at ESA’s ground station on the island of Tenerife in the Canary Islands for the first time on Nov. 4, 2013, proving that it can be pointed precisely enough to hit a point more than 36 000 km away. 44)
- The ‘illumination test’ involved the terminal beaming its laser from geostationary orbit to hit the ground sensors. It was the final stage of commissioning for this ‘hosted’ payload, and shows it is healthy and ready for the next set of tests: linking with the ground station and exchanging data.
- This technology demonstration payload, dubbed TDP1, is an optical communications and Ka-band downlink system built by German company Tesat Spacecom and furnished by the DLR (German Aerospace Center). It will demonstrate the use of laser technology for collecting information from the congested low orbits and then transmitting it to ground stations from its position high above in geostationary orbit.
• The LEOP (Launch and Early Orbit Phase) and part of the IOT (In-Orbit Test) activities were conducted from the Airbus Defense and Space facilities in Toulouse, with the hand-over to the Inmarsat SCC (Satellites Control Centre) in London on August 12, 2013.
• On August 3, 2013, Alphasat reached a temporary position (slot) in the geostationary orbit. It deployed its 11 m diameter main antenna over the course of a day – marking ten days in orbit and completing one of the final steps towards starting services. The spacecraft will stay in this slot for several weeks while Inmarsat together with ESA continue testing the telecom payload, the backup units on the Alphabus platform and ESA’s four hosted payloads. 45)
- Several major milestones have been met over the past few days, including rising to geostationary altitude after separation from its Ariane 5 launcher, and deploying its twin four-panel solar wings, spanning 40 m. The panels rotate automatically, following the Sun, while Alphasat’s sophisticated attitude control system tracks its position above Earth.
- All of these milestones were assured by a team from Astrium, the Alphasat prime contractor, managed by Inmarsat. In a cooperative effort unprecedented in Europe, the team was supported by ESA and France’s CNES space agency, as well as TAS (Thales Alenia Space) for Alphabus platform operations.
Figure 24: Artist's rendition of Alphasat (image credit: ESA)
Payloads of Alphasat I-XL:
Alphasat I-XL carries a commercial payload for Inmarsat - a new generation of advanced geomobile communications payload in L-band (1.6 GHz) that will augment Inmarsat’s BGAN (Broadband Global Area Network) service, enabling communications across Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East with increased capacity. Alphasat I-XL features a new-generation digital signal processor for the payload, and a 12 m ∅ aperture antenna reflector. Alphasat I-XL is designed with increased capacity, 750 channels and 400-500 spot beams.
Alphasat I-XL also carries the hosted TDPs (Technology Demonstration Payloads) for ESA (European Space Agency). 46)
Note: Only a few aspects of the commercial payload can be provided (due to a lack of information); the intent is to provide an overview of the hosted payloads of ESA.
Integrated Processor (IP): The IP, developed for the Alphasat mobile mission, is the latest evolution of Astrium’s Digital Signal Processors product line – a technology that, for space applications. It is based on Astrium Next Generation Processor modular technology, which can be applied for other applications such as broadband and military missions (Ref. 10).
Astrium’s eight IPs are a core element of the leading-edge geomobile L-band communications payload, allowing allocation of capacity with an unprecedented flexibility through digital channelization and beamforming. It represents a major step forward in payload operational capability and commercial competitiveness.
The primary function of Alphasat’s IPs is the routing and combining of channels to the desired beam. They are the key elements for the generation of spot beams and associated channel gain. This provides Alphasat with maximum flexibility in both frequency and power allocation to beams to meet traffic demands.
Figure 25: Photo of the IP assembly (image credit: Astrium)
The 8 IPs have a mass of ~ 250 kg and use the latest electronics technology to work in parallel on board Alphasat. The DPM (Digital Processing Module )in each IP includes 17 large ASICs (core computers) which contain all of the complex digital processing for routing and beam forming, providing Alphasat with a processing capacity which is unprecedented on board a commercial satellite: it can perform more than 10 trillion calculations per second!
Deployable AstroMesh Reflector of commercial payload:
Astro Aerospace of Carpentaria, CA (USA), a strategic business unit of Northrop Grumman Corporation, has delivered its fourth deployable AstroMesh reflector to Astrium in Toulouse, France, this one for the Alphasat I-XL spacecraft that will provide commercial, broadband telecommunications services (L-band) to Europe, the Middle East, Africa and parts of Asia. 47) 48)
The reflector of 12 m aperture is the latest in a line of successful AstroMesh deployable, large aperture reflectors developed and built by Astro Aerospace. The reflector is a key part of the antenna system used by the spacecraft to provide broadband Internet communications. Enabled by the large reflector, the antenna system's sensitivity allows the use of mobile, laptop-size modems by users around the world.
Once the Alphasat satellite reaches orbit, ground controllers issue commands that control three hinge motors that unfold a 6 m boom supporting the reflector above the satellite. Additional ground commands are sent to two motors that unfurl the reflector to its fully deployed size.
• 112 kg subsystem mass (including boom & attachment hardware)
• 41 kg reflector only mass.
Alphasat I-XL features a new generation digital signal processor for the commercial payload.
Figure 26: Photo of the deployed AstroMesh reflector (image credit: Astro Aerospace)
Hosted TDPs (Technology Demonstration Payloads: LCT, Q/V-band transponder, Star Tracker, AEEF)
As a cost-effective way to deploy new services, validate new technologies, give them ‘flight heritage’ in space and introduce them in the commercial market, the concept of ‘hosted payloads’ offers a win-win-win solution for operators, industry and public institutions alike. 49) 50)
Hosted payloads benefit from available capacity on commercial satellites to accommodate additional transponders, instruments, or other applications that have to be operated in space. Partners share the satellite platform. This arrangement takes less time and money to implement, allowing advances in satcom technologies and services and new businesses to grow. This concept has also been referred to as ‘piggybacking’, ‘hitchhiking’ or secondary payloads.
Through ARTES, ESA has supported a number of hosted payloads over the years. These include the launch of the Skyplex processor payload on the Hot Bird 4 satellite of Eutelsat (launch Feb. 27, 1998 into GEO), followed by AmerHis on Amazonas 1 (AmerHis is the first operational regenerative, onboard processing, satellite switching system in the world, launch August 5, 2004). AmerHis has enabled Hispasat (Spanish telecommunications satellite service provider) to provide high-performance interactive multimedia services on its four Ku-band coverage zones: North America, South America, Brazil and Europe. The AmerHis system is an innovative solution of satellite broadband mesh communication based on a regenerative DVB-S/DVB-RCS processor.
Figure 27: Photo of Alphasat during encapsulation on July 15, 2013 (image credit: ESA,Ref. 50)
Legend to Figure 27: Alphasat carries a quartet of test technologies on its side: Q/V-band transponder, AEEF,Star Tracker, and LCT. The first and last of these are particularly conspicuous due to their covering of gold-coloured foil.
LCT (Laser Communication Terminal - TDP1):
Developed by Tesat Spacecom (Germany) and Ruag Space (Switzerland) with funding from DLR (German Space Agency) and the Swiss Space Office, and coordinated by ESA, this TDP1 (Technology Demonstration Payload 1) is a data relay mission to link observation data from LEO observation satellites towards a ground station through the geostationary Alphasat. The data-relay link between LEO and GEO will enable direct downloads from Earth observation satellites to small terminals, allowing for example, rescue workers to see near-realtime satellite imagery of the region where they are working. The LCT instrument is of TerraSAR-X, NFIRE (DoD) and TanDEM-X mission heritage. 51) 52)
Figure 28: Tesat Spacecom 2nd generation LCT instrument showing the space side with hemispherical coarse pointing unit (image credit: Tesat)
The LCT provides a 2 Gbit/s bidirectional data link between the LEO satellite and the Alphasat I GEO satellite using laser diode pumped Nd:Yag (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) crystal lasers transmitting infrared light at an ultrastable wavelength of 1.064 µm.
The LCT includes two major functions: to relay Earth observation data from LEO satellites (for example, Sentinel-1), and to verify the bidirectional optical link (experiment results, such as error counts, sensor data, etc., are transmitted via Alphasat telemetry to the ground for evaluation).
The major advantage of laser communication terminals compared to conventional RF payloads is their very high data rate, and this is the first time that such an optical LEO-to-GEO link will be verified in orbit. This TDP is a precursor of an operational optical communication system that will be used for ESA's EDRS (European Data Relay System).
The satellite laser terminal acquires the very weak signal from the optical beam of an optical counter terminal, which may be up to 50,000 km away. Once acquired, the data transmission between the two laser terminals (LEO and GEO) starts. Considering that LEO satellites travel at ~ 8 km/s (28,000 km/h), and the GEO satellite at about 3 km/s (11,000 km/h) in different directions, accomplishing this link is indeed a big challenge.
The received data are then downlinked via the Ka-band transmitter to the DLR ground station. More than ten LEO-to-GEO links per day in the first years of operation are expected.
Table 3: Key design features for LCT LEO-GEO relay 53)
The LCT block diagram is shown in Figure 29. Major changes are: For the 2nd generation LCT an off-axis telescope is chosen, the optical power amplifier is changed to a 5 W device, the receiver is optimized for a user data rate of 1.8Gbit/s. For GEO applications, the electronics were redesigned to operate the adapted devices and to match with the GEO radiation environment for 15 years of continuous service. The thermal system is improved, the mechanics scaled for the bigger units. 56)
LCT generic design/qualification approach: The LCTs are built such, that the LCTs for GEO and LEO application are same for its units design and their qualification. The GEO and LEO LCTs have identical optical space interfaces with same performance. For adaptation of the generic design to the 2nd generation LCT to S/C application, only the spacecraft interface related items (e.g. bus voltage, TM/TC interface and thermal interface) are modified. In Figure 30. the Alphasat LCT is seen with its customized thermal interface for the Alphasat spacecraft.
Figure 31: Alphasat data relay payload (image credit: Tesat) 57)
Q/V-band transponder payload (TDP5) / Aldo Paraboni Payload:
The Q/V-band payload, developed by TAS-I (Thales Alenia Space-Italia) and Space Engineering, has the objective to assess the suitability of this millimeter-wave band for future commercial applications. The propagation package will allow beacon measurements throughout Europe at Ka-band (19.704 GHz) and Q-band (39.402 GHz). The TDP5 payload is funded by ASI (Agenzia Spaziale Italiana). 58) 59) 60) 61) 62)
In the summer of 2013, ASI decided to rename the Q/V transponder payload to “Aldo Paraboni Payload” in memory of the late Professor Aldo Paraboni, who died on April 13, 2013 and who had dedicated his academic life to space telecommunications research in all ASI projects. 63) 64)
Advantages and today's limitations of Q/V-bands: 65)
• Larger bandwidth
• Smaller antenna for fixed gain
• Higher gain for fixed antenna
• Enhanced directivity for spot beams systems
• Increase of atmospheric impairments
• Research activities needed
• Different design approach: a) FMT(Fade Mitigation Technique), b) lower QoS (Quality of Service).
Given the very strong atmospheric fading that can be experienced at Q/V frequencies, the communication experiment is aimed at demonstrating the capability of IFMT (Interference and Fading Mitigation Techniques), and site diversity in improving the link quality in a real Q/V band satellite link.
In 2009, ASI (Italian Space Agency) invited Austria to join the TDP5 experiments. Thanks to the support by the Austrian Aeronautics and Space Agency, it was decided that a Q/V-band ground station will be established in Graz to be able to carry out joint communications and propagation experiments with the Italian partners: ASI, Space Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, and Università Tor Vergata of Rome. As a consequence of these agreements, it was decided to redirect the third beam of the Q/V-band payload to be centered over Austria. Joanneum Research and Graz University of Technology (TU Graz) are the Austrian partners in the Q/V-band payload preparing for communications and propagation experiments.
The main goal of the communications experiments is the investigation of ACM (Adaptive Modulation and Coding) techniques. At millimeter-waves the propagation effects can be very significant. A conventional system design with large fade margins is impractical, as this leads to high EIRP and G/T figures for the ground stations resulting in unacceptable costs. Fade mitigation techniques by adaptive coding and modulation offer a cost-effective solution to this problem.
In the framework of several ESA activities a meshed VSAT system has been developed which uses an advanced MF-TDMA demand assignment access scheme and an adaptive modem and Turbo codec. The synchronization algorithms for the modem have been optimized such that the modem can operate at a very low signal/noise ratio. This platform is ideal for the ACM experiments. The propagation studies and measurements will provide the data for the fade depths, fade slopes and scintillation effects. Based on the measurement results, the ACM algorithms will be optimized and verified in the communications experiments.
The block diagram of the Alphasat Q/V-band transponder is shown in Figure 33. The payload configuration can be seen in Figure 34. The two antennas have a diameter of 35 cm x 42 cm. The nominal output power of the transponder is 5 W at Q-band.
Figure 32: Photo of the Q/V-band communication repeater - also referred to as QVCA (image credit: TAS-I)
The QVCA (Q/V-band Communication Antenna) service area is composed of 3 ground stations. The beam centers have been defined for communications with three ground stations located at:
5) IT1: Tito Scalo (40º35’55” N, 15º43’23“ E), in southern Italy
6) IT2: Spino d’Adda (45º24’ N, 9º29‘E), in northern Italy
7) EU1: Graz (47º05‘07” N, 15º27’54“ E), Austria
The transponders can be operated in different configurations: cross-strapped or loop-back (Figure 34). In the cross-strap mode, any two beams can be interconnected, leaving the third beam idle. The space-to-Earth center frequencies are 37.9 and 38.1 GHz.
The maximum EIRP of the transponder is 39 dBW, when remaining in the linear mode. The polarization is linear vertical to take advantage of the fact that the vertical polarization is less affected by rain fade than the horizontal plane. The Earth-to-space frequencies are 47.9 and 48.1 GHz. The figure of merit (G/T) of the transponder yields 4.4 dB/K (taking into account the spacecraft movement). A transponder channel bandwidth of 10 MHz is available.
Since the Q/V-band payload is a secondary and an experimental one, the EIRP and G/T are comparatively low, requiring relatively powerful ground stations.
The block diagram of the ground station is shown in Figure 35. VHL (70/140 MHz) as well as L-band interfaces will be provided for maximum flexibility. The 70/140 MHz signal will be upconverted to L-band by a converter unit. In a second stage, the signal will be translated to the transmit frequency of 47.9 or 48.1 GHz and fed to a driver amplifier. Its output drives the HPA (High Power Amplifier). At the output of the power amplifier, a remote-controlled waveguide switch connects either to the antenna or a dummy load. Prior to the dummy load, a test signal is available via a 40 dB coupler which can be connected to a spectrum analyzer, a counter or the test translator, converting the V-band signal to Q-band.
Since only a single polarization is used (vertical), no ortho-mode transducer is required. However, a high-performance diplexer is needed. At the V-band port, the HPA is connected, whereas the LNA is directly attached to the Q-band port. At its output a coupler or switch allows to feed in the test translator output signal, when the station is in test mode. This configuration avoids degrading the system noise figure by a coupler or waveguide switch at the LNA input. The amplified Q-band signal is down-converted to L-band where it is directly available for L-band communications systems. If terminals with 70/140 MHz interfaces have to be used, a second down-converter from L-band will be utilized.
The tracking system will be either monopulse or step-track depending on the antenna size which will be finally chosen. In principle, program track could be used as well, but this prerequisites excellent-quality and up-to-date Kepler elements.
The propagation receiver, which has to measure a cross-polar Q-band beacon and a vertically polarized Ka-band beacon will be connected to a separate co-located antenna. This avoids a very complicated and expensive feed and front-end. This decision was supported by the fact that the already well advanced beacon receiver project will get its own antenna with tracking from ESA.
Figure 36: Overview of the Q/V-band ground stations in the TDP5 payload (image credit: ASI)
Figure 37: Alternate view of the TDP5 ground system (image credit: Space Engineering S.p.A., ASI) 66)
• TDP5 features two fully redundant beacon transmitters operating at Ka-/Q-band. The Ka-band beacon at 19.7 GHz covers Europe and North Africa (Figure 38). The polarization is linear vertical. The Q band beacon at 39.4 GHz covers Europe with a maximum antenna gain over Milan (Figure 39). The Q-band beacon polarization is linear NW-SE (45° tilted). Table 4 summarizes the Alphasat beacon characteristics. 67)
Figure 38: Alphasat TDP5 beacon coverage of the Ka-band, 19.701 GHz 68)
Star Tracker (TDP6):
Developed by Jena Optronik GmbH (Germany), the Astro-APS (Active Pixel Sensor) star tracker is included to gain early flight heritage on this new product. It is capable of very accurate and autonomous attitude acquisition. The sensor is highly resilient to the radiation experienced in geostationary orbits. 69) 70)
Figure 40: Photo of the Astro-APS star tracker (image credit: Jena Optronik)
Star trackers are used for attitude control of current generation communication satellites. By using stars as reference points, star trackers are help to make sure that a satellite keeps in the same position and points in the right direction. The higher the accuracy, the better a satellite can operate and spend less fuel, allowing a longer life in orbit. A star tracker can be heavily influenced by the radiation and sunlight. Jena Optronik’s new generation of star tracker offers higher precision.
The Astro-APS uses the most radiation hard CMOS Active Pixel Sensor on the market, the STAR1000. Each pixel has an individual readout, thereby avoiding “blooming” of charge over to neighboring pixels. This improves performance with bright objects in the field of view, e.g. the moon. The centroid calculations are done on the same integrated circuit resulting in tracking rates, e.g. 10 Hz, that are much faster than CCD-based star trackers. Built-in software algorithms automatically identify and compensate for anomalies such as white spots. A Peltier cooler is included. The star sensor is a single unit with camera head, electronics, and a shorter baffle than on CCD-based star trackers.
Table 5: Performance of ASTRO-APS
The ASTRO-APS star tracker of Jena-Optronik GmbH provides autonomously high accurate 3-axis attitude information with regard to the J2000 inertial reference frame and 3-axis angular rate measurements of the spacecraft.
Figure 41: ASTRO-APS Star Tracker qualification project plan (image credit: Jena-Optronik, ESA)
The key-issues addressed in the scope of this qualification are the following:
- Redesign of the electronics from the EM configuration to the EQM
- Redesign of the S/W according to lessons learned from the EM tests and implementation of advanced acquisition algorithms
- Re-work of the EM mechanical structure and optics for the usage in the EQM (if necessary) and optimization of APS detector cooling
- Procurement of the DC/DC-converter
- Surface Mounted Technology (SMT) Process Verification
- Manufacturing, Assembly and Integration of the star tracker unit including baffle
- Qualification test campaign of the star tracker including baffle.
AEEF (Alphasat Environment Effects Facility - TDP8):
The AEEF is designed and developed by the EFACEC group (Portugal) in cooperation with the University of Aveiro (Portugal) and DAS Photonics (Valencia, Spain). The objective of AEEF is to test electronic components and solid-state materials in the radiation environment of a geostationary orbit. An energy selective particle spectrometer measures these radiation levels in parallel (Ref. 49). 71) 72) 73)
AEEF is comprised of a number of different elements measuring specific environments and effects together with dedicated hardware for data storage and interface to the spacecraft. The environments monitored include:
• High energy radiation (from the radiation belt, solar flares and cosmic rays)
• Low energy electrons
• Micrometeoroids and debris.
Additionally, AEEF includes a Component Technology Test Bed to investigate the effects of radiation on components (particularly of interest to the Alphasat payload). The following effects are monitored:
• Single event effects (e.g. single event upsets, single event transients)
• TID (Total Ionizing Dose) degradation (specifically of interest in the electron rich Alphasat environment)
• DD (Displacement Damage) to optoelectronics and detectors, and radiation background in sensors.
The objectives include full validation of hardening methods used in design, validation of new testing and analysis methods and demonstration of novel EEE (Electrical, Electronic and Electromechanical) component technologies. Additionally the validity of ground-based testing compared to in-flight results will be studied.
Figure 42: Illustration of the AEEF assembly (image credit: ESA, EFACEC)
AEEF includes two technology demonstration boards: one SIOS (Sistema de Interconexiones Ópticas para Satélites) optical link demonstration board and one GaN (Gallium Nitride) board. The SIOS optical link demonstration board will include 4 low data rate (1 Mbit/s) and 4 medium data rate (100 Mbit/s) optical links, with different power budgets among them to check the impact on each power output in flight conditions. The experiment will be running during 3-5 years, testing their power consumption and monitoring BER in real flight conditions. 74) 75)
Figure 43: EQM (Engineering Qualification Model) of the SIOS experiment for AEEF (image credit: DAS Photonics)
GaN (Gallium Nitride): GaN is currently used in terrestrial applications such as LEDs (Light Emitting Diodes) and radio frequency applications up to 60 GHz. It provides several advantages compared to more conventional semiconductor technologies based on Silicon and GaAs (Gallium Arsenide). The most important feature is its high breakdown voltage (10-fold when compared to Si) allowing for compact high speed devices with significantly increased output power. For space applications, its reduced sensitivity to cosmic radiation is of particular importance and a decisive advantage over Si devices. 76)
The AEEF assembly has a mass of 10 kg, a total power consumption of < 25 W EOL, and a nominal lifetime of 3 years. AEEF will be monitored at Inmarsat, London and at the ESA TDP Coordination Office (Ref. 73).
Alphasat I-XL GS (Ground Segment) Overview:
The Alphasat I-XL satellite is developed through a Public Private Partnership (PPP) between Inmarsat and ESA. Alphasat will be integrated into the Inmarsat satellite fleet to provide mobile satellite communications services for users in the maritime, land and aviation sectors. It will provide coverage over Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East.
The Alphasat services and ground segment developments are developed in partnership with ESA as part of the PPP with Inmarsat. Those activities cover the design and development of new services, ground segment infrastructure, user terminal technology and applications with the aim to fully exploit the capabilities of Alphasat.
The Alphasat spacecraft is operated from the Inmarsat SCC (Satellite Operations Center) in London. All systems required for the realtime monitoring and control of the flight segment are located at the Inmarsat satellite (fleet) control center.
Given the very different nature of the commercial primary mission of the satellite, and the scientific, experimental mission of its hosted payloads (the TDPs), an ad-hoc concept of operation has been devised. This concept needed primarily to consider that the commercial operator of the satellite had to include the new satellite into its fleet of multi-families (from different makers) satellites, controlled via a UMCS (Unified Monitoring and Control System). The operations concept for the TDPs has been therefore designed to interface with the existing ground segment systems minimizing (or avoiding wherever possible) the need for modifications. The resulting concept aims at making the activities of the TDPs de-coupled from, and transparent to the commercial operations execution. This has been achieved by establishing an upstream coordination and interfacing entity, capable of providing the required exchanges of data for in-flight operations, while minimizing the impact in the Inmarsat satellite control center, both for the operations planning and the TDPs monitoring functions. 77)
• On the monitoring side, a relatively straightforward solution is identified; with the implementation of a “black-box” approach to TDPs operations, based on a non-interference basic rule.
• On the controlling side, the same approach is complicated by the need to provide consistent and consolidated operational requests to the commercial operator in line with the operations execution products (TC sequences, procedures, etc) validated in cooperation with the satellite manufacturer.
The systems required to process the ESA TDPs (Technology Demonstration Payloads) and platform TM packets are located at the TDP OCs (Operation Centers) . The telemetry is monitored for limit transgressions, and processed to produce the scientific products. Archiving of the TDP and platform (as available to the TDP) telemetry is performed at the TDPs OCs.
Figure 44 illustrates the overall TDPs ground segment, including the Inmarsat SCC. The various TDP OCs and related systems are color-coded to highlights the involvement of other actors, notably for TDP1 (in red) and TDP5 (in yellow) for the experimental exploitation of the corresponding hosted payload.
Due to the different nature of the hosted payload, their experimental requirements, constraints, corresponding plans, and the need to coordinate and de-conflict the operations requests of the TDPs amongst themselves and with respect to the platform activities, it was decided early in the operations preparations to provide a single operations interface to Inmarsat.
Although a direct data interface link does exist for TM streaming and monitoring access between Inmarsat and the TDPs, the TECO (TDPs ESA Coordination Office) provides this single point of contact between the Inmarsat SCC and the TDP OCs, called MCC (Mission Control Center) for TDP1 and TDP5. 78)
Inmarsat has prepared a TDP operational data ICD (Interface Control Document), detailing the required format of all operational products to be transferred between INM (Inmarsat) and the TDP Operations Centers, e.g. weekly operations requests and OEMs (Orbit Ephemeris Messages). Similarly, an ESA provided ICD regulates the operational interface between the TDP OCs, the TECO, and INM.
TDPs operations concept and general rules:
The following principles were agreed between Inmarsat and ESA as the working basis for the hosted payload operations, responding to general operations requirements, as well as specific requirements for particular phases or scenarios of the Alphasat and TDPs missions. The resulting operations concept aims at satisfying the three main drivers of the Alphasat hosted payload mission:
- Fulfillment of each TDP experimentation plan
- Non-interference with the Alphasat (commercial) mission objectives
- De-coupling from and transparency to Alphasat (commercial) operations.
• The TDP operations execution only is performed by Inmarsat. This is driven entirely by the inputs and supplementary information received from the satellite manufacturer (procedures, etc), TDP supplier (e.g. procedure’s parameters values) and ESA (e.g. consolidated TDP operations requests and schedule).
• No TDP operations engineering activities are performed by Inmarsat, i.e. no TDP contingency recovery actions are defined, and no analysis of TDP performance or health are performed by Inmarsat. This implies that the initial conditions for the execution of all operations shall be verified in (at the beginning of) the corresponding flight operation procedure.
• The downlink data and telemetry budget, and therefore experiment execution, is shared between the TDPs and operational requests are managed at a top level by ESA.
• To obtain a seamless integration of the TDPs operations into the Inmarsat fleet operations, the standard operations interface products already in use at Inmarsat for operations automation have been used. Although a certain level of tailoring has been found necessary, the flexibility of the pre-existing system has permitted a simple customization, with most changes deriving from the need to agree on common naming conventions and definitions.
• It has been decided, on the planning side, to follow a weekly incremental cycle. This permits to harmonize the TDP operations with the satellite housekeeping cycles (notably, station keeping maneuvers). The TDP operational requests are thus delivered weekly to Inmarsat, where the requests are integrated with the spacecraft and prime payload operations scheduling.
• Operations requests are in the form predefined “tasks”, defined via the corresponding procedure IDs, parameter and timing values. All procedures, in their validated and executable form, are located at the Inmarsat Operations Center and are referenced for operational use only by ID via the tasks invoked. Command IDs are held within these procedures and are constructed for execution by the MCS using the information in the SRDB (Satellite Reference Database). Procedure parameters to be used at execution time are identified by the PPF (Procedure Parameter File) IDs.
• Inmarsat responds with the spacecraft schedule subsets, as appropriate for the TDPs, which will confirm, or otherwise, the inclusion of the TDP operations in the spacecraft activity schedule. In some cases the TDP operational requests may not be included in the spacecraft activity schedule due to ongoing operational, maintenance or contingency activities. The rejected operational requests are notified to the parties involved.
Commissioning and IOT (In-Orbit Test):
• Initialization and commissioning activities were performed per TDP in pre-scheduled periods according to the approved overall Commissioning plan.
• With the exception of the switching ON of one of the hosted payload (TDP6), that took place as soon as possible after launch, the initialization of the TDPs started after the Platform and Prime mission had been fully initialized and were coordinated with the satellite commissioning activities. Although it had been (naturally) agreed that these latter took precedence over TDPs activities, no conflicts were encountered throughout the exercise.
• All Initialization and Commissioning procedures were provided by the TDP suppliers, communicated to the satellite manufacturer, and validated in the spacecraft context prior to delivery to Inmarsat. These included contingency recovery procedures for the known failure scenarios, aiming at bringing the TDP into a safe (OFF) status for further investigation without impacting the overall flight plan (subsequent commissioning activities timeline).
• TDP, ESA and ADS (Airbus Defence and Space) representatives were present, where necessary, at Inmarsat, depending on the complexity of the operations. A dedicated support space allowing access to realtime data was made available to the TDP representatives. Operations were conducted in real-time allowing insertion of parameters after near-realtime data processing by the TDP supplier. Beyond TM monitoring facilities, all software tools required for data processing by the TDP team was provided by the TDP suppliers.
It shall be noted that the Commissioning Plan and sequence of procedures for the TDPs to be included in Alphasat IOT phase were frozen at FAR (Flight Acceptance Review). Given the nature of the hosted payload (“technological demonstrators”) the plans were designed on-purpose following an atomized approach, to permit single and self-standing building blocks to be rearranged according to possible timeline changes driven by the satellite or the concerned TDP in-flight needs. Although no changes were dictated by the flight segment, this proved extremely useful to accommodate few re-schedule needs (arising from events affecting notably the TDPs GS or data interpretation/calibration delays).
• The Alphasat TDPs nominal mission planning cycle is based on a 7 day cycle with the possibility for parameter inputs from the TDP operations centers on a daily basis.
• Notwithstanding the mode dependency for the provision of attitude data from the TDP6 star tracker to the TDP1 laser communication terminal for pointing purposes, the TDPs are designed with minimal inter-TDP operational constraints, such as power or thermal constraints. However, if any constraints exist between the operations of the TDPs, these will need to be checked and resolved before forwarding consolidated operations requests to Inmarsat. The ESA TDPs Coordination Office is foreseen to help the TDPs Operations Centers in the planning exercise, to avoid schedule conflicts, while the responsibility for the correctness and compatibility of the operations requests rests with the TDPs team.
• In case of breach at execution time of any of the budgets limitation (notably power or bandwidth), Inmarsat SCC can unilaterally interrupt (abort) the current TDP task execution, without previous notification. Notification of the event is given as soon as practicable.
• The objective at system level is to design the TDPs and their operations such that they are robust to inter-TDP constraints and conflicts. If conflicts are identified, the TECO planning system attempts to resolve them with the TDP operations centers, and ensure that the TDP requests received by Inmarsat will be conflict free.
• Inmarsat will not react to TDP anomalous conditions. The parameters monitored by the FDIR (Failure Detection Isolation and Recovery), will protect the TDP against all foreseen critical anomalies requiring a response time less than 2 weeks.
• The FDIR have a simple recovery action for the TDPs, e.g. switch off, so as to allow continuation of the Prime mission with no risk for the Prime mission performance. The ground is notified of the FDIR action and trigger conditions in the nominal telemetry and the information is provided to the TDP suppliers as part of the TDP telemetry and auxiliary data delivered via the nominal mechanism.
• Anomaly Review Boards are convened to review the causes of any anomalous TDP behavior and to assess the recommended actions. ESA, ADS and TDP supplier participate in the ARB and agree on the actions to return to nominal operations of the TDP affected. The recovery actions, procedures and any required computations and parameters have to be prepared and validated by the TDP supplier and ADS, and are submitted to Inmarsat for verification and acceptance.
• The TDP recovery operations are conducted via the nominal mission planning cycle or more quickly on a best effort basis by Inmarsat.
• In the case of recurring or known anomalies with defined TM profiles, Inmarsat will respond based on a clearly defined action recorded in ad-hoc created procedures if within existing resources (both pre- and post-launch) and on a best effort basis.
• In the case of an anomaly on the Alphasat platform or payload, Inmarsat has the right to suspend TDP operations without notice. TDP operations are usually suspended by the on-board FDIR in case of anomaly, but Inmarsat may also suspend the TDP operations from ground, by triggering the automated TDP switch off sequence or in accordance with a validated procedure, and suspending all further TDP operations from ground. Information on the time at which TDP operations are suspended are provided to the TDP operations centers but no further information are made available, as these are made available via the normal periodic provision of TM/TC/Event logs.
• A simple “Emergency Switch OFF” procedure has been provided by each TDPs, to be used by Inmarsat in the scenario described above, or as a further safety measure in case of an unforeseen anomalous behavior of a TDP (i.e. not covered by FDIR).
• In the case of toggling out of limits (OOLs), Inmarsat would raise an Anomaly Report and edit the limit in the database to prevent continuous system alarming. Action should be taken by the TDP operations center and ADS to either plan the appropriate recovery action, as part of the nominal planning cycle, or to update the limits in the next database update.
Similarly to the commissioning and IOT phase, decommissioning of the TDPs at the end of (their) operational life will be performed via an agreed ad-hoc plan, using bespoken pre-validated procedures.
TDPs Monitoring and Control:
The MCS (Monitoring and Control System) of Alphasat, including the TDPs flight segment, is managed by Inmarsat from the MCC (Mission Control Center) in London. Inmarsat have operational interfaces with all necessary operational elements, including the ground stations, the TDP operations centers and ESA. All operational versions of procedures and databases and all telemetry and telecommand data will be archived. The functional architecture (topology) of the Alphasat ground segment as applicable for the TDP operations is shown in Figure 45.
Figure 45 highlights the (near) realtime connection via UDP (User Datagram Protocol) stream of TM directly from the Inmarsat SCC (in blue), and the ftp based exchange of non real-time data both from off-line monitoring and control (planning) purposes (in red). Not shown in the picture is the NRT (Near-Realtime) TM monitoring system, based on the MCS server owned by TECO but based at INM.
The sole operations planning and control interface for Inmarsat SCC is to the TECO (TDPs ESA Coordination Office), while a direct data interface, coordinated for the TDPs by TECO, for the TM and NRT monitoring access to the TDP Operations Centers is established. Data exchange is performed through a ftp server, located at Inmarsat, and accessible by all parties via Internet, and a similar ftp server, located at TECO. Authorized users are able to access the ftp server via a secure login and user account VPN (Virtual Private Network). TM packets are distributed to TDP operations centers and ESA via UDP broadcast and are interpreted and archived by the operating system located at the users’ site. In addition, a NRT monitoring facility has been implemented by providing remote access by TECO and the TDPs Operations Centers (OCs) to a dedicated server at Inmarsat running an ad-hoc configured version of the SCC/MCS (Satellite Control Center/Monitoring and Control System) I4S (Innovative Satcom Security System for Ships).
SRDB (Spacecraft Reference Data Base):
TDP telemetry and telecommands are contained in the SRDB. The SRDB will be populated by ADS(Airbus Defense and Space) using information supplied by the TDP suppliers. The SRDB is fully validated at satellite system level before delivery to Inmarsat.
The SRDB contains, where necessary, the relevant TDP limit checks, validity and pre- and post- execution check information, as required. It is agreed that TDP limits are for information only, and no actions are required from Inmarsat if limits are transgressed, given that all failure detection and isolation are handled autonomously on-board (i.e. all TDP failures requiring action are handled by the FDIR software).
TDP Monitoring and Data Management:
Three different ways of monitoring the TDPs are provided (as illustrated in Figure 46):
- UDP TM stream (packets)
- Daily products via FTP (File Transfer Protocol)
- Web-based connection to the dedicated MCS server.
Attitude information, within nominal limits, will be made available to the TDP operations centers using the nominal mechanism. The attitude may be raw/calibrated telemetry or the processed derived parameter. Outside nominal limits, no data will be available.
1) UDP (User Datagram Protocol) TM Stream: A realtime interface is available to provide, via UDP broadcast, to the TDP their own TM data (packets and parameters generated by the hosted payloads and downlinked in the satellite TM stream), and a subset of selected platform telemetry parameters, pertinent for TDP performance evaluation and activity planning. The set of auxiliary data is agreed between ESA and Inmarsat, and filtering is performed at packet level by masking out the non-available parameter by substituting their value with a predetermined binary sequence.
To use the UDP stream, the TDP operations centers have to provide for extracting the parameters from the packets and performing any necessary processing. - In the case of an Alphasat anomaly, Inmarsat has the right to disconnect the near real time interface to the external operators.
2) Daily products via FTP: Every 24 hours, the last 24 hours of TM are available on an ad-hoc INM ftp server, where they remain available for a limited period. In addition, the telecommand history filtered for the TDPs (and containing a pre-defined sub-set of relevant platform commands), information regarding database limit transgressions, and selected spacecraft generated events related to the TDPs, as relevant, etc. are uploaded to the server.
The non-TM information comes from the AWE (Alarms, Warnings and Events) log. Messages from procedures are also posted to the AWE and so could be used to provide complementary information to the TC history. Filtered operations logs containing TDP SRDB limit transgressions and TDP commands sent, are uploaded to the ftp server daily; any other messages to TDP Operations Centers may also be conveyed via this mechanism.
3) Web-based connection to dedicated MCS server: A dedicated MCS server is installed at the Inmarsat SCC premises, providing remote access via a COTS Web Browser to the monitoring facilities and the RT TM in the very same environment (and with the same MMI) of the actual Inmarsat “I4S” unified Monitoring and Control System used for the handling of its multi-family fleet of geostationary satellites.
Figure 47 shows the high level architecture of the provided system (customization of the general I4S MCS platform).
The ESA TDP I4s system is a TM processing and archiving system which can operate independently of the Inmarsat System provided a (filtered) TM feed is supplied. In practice the TM feed will always come from the Inmarsat SCC via UDP ensuring uninterrupted data supply.
The SGD (Secure Global Desktop) software is in use to allow access to the I4S system, allowing a remote user to access the back office machines via a standard Web Browser interface (architecture used already by the Inmarsat SCC for remote access to their I4S system).
The following components are available in the TECO I4S server:
- System Services (handles system services execution)
- Telemetry Processing (decommutation, EU conversion, limit checking and data distribution)
- Archive (provides for raw telemetry and AWE archiving)
- Alarm, Warning and Events Manager (provides system activity monitoring)
- Retrieval (retrieves data from archives and plays data back)
- Client API (provides programmers’ interface to telemetry and AWE’s).
At client level, accessible to the external users (TDPs), the following client components are available:
- Alarms, Warnings and Events Display
- Out of Limits Display
- Telemetry Displays (JADE) for ANDs, plots and mimics.
Moreover, this server permits the retrieval via a TER/TEF (TM Extraction Request/TM Extracted File) mechanism of finite period of TM in parameter based, ASCII files.
Nominal commanding is managed by the ground schedule execution system in line with the Mission Plan. The mission plan contains information on the operations to be performed over the week defined by references to pre-set “tasks” defined a-priori by specifying the composing procedure IDs, duration, and procedure execution times. The TDP commands held as part of the validated procedures are automatically released by the Inmarsat automated procedure execution system. It shall be noted that each procedure can be assigned a fixed execution start time or (as advisable) a start time and window of execution. In case of need for respecting an absolute time, a check of the time of execution needs be inserted in the procedure itself.
The spacecraft has the capability to either immediately execute the commands upon receipt at the spacecraft or insert them in the time-tag queue on board (OB TTQ). The nominal method for commanding is command release for immediate execution, from within procedures managed autonomously by the ground schedule execution system. TDP commanding shall only use time tagged commands (TTC) in the case of a hard requirement. Use of the OB TTQ is limited to specific operations that require a high commanding accuracy. These operations will require justification and shall be infrequent.
The procedures variables values are controlled through:
- ingestion of values from PPF (Procedure Parameter File)
- calculation within the procedure from values assigned in PPFs or telemetry
- manual setting
Parameter value assignment can be done only at run time. Nominally, interaction with the TDP procedures can only be done via PPFs. TDP PPFs must be delivered latest 2 hours before the actual procedure execution to the ftp server in the agreed format, and the corresponding task must have already been included in the schedule. The procedures support branching and the branching can be chosen based on telemetry or procedure variable values.
The Planning Cycle:
The Alphasat operations are based on a weekly incremental plan, and automated execution of the tasks scheduled. The TDPs activities are merged into the weekly schedule with the Inmarsat commercial and platform housekeeping activities. Figure 48 shows the TDPs weekly planning cycle, and how this is interfaced with INM planning exercise.
It shall be noted that the satellite position is maintained through a series of in and out of plane maneuvers performed following a 14 days cycle, with daily electric propulsion maneuvers compounded by bi-weekly chemical maneuvers. The corresponding orbit ephemeris data (OEM file) is produced weekly, 12 hours in advance of applicability time, and includes the consolidated predicted orbit for the next 7 days, and a preliminary orbit propagation for the subsequent 7 days (coarse prediction).
Each week on day 7, each TDP OC delivers to TECO the p-IOR (preliminary-Input Operations Request) based on the coarse OEM and preliminary platform activities knowledge (current OEM). The coarse OEM used by the TDP OCs may cover a period longer than the 14 days given in the Inmarsat provided OEM, and based on the requirement for the Alphasat satellite to stay within its orbital slot (±0.1º from the nominal longitudinal position). The p-IORs from all TDPs are made available to all TDP OCs to support the internal planning exercise leading to the production of the IOR (Input Operation Request).
Later the same day Inmarsat uploads to the Alphasat/TDP ftp server the TAPF ( TDPs Activity Planning File), containing the relevant spacecraft activities and TDP operations availability window, and an OEM (Orbit Ephemeris Message) data file. A notification is sent via email to the TDP users that the new planning input products have been published and are available for download. Authorized users are able to download the data as required. The orbit ephemeris files contain orbit parameters, and derived orbit event files (eclipses, etc), covering the orbit propagated over 14 days, with the first 7 days consolidated, assuming all maneuvers are executed as planned, and the second week only preliminary.
• Periods when TDP operations may be affected or not permitted are provided in the TAPF, delivered to the server. Different operational activities may have different limitations on TDP operations. A distinction is thus made between those periods where TDPs could experience reduced performance (e.g. maneuvers), where no TDP related commanding activities are permitted, and where limitations exist on TDPs modes (either for all TDPs or on a TDP by TDP basis).
• Every week, on day 1 (the day following the distribution of the planning input files by INM) the TDP Operations Centers provide each an IOR (Input Operations Request) file and the PPFs corresponding to all requested activities to the TECO. The TECO merges the IORs from the different TDPs and check for possible conflicts both with respect to the satellite activities and for inter-TDPs operational constraints.
• In case of conflict, an ad-hoc conflict warning message is sent to the involved TDPs, to trigger a last iteration for the possible solution and delivery of the (conflict free) IOR and corresponding PPF files.
• On the same day, based on the final IORs and PPFs received, the TECO sends to Inmarsat the consolidated TARF (TDPs Activities Request Files) and the corresponding PPFs. The TARF covers 7 days of operations requests in the form of tasks IDs and with the values of all parameters associated to the corresponding procedures.
• If necessary, during each of the 7 days of the running increment, the TDP OCs can calculate new values for the parameters needed for the execution of each relevant planned procedure and deliver them to Inmarsat for upload as a PPF (Procedure Parameter File) at least 2 hours before the procedure execution. The PPFs are delivered directly to the Inmarsat server to be ingested into the procedure execution scheduler, and used for procedure execution at run time.
• In some cases the TDP operational requests may not be included in the spacecraft schedule due to ongoing operational, maintenance or contingency activities. The TDP OCs are in this case notified of any discarded operational request. It is intended that this situation be minimized through the provision of weekly permitted TDP operations time window information within the TAPF.
• There is a very tight window for TDP planning between delivery of the TARF files and the final weekly operations plan production by Inmarsat, incorporating the TDP operations plan requests, thus the system at TECO permits, as is suggested, that the TDP rough planning is performed in advance, perhaps based on a standard operational activity profile and coarse ephemeris derived from the Alphasat orbital ‘box’. Execution times/windows are consolidated once ephemeris and availability windows are delivered to the server.
• Outside nominal operations of the TDPs, it is assumed that some calibration activities will be necessary. The calibration activities required during the routine operations phase shall be dealt with in the same way as the routine TDP operations; calibration requests shall be submitted for inclusion in the mission planning cycle, and the results of the activity, if required, will be evaluated off-line by the TDP supplier. Any parameter updates will be submitted, following evaluation, in the next mission planning cycle and may make use of PPFs.
Activities execution (and abortion):
At execution time, the TDP activities are passed to the automatic execution system, and the parameters corresponding to the procedures composing the activity are loaded from the corresponding PPF.
In case of a procedure step failure at run-time (eg TM check failure), the procedure is aborted and the operation abandoned. The TDP might be turned OFF via the contingency turn-OFF procedure. Contingency branching for the foreseeable step failures is included in the procedure. These procedure branches will lead the unit (TDP) to a safe and stable state (OFF if necessary) without requesting any human (Inmarsat controller) intervention.
As a matter of fact, all TDP procedure have been designed with:
• The provision of a “no operations” branch, by-passing all active steps and controlled by a PPF assigned “PROC_EXE” variable. Thus, in case for any reason the execution of a scheduled activity is not requested anymore, a simple PPF update permits to have a no-ops execution completely transparent to the Inmarsat SCC.
• A “controlled abortion” step, designed so that, in case of any failure encountered, the SCC operator shall jump to the execution of this step, ensuring a safe and stable final status to the TDP concerned.
TDP1 Ground System:
TDP1 is a German research and development program, designed to proof the concept of a relay satellite system using an optical data transfer system for the satellite to satellite ISL ((Inter-Satellite-Link) connection. The downlink of the relay data will be performed using a Ka-Band RF downlink. This mission is commonly considered the precursor to the EDRS (European Data Relay System) constellation.
Hence, DLR/GSOC (German Space Operations Center) was tasked with devolving and implementing the ground system and providing an end-to-end data relay service from a pick-up point on the originating spacecraft, to delivery of the data to the end user on ground. 79)
The overall system comprises of the optical terminal, LCT (Laser Communication Terminal), hosted on a geostationary spacecraft (Alphasat). In the case of TDP1, this satellite is not operated by GSOC, but by Inmarsat, which brings an additional player into the game, namely the ground system at GSOC, a dedicated antenna for the relayed data, an optical ground system and any combination of low- flying terminals.
According to the statement of work, the system should be capable of handling six optical terminals, one of which is aboard the relay spacecraft (Alphasat), one is an optical ground terminal, and the other ones are aboard low-flying objects (satellites or aircraft). A total of up to 22 optical links should be planned per day between any combination of two optical terminals.
The operational phase started after activation of the instrument on the geostationary spacecraft with calibration of the terminal, using the optical ground station. Second objective is verifying and improving operational interfaces with the operator of the host satellite.
Since there will be a gap between the activation of the LCT on Alphasat and the first low flying customer, the development of the ground system is split in two parts, the first stage will enable DLR to support the test with the relay satellite and allow the project then to include lessons learned into the completion of the system to perform the operations with the target constellation of 6 terminals.
The first two customers will be the LEO satellites Sentinel-1A and Sentinel-2A of ESA (European Space Agency). DLR/GSOC will interface with different ESA entities at different stages of the program and exchange different products. 80)
While EDRS is a commercial mission, TDP1 is a quasi-operational payload with the scope to demonstrate and validate operational scenarios for commercial missions, as well as serving for scientific and experimental tasks.
Elements of the TDP1 system:
LEO (Low Earth Orbiting) satellite:
The LEO is typically an earth observation satellite carrying one or more instruments that generate user data that have to be transferred to ground. In the conventional approach the data is transmitted to the ground through ground stations, for example in X-band (not shown in Figure 49). In the case of a relay satellite, the LEO transfers the data to the GEO satellite (link in red). Consequently the LEO has to be equipped with a high-data rate LEO to GEO communication device. In order to be able to transfer large amounts of data, at least two technologies might be used:
1) Optical communication with a laser terminal, i.e. the LCT (Laser Communication Terminal)
2) RF (Radio-Frequency) communication in Ka-band.
For the sake of clarity, only one LEO is shown in Figure 49. In fact, various LEOs may use the relay satellite either in parallel, or one after the other, depending on the technical implementation.
LEO SCC (LEO Satellite Control Center):
The LEO SCC operates the LEO satellite. It is responsible for housekeeping and payload operations. Among these tasks is the correct pointing and activation of the LEO to GEO communication device. For a correct pointing of the communication device towards the GEO, the GEO orbit has to be known to the LEO SCC.
GEO Relay Satellite:
The GEO spacecraft receives the user data from the LEO satellite and relays it to the ground. For this purpose it needs a receiver, which is compatible with the terminal of the LEO. Therefore, the same technologies come into consideration, namely LCT or Ka-band. As for the LEO, these devices are usually steerable and have to be pointed towards the LEO, depending on the used technology.
To complete the relay function, the GEO spacecraft needs a high data rate terminal to send the data to the ground. The technology that can be used for this purpose, is not dependent on the LEO to GEO link. To receive a comparable data rate, the Ka-band is used. TDP1 has one dedicated receive station, but the space to ground beam for a GEO satellite may cover a very large portion of the Earth, which enables various ground stations spread over large distances to receive the data in parallel. This is planned for the EDRS system.
GEO SCC (GEO Satellite Control Center):
The GEO satellite control center operates the GEO satellite. It is responsible for housekeeping and payload operations. Among these tasks is the correct pointing and activation of the receiver. In order to correctly point the receiver to the direction of the LEO satellite, the LEO orbit has to be known to the GEO SCC.
DLR/DFD (German Remote Sensing Data Center):
DFD provides the ground station that receives and stores the data transmitted by TDP1’s Ka-band antenna.
MCC (Mission Control Center):
The TDP1 MCC at GSOC is the core element in the system. It interfaces with all other components and coordinates them. Its main purpose is to receive all the link requests from the different users and generate a link session timeline, taking all known constraints into account. In addition it monitors and controls all involved infrastructure. Depending on the request of the customer, the MCC can extend its service to include all preparations for a data transfer, including preparation of procedures and generation of associated command files.
LCT operations development at DLR/GSOC:
Operations of TerraSAR-X:
GSOC became involved in LCT operations for the first time with the program TerraSAR-X, which hosted the LCT (Laser Communication Terminal) as a secondary payload. A second LCT is flying onboard the US DOD satellite NFIRE (Near Field Infrared Experiment), which is operated by the company Orbital Sciences Corporation (Orbital). NFIRE was launched in April of 2007 with TerraSAR following in June of the same year. GSOC is the operator of the TerraSAR-X and also commands the LCT. The TerraSAR-X LCT is designed for two types of contacts, a satellite to ground link and ISLs (Intersatellite Links). As the objective in this case is test and evaluation of LCT operations, the responsibilities are divided between GSOC, as the satellite operator, and the LCT manufacturer, Tesat Spacecom. The first LCT tests on TerraSAR were SGLs (Space-to-Ground Links), performed with ground terminals located on DLR property in Oberpfaffenhofen near Munich and on the island of Tenerife. The first ISLs were exercised starting in January of 2007.
Essential to all LCT operations is the planning cycle which is an iterative process. Starting out with the different orbit information one party, in case of TerraSAR-NFIRE ISLs, Orbital, calculates the link options and makes a pre-selection with available links. GSOC then coordinates of the final link selection and publishes the deconflicted links to all parties. The two control centers for TerraSAR and NFIRE then prepare individually their respective LCT operations, with input from the instrument manufacturer Tesat (in form of command input files) and their flight dynamics departments, which are Chebychev coefficients for the LCT pointing. GSOC then produces the detailed SOE (Sequence of Events) and provides it to Tesat. After the links, GSOC and Orbital make a quick determination of the success of the operations and provide all the corresponding data to Tesat for evaluation. Results then flow into the input for the next links.
Occasionally other partners like the DLR/IKN ( Institute of Communication and Navigation) request the opportunity to perform SGLs using their own optical ground stations. In that case, those partners provide their objectives to Tesat for them to generate the LCT configuration files and GSOC again publishes the SOE and performs the operations.
Figure 50: TerraSAR-X LCT operations concept (image credit: DLR/GSOC)
TDP1 System Design:
The next step in the evolution is the project TDP-1. TDP-1 is an experimental mission giving the proof of concept of a relay for Earth observation data from LEO spacecraft via a GEO satellite using laser as a transfer media. It is considered a precursor mission to the EDRS (European Data Relay System) project.
GSOC’s objective in the program is to establish a control center for LCT relay operations providing end-to-end service of data transfer from a LEO spacecraft via a relay satellite to the final data user. That means in theory a handover of the data at the originating source, i.e. the LEO satellite and delivery to a dedicated ground station or end user. In practical terms GSOC will be capable to execute all data transfer functions, including the operations of all participating laser terminals and RF equipment.
The TDP-1 payload, hosted on the geostationary satellite Alphasat, consists of a laser communication terminal, mainly for the ISL to a LEO spacecraft, and a Ka-band payload for the data downlink from the GEO satellite. GSOC started the preparatory design for the TDP-1 project in late 2011. The laser terminal can also be pointed to an optical ground station, a functionality that will be used during the commissioning phase for calibration purposes. The launch of the geostationary relay satellite Alphasat was on July 27, 2013. Sentinel-1a as the first LEO customers followed on April 3, 2014.
The participating agencies in the TDP-1 project are the DLR (German Aerospace Center) as the contracting entity or customer, with its institutes GSOC and DFD, Inmarsat hosting the GEO payload, Tesat Spacecom as the LCT manufacturer, and the European Space Agency as the first LEO customers.
The concept of operations for GSOC is that GSOC collects the orbital information of all participating spacecraft and possibly the ground contact information of the LEO satellites. It then performs visibility calculations and publishes visibility reports for periods of one week and collects link requests. On a specific day, GSOC forwards the final link selection to the TDP coordination office (TECO) at Inmarsat and receives feedback the next morning. Then, GSOC prepares the command information for all participating laser terminals. The downlink from the Alphasat is received via Ka-band at DLR/DFD, and the data is distributed from there. GSOC receives a report about the success of the link and LCT diagnostic data for Tesat for evaluation of the LCT performance.
The LCT terminal onboard Alphasat is also capable of contacting optical ground stations. This feature will be used for testing and calibration during the commissioning phase, when no LEO satellite is available. The first ISLs are planned for the first quarter of 2014.
Figure 51: Overview of elements in the TDP1 project (image credit: DLR/GSOC)
The information being exchanged between the GSOC and the partners are:
• LEO SCCs to GSOC: Orbit information, link requests, possible constraints, TLM
• GSOC to LEO SCCs: Link possibilities, SOEs, LCT command inputs
• Inmarsat/TECO to GSOC: Orbit information, deconflicted links, TLM, command logs
• GSOC to Inmarsat/TECO: link list, SOE, command inputs, telemetry requests
• Tesat to GSOC: link requests, command inputs
• GSOC to Tesat: SOE, status reports, TLM, command logs.
Operations: The first activities for TDP1 after the launch of Alphasat were to perform selftests and use SGLs for calibration purposes. The selftests were executed while the LCT manufacturer was on site at the Inmarsat control center, thus without active participation of the SCC. During that time though, the complete data transfer chain went through the operational test phase. For the SGLs, GSOC became involved in the operations cycle. During that period the planning process was verified, including the checks implemented in the system and so some inconsistencies within procedures and databases between the individual parties (Tesat/DLR/Inmarsat) were discovered and corrected.
In March 2014, the preparations for the operational testing of the interfaces between the TDP1 MCC and ESA for the Sentinel-1 A support were in their final stages (Ref. 79).
Figure 52: The organizational structure of TDP-1 (image credit: DLR, ESA, Tesat Spacecom)
1) “ARTES 8 Alphabus/Alphasat,” ESA, last update Dec. 2013, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=251&fcategoryid=52
2) “Inmarsat and Astrium sign Alphasat I-XL satellite contract,” Nov. 23, 2007, URL: http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=24098
3) “Alphabus equipment phase C/D selection,” ESA, Sept. 22, 2005, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=13665
4) “ARTES 8 Alphabus/Alphasat,” ESA, last update Dec. 16, 2013, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=251
5) Andreas Mauroschat, Stéphane Lascar, Thibéry Cussac, Michel Roux, Marc Patier, “Alphabus: Europe’s solution for the high-power satcom market,” ESA Bulletin No 142, May 2010, URL: http://download.esa.int/docs/telecom/Bulletin_REPRINT%20ALPHABUS_9.pdf
6) “Alphabus: An Extended European Capability,” ESA, Oct. 28, 2010, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=1139
7) Thibery Cussac, Stephane Lascar, Andreas Mauroschat, Patrick Dumont, “Alphabus, a successful European Public Private Partnership,” Proceedings of the 61st IAC (International Astronautical Congress), Prague, Czech Republic, Sept. 27-Oct. 1, 2010, IAC-10.B2.1.7
9) “More power to Alphabus,” ESA, April 4, 2011, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=30978
10) “ A communications satellite with vision,” Astrium, June 18, 2013, URL: http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/articles/alphasat-designed-and-built-by-astrium.html
11) Philippe Sivac, Eloy Torres, Edoardo Benzi, Juan Rivera Castro, Simon Weinberg, Marina Bernard, “AlphaSat- Partnership in orbit,” ESA Bulletin No 159, August 2014, pp: 23-31, URL: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/multimedia/publications/ESA-Bulletin-159/
12) Philippe Sivac, Pascal Windels, Bernard Olalainty & Didier Scouarnec, Jean-Marie Seguin, Stanislas Blanc, Loic Gaudic, Patrick Le Meur, ”Benefits of Alphabus, Europe’s first large telecoms platform,” ESA Bulletin No 164, 4th quarter 2015, issued on May 24, 2016, pp: 14-21, URL: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/multimedia/publications/ESA-Bulletin-164/offline/download.pdf
13) “Alphabus ready to offer new opportunities,” Space Daily, June 23, 2011, URL: http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Alphabus_ready_to_offer_new_opportunities_999.html
14) “Alphabus Fact Sheet,” ESA, May 5, 2011, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/media/document
16) “First voyage for Alphabus Service Module,” ESA, Jan. 29, 2010, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=30203
17) “Alphabus: An Extended European Capability,” ESA, January 16, 2010, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=30571
18) L. Soubrier, E. Trehet, “High Power PCU for Alphabus: PSR100V,” Proceedings of the 9th European Space Power Conference, Saint Raphael, France, June 6-10, 2011, ESA SP-690
19) “Power Supply Regulator (PSR) - 100V,” EADS Astrium, URL: http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/equipment/psr-100-v.html
20) “Alphasat reaches key ground-testing milestone,” Inmarsat, Nov. 26, 2012, URL: http://www.inmarsat.com/corporate/media-centre/newsroom/alphasat-reaches-key-ground-testing-milestone
21) “Alphasat status,” ESA Bulletin, No 153, February 2013, p. 74
22) “Alphasat's journey to meet its launcher,” ESA, July 3, 2013, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=32491
23) “Flawless launch of Alphasat, Europe's largest and most sophisticated telecom satellite,” ESA, July 25, 2013, URL: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Telecommunications_Integrated_Applications/Alphasat
24) “Alphasat I-XL – a quantum leap for satellite communications,” DLR, July 25, 2013, URL: http://www.dlr.de/dlr/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-10081/151_read-7645/year-all/#gallery/11698
25) ”GA-ASI Successfully Tests Air-To-Space Laser Communication System ,” GA-ASI, 20 February 2020, URL: http://www.ga.com/ga-asi-successfully-tests-air-to-space-laser-communication-system
26) ”Alphasat hosted payload program to be extended,” ESA, Dec. 20, 2016, URL: https://artes.esa.int/news/alphasat-hosted-payload-extension
27) Nicola Policella, Edoardo Benzi, ”Alphasat TDP operations coordination via Automated Planning: An Operational Experience Report,” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Space Operations (SpaceOps 2016), Daejeon, Korea, May 16-20, 2016, paper: AIAA 2016 2389, paper AIAA 2016 2514, URL: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2016-2514
28) Edoardo Benzi, Ian Shurmer, Nicola Policella, Daniel Troendle, Michael Lutzer, Sven Kuhlmann, Mark James, ”Optical Inter-Satellite Communication: the Alphasat and Sentinel-1A in-orbit experience,” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Space Operations (SpaceOps 2016), Daejeon, Korea, May 16-20, 2016, paper: AIAA 2016 2389, URL: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2016-2389
29) ”Step aside humans,” ESA, Jan. 19, 2016, URL: http://www.esa.int/About_Us/ESOC/Step_aside_humans
30) Daniel, ”Step aside humans: TECO will take care of that,” Jan. 15, 2016, URL: http://blogs.esa.int/rocketscience/2016/01/15/step-aside-humans-teco-will-take-care-of-that/
31) “Sentinel-1A - Alphasat laser link delivers excellent stability and robustness,” ESA ARTES Applications, July 14, 2015, URL: https://artes.esa.int/news/sentinel-alphasat-laser-link-stable-robust
32) “Inmarsat to create fourth full-service L-band region,” Inmarsat, June 10, 2015: URL: http://www.inmarsat.com/news/inmarsat-create-fourth-full-service-l-band-region/
33) “EMEA FleetBroadband transfers to Alphasat,” Maritime Satellite Communications, March 25, 2015, URL: http://www.thedigitalship.com/news/maritime-satellite-communications
34) “Telecom powerhouse provides safety-of-life broadband communications,” ESA ARTES program, March 27, 2015, URL:
35) Giuseppe Codispoti, “The first videoconference at Q/V Band: a new era of the satellite telecommunication history,” 52nd session of the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee, UNOOSA (United Nations Office for Outer Affairs), Vienna, Austria, Feb. 2-13, 2015, URL: http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/pres/stsc2015/tech-49E.pdf
36) ESA Bulletin No 161, May 11, 2015, p. 78, URL: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/multimedia/publications/ESA-Bulletin-161/offline/download.pdf
37) “Laser link offers high-speed delivery,” ESA, Nov. 28, 2014, URL: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities
38) “First commercial airline for Alphasat air safety service,” ESA, Nov. 28, 2014, URL: http://artes.esa.int/news/first-commercial-airline-alphasat-air-safety-service
39) Edoardo Benzi, Alex Cacioni, “Private Public Cooperation for Hosted Payload Operations: the Alphasat Concept,” SpaceOps 2014, 13th International Conference on Space Operations, Pasadena, CA, USA, May 5-9, 2014, paper: AIAA 2014-1887
40) “ASTRO APS Star Tracker Qualification,” ESA, Jenaoptronik, May 9, 2014, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=33007
41) “Alphasat status,” ESA Bulletin, No 157, Feb. 2014, p. 85, URL: http://www.esa.int/About_Us/ESA_Publications/ESA_Bulletin_157_Feb_2014
42) “Apphasat's pioneering high-frequency hosted payload set for experiments,” ESA, January 21, 2014, URL: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Telecommunications_Integrated_Applications/Alphasat
“Astrium-built Alphasat satellite ready for service at its
operational orbital position,” Astrium Press Release, Nov. 20,
2013, URL: http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/press_centre
44) “Alphasat's Laser Terminal on target,” ESA, Nov. 11, 2013, URL: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Telecommunications_Integrated_Applications
45) “Alphasat deploys its giant reflector in orbit,” ESA, Aug. 5, 2013, URL: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Telecommunications_Integrated_Applications
46) “Hosted payloads given green light,” ESA, June 16, 2011, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=31121
47) Northrop Grumman's Astro Aerospace Delivers Deployable Reflector to Astrium for Alphasat I-XL Spacecraft,” Astro Aerospace, May 9, 2011, URL: http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=221327
“Northrop Grumman's Astro Aerospace Delivers Deployable Reflector
to Astrium for Alphasat I-XL Spacecraft,” Space Mart, May 10,
2011, URL: http://www.spacemart.com/reports
49) Andreas Mauroschat, Stephane Lascar, Rudolf Halm, Francois Garat, Kevin Goodey, Xavier Lobao, Fabrice Joly, “Hitching a ride to orbit: The 'hosted payloads' concept,” ESA Bulletin, No 148, November 2011, pp. 33-41, URL: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/multimedia/publications/ESA-Bulletin-148/pageflip.html
50) “High-Tech Hitchhikers,” ESA, July 24, 2013, URL: http://www.esa.int
51) Gerd Muehlnikel, Hartmut Kämpfner, Frank Heine, Herwig Zech, Daniel Troendle, Rolf Meyer, Sabine Philipp-May, “The Alphasat GEO Laser Communication Terminal Flight Acceptance Tests,” Proceedings of the ICSOS (International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Application) 2012, Ajaccio, Corsica, France, October 9-12, 2012, URL: http://icsos2012.nict.go.jp/pdf/1569586689.pdf
52) Matthias Motzigemba, “Improvement of information latency in EO-Missions with the use of hybrid Laser/RF systems,” Proceedings of the 64th International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2013), Beijing, China, Sept. 23-27, 2013, paper: IAC-13-B220.127.116.11
53) F. Heine, H. Kämpfner, R. Lange, R. Czichy, R. Meyer, M. Lutzer, “Optical Inter-Satellite Communication Operational,” 2010 Military Communications Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, Oct. 31-Nov. 3, 2010, URL: http://18.104.22.168/proc/MILCOM2010/papers/p2284-lange.pdf
54) “Advanced laser technology on the way to space,” ESA, May 30, 2012, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=31813
55) Dominique Elser, Stefan Seel, Frank Heine, Thomas Länger, Momtchil Peev, Daniele Finocchiaro, Roberta Campo, Annamaria, Thomas Scheidl, Rupert Ursin, Zoran Sodnik, “Network Architectures for Space-Optical Quantum Cryptography Services,” Proceedings of the ICSOS (International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Application) 2012, Ajaccio, Corsica, France, October 9-12, 2012
H. Zech, F. Heine, D. Tröndle, P. M. Pimentel, K. Panzlaff, M.
Motzigemba, R. Meyer, S. Philipp-May, “LCTs on Alphasat and
Sentinel-1A: In orbit status of the LEO to GEO data relay
system,” Proceedings of the ICSO (International Conference on
Space Optics), Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, Oct. 7-10, 2014, URL: http://congrexprojects.com/Custom/ICSO/2014/Papers/1.%20Tuesday%207%20October
57) Philipp Wertz, Wolfgang Griethe, “High Data Rate Transmission for Earth Observation and ISR Missions using Next Generation Downlink Subsystems and Free-Space Optical Communications,” First Workshop on Ka-band Earth Observation Radar Missions, KEO'12, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Nov. 5-9, 2012
58) Otto Koudelka, “Q/V-band Communications and Propagation Experiments Using Alphasat,” Proceedings of the 61st IAC (International Astronautical Congress), Prague, Czech Republic, Sept. 27-Oct. 1, 2010, IAC-10.B2.1.8
Piero Gabellini, Luciano D'Agristina, Luciano Dicecca, Domenico Di
Lanzo, Nicola Gatti, Jean-Christophe Angevain, “The Electrical
Design and Verification of the Alphasat TDP5 Antenna Farm,”
Proceedings of the 32nd ESA Antenna Workshop on Antennas for Space
Applications, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Oct. 5-8, 2010, URL: http://utopia.duth.gr/~iaitidis/ESA%20conference%202010
60) O. Koudelka, M. Schmidt, J. Ebert, “Design of a 40/50 GHz Satellite Ground Station for Fade Mitigation Experiments,” Proceedings of IAC 2011 (62nd International Astronautical Congress), Cape Town, South Africa, Oct. 3-7, 2011, paper: IAC-11.B2.2.7
61) Piero Gabellini, Domenico Di Lanzo, Luciano D'Agristina, Jean-Christophe Angevain, Luciano Dicecca, Paolo Proietti Zolla, Gianfranco Sordetti, Luis Rolo, “Test and verification of the Alphasat TDP5 Q/V-band communication Antenna,” Proceedings of 33rd ESA Antenna Workshop on Challenges for Space Antenna Systems, ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Oct. 18-21, 2011
62) Giuseppe Codispoti, “Fostering fast telecommunications developments trough the use of Q/V band satellite links,” Proceedings of the 49th Session of UNCOPUOS-STSC (UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space-Scientific and Technical Subcommittee), Vienna, Austria, Feb. 6-17, 2012, URL: http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/pdf/pres/stsc2012/tech-50E.pdf
63) “Alphasat Payload Honors Aldo Paraboni,” ESA, URL: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Telecommunications_Integrated_Applications
64) Giuseppe Codispoti, “The start of the Q/V Band Experimental Program: new possibilities for fast telecommunication infrastructure developments,” Proceedings of the 51st Session of Scientific & Technical Subcommittee of UNCOPUOS, Vienna, Austria, Feb. 11-22, 2014, URL: http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/pres/stsc2014/tech-24E.pdf
65) Giuseppe Codispoti, “Involvement of Digital Divide affected countries in Q//V Band experimentation and use,” Proceedings of the 50th Session of Scientific & Technical Subcommittee of UNCOPUOS, Vienna, Austria, Feb. 11-22, 2013, URL: http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/pdf/pres/stsc2013/tech-45E.pdf
Carlo Cornacchini, Enrico Russo, A. Pandolfi ; C. Cornacchini ; S.
Falzini , A. Vernucci, “The Alphasat TDP#5 experiment and
challenges for future Q/V-band systems exploitation,” 2011, , URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?
67) Franz Teschl, Otto Koudelka, “Design and first test of a combined 19.7 and 39.4 GHz beacon receiver for the Alphasat propagation experiment,” Proceedings of the 64th International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2013), Beijing, China, Sept. 23-27, 2013, paper: IAC-13-B2.5.2
68) M. Ruggieri, C. Riva, M. De Sanctis, T. Rossi, “ Alphasat TDP#5 mission: Towards future EHF satellite communications,” Proceedings of ESTEL 2012 - First IEEE-AESS European Conference on Satellite Telecommunications, 2-5 October 2012, Rome, Italy
69) “Active Pixel Sensor ASTRO APS,” URL: http://www.maks.german-pavilion.com
70) “Alphasat carries new space compass,” ESA, July 15, 2013, URL: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Telecommunications_Integrated_Applications
71) “Alphasat TDP#8: Environment and Effects Facility (AEEF),” ESA, Oct. 28, 2008, URL: http://telecom.esa.int/telecom/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=26290
72) “Reading Radiation in Space,” ESA, May 21. 2013, URL: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Telecommunications_Integrated_Applications
73) “Environmental Testing and Radiation Sensor,” ESA factsheet, URL: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/technology/TDP8_factsheet.pdf
74) Julián Blasco, Eloy Rico, Pablo Genovard, Cristina Sáez, Olga Navasquillo, Javier Martí, “DAS Photonics Developments For Analogue And Digital Photonics Links For Intrasatellite Communications,” Proceedings of the ICSO (International Conference on Space Optics), Ajaccio, Corse, France, Oct. 9-12, 2012, paper: ICSO-102, URL: http://congrex.nl/icso/2012/papers/FP_ICSO-102.pdf
75) J. Blasco, O. Navasquillo, C. Sáez, “Digital and Analogue Optoelectronic Links for Intrasatellite Communications,” ICSO 2010 (International Conference on Space Optics), Rhodes Island, Greece, Oct. 4-8, 2010, URL: http://congrex.nl/icso/Papers/TPosters/26_Blasco.pdf
76) Nuno Borges de Carvalho, Hugo Mostardinha, Pedro Cabral, “The first European GaN Experiment in Space,” URL: http://www.av.it.pt/medidas/space/Flayer/IT%20no%20Espa%C3%A7o%20EN_IT.pdf
77) Edoardo Benzi, Alex Cacioni, “Private Public Cooperation for Hosted Payload Operations: the Alphasat Concept,” SpaceOps 2014, 13th International Conference on Space Operations, Pasadena, CA, USA, May 5-9, 2014, paper: AIAA 2014-1887
78) Nicola Policella, Henrique Oliveira, Edoardo Benzi, “An automated approach to support AlphaSat TDP operations,” ASTRA (Advanced Space Technologies in Robotic sand Automation ), Noordwijk, The Netherlands, May 15-17, 2013, URL: http://robotics.estec.esa.int/ASTRA/Astra2013/Papers/Policella_2811275.pdf
79) R. Ballweg, S. Kuhlmann, G. Rossmanith, M. Hobsch, “TDP1 Ground System Design,” SpaceOps 2014, 13th International Conference on Space Operations, Pasadena, CA, USA, May 5-9, 2014, paper: AIAA 2014-1626, URL: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2014-1626
Rossmanith, Sven Kuhlmann, Boris Grishechkin, Benjamin Schlepp, Jan
Pitann, ”Laser Communication in Space: The Ground System Design
of TDP-1 and its current operational experience,” Proceedings of
the 14th International Conference on Space Operations (SpaceOps 2016), Daejeon, Korea, May 16-20, 2016, paper: AIAA 2016-2522, URL: http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2016-2522
The information compiled and edited in this article was provided by Herbert J. Kramer from his documentation of: ”Observation of the Earth and Its Environment: Survey of Missions and Sensors” (Springer Verlag) as well as many other sources after the publication of the 4th edition in 2002. - Comments and corrections to this article are always welcome for further updates (email@example.com).